![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
A bit OT but since we're talking about HIPS...
When you update an application already listed in Computer Security Policy (as Custom) and run it, you get no prompt that the file has changed? I believe CIS doesn't check the md5 but just remember the paths. Anyone also noticed this with CIS? What Stem reported might be applicable to CIS also. Take note that my CIS HIPS is in Safe Mode (old config). When I update, I either turn-off CIS HIPS or use install mode. I haven't tested with Paranoid Mode. Do you think the safelist db/trusted certificates has got something to do with this?
__________________
"O miserable shadow clad in darkness! Hurting and disdaining people, a karmic soul drowning in sin... Would you try dying for once?" - Enma Ai Last edited by thanatos_theos : October 16th, 2009 at 07:35 AM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The Image Execution Control monitors file changes in CIS. According to the help file (when Image Execution Control is enabled) CIS calculates the hash-value of a file before it loads into the memory. Going by it, file alterations - such as updates - should be detected by D+. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
As a test, turn-on install mode or turn-off HIPS, update your Realtek HD Audio. After startup, turn-on HIPS and click Realtek systray icon. CIS should prompt you that RTHDCPL.exe has changed right? *I didn't try this yet*
__________________
"O miserable shadow clad in darkness! Hurting and disdaining people, a karmic soul drowning in sin... Would you try dying for once?" - Enma Ai Last edited by thanatos_theos : October 16th, 2009 at 09:54 AM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
There was a discussion on this somewhere on the COMODO forums. I had read it, but don't recollect much of what was said there. But I do remember - vaguely though - the cheif developer of CIS (egemen) stating that CIS does not verify hashes of executables which are modified by the user himself, or something of that like. You can search for threads on topics related to this in the COMODO forums. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I guess that was intended to make CIS user friendly and lessen alerts. Well, I think CIS will alert the user anyway if ever some malprocess tries to change/hijack/infect/tamper an application or it's integrity.
__________________
"O miserable shadow clad in darkness! Hurting and disdaining people, a karmic soul drowning in sin... Would you try dying for once?" - Enma Ai |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
As I know CIS doesn,t check for hashes, as it has real time file defence. Same is true of MD.
__________________
Ubuntu 13.04 AX64 Time Machine, Comodo FW & Defence Plus, |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you aigle.
I just skimmed on their forums and read that Image Execution depends on the extensions set and only checks for hashes in 'real-time'. But it disregards those found in/matching those in the safelist db. Maybe in the future they can do that on-demand, on-next execution of the updated file or during start-up. I think this on-demand hash scan (for new exes) occurs in start-up when using Clean PC mode. ![]()
__________________
"O miserable shadow clad in darkness! Hurting and disdaining people, a karmic soul drowning in sin... Would you try dying for once?" - Enma Ai Last edited by thanatos_theos : October 16th, 2009 at 06:13 PM. |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|