![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which is your main search engine results rating tool? | |||
| McAfee SiteAdvisor |
|
3 | 3.16% |
| PC Tools BrowserDefender |
|
1 | 1.05% |
| Trend Micro TrendProtect |
|
0 | 0% |
| AVG LinkScanner |
|
1 | 1.05% |
| Finjan SecureBrowsing |
|
0 | 0% |
| WOT |
|
29 | 30.53% |
| None |
|
61 | 64.21% |
| Voters: 95. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you for voting
![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
None.
I would like to use avg linkscanner but it conflict with avira webguard. ![]()
__________________
XP Panda Cloud Pro - Sandboxie Vista Avast free - Bufferzone |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Another vote for None
__________________
Creer,
Member of the Alliance of Security Analysis Professionals Windows 7 32-bit. &. ✓Look 'n' Stop. ✓DefenseWall .✓BestCrypt VE .✓ShadowProtect |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
None here also.
__________________
Windows 7 64 bit,Win Patrol Plus,Operamail, Bitdefender Plus AV 2013,gmx mail. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
None. I have tried SiteAdvisor, WOT and Finjan. I found them to be inaccurate on labeling both the good, and the bad. I find WOT to be subjective and based to much on user opinions and not actual identified problems. Having said that, if I used one that would be the one I'd use.
I do on occasion just to compare, check some sites using the on-line checks at the SiteAdvisor, WOT and Browser Defender sites.
__________________
FreeDOS, Haiku, PCLinuxOS, Slackware, Snow Leopard, Ubuntu, Ultimate Edition, Windows 7, Windows XP. (Primary OS, KDE) Living in Paradise!!
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
There's no "Other" but i use a tool that shows a ton of site metrics in the search results under each site.
It's not a security tool, and won't help with known legitimate sites that have been hacked/injected but overall it does an excellent job sorting the wheat from the chaff.
__________________
Malware Defender |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Where's FS2010 browser protection?
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
WOT, though like others have said, take the ratings with a grain of salt.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Is there a free version? ![]() |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Don't think so - it's part of the FS IS2010 suite. I also hear it isn't included with the stand alone AV. It shows ratings for search results as well as blocking access to 'dodgy' sites similar to WOT. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
None for me
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I removed AVG LinkScanner because of network problems. What a pity!
I will give WOT a try ![]() |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
No
![]()
__________________
May you fly straight to heaven - but if you go to Hades - may Lethe run with Guinness |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I agree, a real-time tool is a better choice. However, most of the AV contain a webshield nowadays ![]() |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
I voted 'none' because I have no main tool.
I use both SiteAdvisor and WOT. I also used LinkScanner however due to constant network timeouts with browsers I had to remove it. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Like condominimums....don't use em.
![]() |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
None, I don't care for ratings. Besides, many of the sites I go to, hmm, hmm, are the kind that gets flagged often and we aren't talking malware here
![]() Mrk
__________________
http://www.dedoimedo.com All your base are belong to us Linux Systems Expert / Systems Programmer, Linux System Administrator, LPIC-1, LPIC-2 (WIP), GSEC, CCHD, CCHA |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yesterday I entered a web page of a political party and WOT notified me: Warning! Page is not trustworthy!
I think it's time to remove WOT from all machines, I can't stand that propaganda ... |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Browser defender
Better than all
__________________
Windows 7 Home premium x64 WEBROOT Secure Anywhere Complete |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
None, i rate them myself
![]() |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
WOT as a Firefox Add-on
|
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|