![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have IEspyad merged into the registry, I have just updated IEspyad tonight and discovered I had to run SpywareBlaster v3 again as some of the protection was removed after re-merging IEspyads lsit
![]() Is this a conflict with the programs and am I still as safe running both of them despite the fact one removed the protection I have since re-enabled? :'(
__________________
Vista-XP forum - xpforum - Windows XP - Vista - HijackThis support |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi, Robyn. I had the same problem with Spybot and Spyware Blaster. My guess is that reinstalling or modifying one program can remove the kill-bits it can set into the registry. I also reenabled all protections and I haven't had a problem since. As for compatibility I have not heard of Spyad. I hope somebody else can answer your question there.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Looks like a database issue to me - no more, no less. Let's see if we can pont the IESpyad developer to this thread. In the meanwhile, I'd recommend enabling all protections.
regards. paul
__________________
01110010 01100101 01100111 01100001 01110010 01100100 01110011 00100000 01110000 01100001 01110101 01101100 |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi:
This is a known issue with SWB 3.0 and IE-SPYAD. The short story is that IE-SPYAD removes some invalid entries that SWB 3.0 sets and replaces them with valid ones. See this thread over at DSLR for a more complete description of what's going on: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/rema...3441~mode=flat Javacool is undoubtedly working on an update that will fix this. Best, Eric L. Howes URL tags added to the link - paul |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Eric,
Thanks for attending this fast - much obliged! regards. paul
__________________
01110010 01100101 01100111 01100001 01110010 01100100 01110011 00100000 01110000 01100001 01110101 01101100 |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yep - this is indeed something that will be fixed for SpywareBlaster 3.1.
So no worries. ![]() Best regards, -Javacool
__________________
*Official BrightFort Website* *SpywareBlaster* *Please note: I am not responsible if any advice herein causes any trouble whatsoever *
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sorry about only getting back now but posted this just before I had to shut down my computer for the night! Thanks for the links and the re-assurrance that I am still protected even though I re-enable SWB after IE Spyad - I will continue to use both now, I was alarmed when I noticed the 'unprotected' item re-listed (thought something had attacked the program on me
)Thanks again to everyone.
__________________
Vista-XP forum - xpforum - Windows XP - Vista - HijackThis support |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|