|
|
#1
November 17th, 2009, 03:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Final comment on Final comment on Prevx test by MRG
I read this thread (Given by Triple Helix)
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=251113 MRG seems indeed to be suspect tester, but I think one can still learn from their tests something (if one is careful) as well as I think I can learn eg. from this Symantec sponsored test: http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=256947 My point was mainly to critisize the argument of false testing methology. It was an on-demand test. If Prevx does not shine in such a test, it may indicate that Prevx does not shine in on-demand scanning.
__________________
"Si vis pacem, para bellum" Author of Probably the best free security list in the world |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
