Tested compatibility with DefenseWall for your coming features?

[raven211]

Simply thinking about things like semi-sandboxing, USB-protection, etc. and if you've tested this with the DefenseWall software (and similar for that matter...) to see if any conflicts because of approach appears?

[PrevxHelp]

Originally Posted by raven211

Simply thinking about things like semi-sandboxing, USB-protection, etc. and if you've tested this with the DefenseWall software (and similar for that matter...) to see if any conflicts because of approach appears?

We haven't tested DefenseWall yet but are still engineering everything so that it will be conceptually compatible with other conventional technologies. There is a possibility for some browser-based protection incompatibility but we're working on using a whitelisting approach for those applications (like SafeCentral and Trusteer).

We also have a transparent keyboard scrambling/encryption module for browser data now and are working to ensure we will remain compatible with other scrambling technologies like the aptly named KeyScrambler

[jmonge]

Originally Posted by PrevxHelp

We haven't tested DefenseWall yet but are still engineering everything so that it will be conceptually compatible with other conventional technologies. There is a possibility for some browser-based protection incompatibility but we're working on using a whitelisting approach for those applications (like SafeCentral and Trusteer).

We also have a transparent keyboard scrambling/encryption module for browser data now and are working to ensure we will remain compatible with other scrambling technologies like the aptly named KeyScrambler

good to know joecool stuff coming up