![]() |
|
#251
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#252
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
yeah sorry i miss read. it happens |
|
#253
|
||||
|
||||
|
pbust, did you see my previous post re: error code 11?
|
|
#254
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ Pbust,
How well will PCA protect on dial up users? yes im sure there still out there :d |
|
#255
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I am on the latest built but i am still seeing the problem. the built is 3.5.5 for firefox robin |
|
#256
|
||||
|
||||
|
Brocke, I've been using this for awhile, even in times where I was previously on sluggish snail speeds of wireless (comparable to dial-up most of the time). No slowdowns with it.
__________________
Fine Art Landscape Photography
|
|
#257
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#258
|
||||
|
||||
|
@robin9 & @Blackcat, thanks for replicating the problem. We will take a look at it.
@EliteKiller, haven't forgotten about you. Will send you a PM with some instructions. Sorry for the late replies, I was away from PC for a few days ![]() |
|
#259
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I just tried it again- cleared the cache in firefox 3.5.5- same behavior as previously stated robin |
|
#260
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Again thanks for bringing this to our attention! |
|
#261
|
||||
|
||||
|
how will i see the fix? will it be implimented in the next version?
also since this version has no upgrade in it- when the new version comes out will i have to uninstall this one or can i just put it on top of this one? Also i just looked at panda cloud and it says it is stopped, only there is no error msg- nothing until i opened it to look at where the version is I did nothing to stop it. I clicked on "Start" and all it is doing is is trying to start and now it says i have no internet connect but ummm I am typing this to you and you will see it go to you so i do have internet connection robin |
|
#262
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Try and run there new uninstaller see if that helps http://www.cloudantivirus.com/forum/...51462&tstart=0 |
|
#263
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#264
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Congratulations, I think I'll try it again ![]() |
|
#265
|
||||
|
||||
|
yup and ver. 1.1 will have alot more into it also.
|
|
#266
|
||||
|
||||
|
If Panda Cloud AV is working offline, how is this different from an Normal AV?
__________________
"Security" is not a Product. Please use "search" first.... especially on the topic resources usage. |
|
#267
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Pedro Bustamante: One of the philosophies of the new protection model we've designed is that AVs don't need to detect every piece of malware that has ever existed or will exist, which is the traditional signature model. Basically what we're saying is that, if we have "x" millions of users in the Collective Intelligence community, what Panda Cloud Antivirus really needs to protect against is whatever malware is circulating amongst those users, and protect them even while off-line. For the rest of malware, you can detect it while connected to the Collective Intelligence servers. In other words, why do you want your AV to protect you against malware which you'll never even see or come across? Why do you need your AV to waste resources trying to detect some 5 year old malware, 5 day old malware that's already dead or even malware that is affecting Norton users but not Panda users? This is where the whole "community" aspect of Panda Cloud Antivirus steps in. Whatever Collective Intelligence "sees" out there as circulating in the wild, it creates a small cache version of signatures which detects and disinfects that subset of malware and synchronizes it in every agent for off-line operation. Even while off-line, Panda Cloud Antivirus will protect against all malware that is circulating, against all malware that is "important for you". Another way of putting it is that this AV has been designed for real people, real users, not for testers and evaluators which judge how good or how bad an AV is based on lab isolated tests of millions of samples which have not seen the light of day in months or even years. Unfortunately the multi-billion AV industry is very influenced (and therefore limited) by what magazine and independent comparatives publish, even though most testing methodologies in existance today still do not try to reflect the real life situations of end users. We're very hopeful that the work of AMTSO is going to help a lot in improving testing methodologies and bring them closer to reflect real life scenarios. (back to top) Read more... |
|
#268
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks EliteKiller
![]() |
|
#269
|
||||
|
||||
|
@Pbust,
How soon do you think we could start beta testing again to make sure PCA 1.1 is bug free? |
|
#270
|
||||
|
||||
|
We're adding quite a bit of functionality into 1.1, so it might take a few months before a beta is released.
|
|
#271
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
As there are still some users who are having problems with the first release; high CPU usage, the turning off of protection with no tray warning. So hopefully there will be a 1.01 version soon which would be useful to at least some of us. |
|
#272
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Is this bug fixed? ![]() |
|
#273
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
What OS are you running. i have PCA running on vista 32bit with sp2 and windows 7 home pre 32bit with no issues |
|
#274
|
|||
|
|||
|
Windows 7 as well, so I should try it again
![]() |
|
#275
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
i would its pc mags editor chice award for best free av. also ver. 1.1 will have auto update for program along 'i think' behav. protection. along with more offline protection. i like very light and simple. it detects everything. |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|