Wilders Security Forums  

Go Back   Wilders Security Forums > Official Returnil Support Forum > General Returnil discussions
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old March 3rd, 2009, 06:35 PM
BokuNoNinpo BokuNoNinpo is offline
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1
Default Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

Hi, I have used Sandboxie and only recently learned about Returnil. After reading the product description, I would like to know two things.

1) Returnil seems like a sandbox for the entire system that auto-deletes the sandbox upon shutdown of the computer. If this is so, how does one retain information that one would like to keep, e.g., newly created documents, downloaded files, etc?

2) Is sandboxie really necessary as a browser protector if one is using Returnil? What would be the purpose of using them together? I like to keep my system as lean as possible and it seems using them both is overkill.

Because I'd ideally just use one of them on my system, your opinions and answers are very welcome. If your comments are persuasive I may use both. I just haven't thought of a reason to as of now. thanks.
  #2  
Old March 3rd, 2009, 09:30 PM
normishmael
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

I do use both,and have done away with real-time anti-virus all togather.
with the preium version of Returnil,saving a document or file is as simply as drag and drop,or right click context "save to real disk"
The latest beta even allows right click context option to delete files from the "real" disc.
My real logic for using both,is the "drop my rights" like option in Sandboxie
really seals the gap from the very few malware that are able to defeat Returnil.
There is a thread here that advises a limited user account,and as I am NOT going to do that,and as the "drop my rights" download feels like a hack,and as Sandboxie does the same thing,while adding even more security,and as
both Returnil and Sandboxie run really,really light,for me it just works.

Oh yes,unless Coldmoon can say other wise,I dont thank you can save files etc in the free Returnil version,other than by coping them to DVD,or getting creative/cute and emailing them to yourself,etc.
What ever you decide,they are both great standalone or togather.
You can always just set Sandboxie not to start with Windows,and trim a process and a tiny bit of RAM.
  #3  
Old March 3rd, 2009, 09:50 PM
BlueZannetti BlueZannetti is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,589
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

Quote:
Originally Posted by normishmael
Oh yes,unless Coldmoon can say other wise,I dont thank you can save files etc in the free Returnil version,other than by coping them to DVD,or getting creative/cute and emailing them to yourself,etc.
How about a second (i.e. non-system) partition?

Blue
  #4  
Old March 3rd, 2009, 09:56 PM
normishmael
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

Over my head,but sounds good.
  #5  
Old March 3rd, 2009, 10:37 PM
BlueZannetti BlueZannetti is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,589
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

Quote:
Originally Posted by normishmael
Over my head,but sounds good.
Actually, probably not.

Returnil basically protects the system partition only. If you have a standard Windows install, that would be the C: drive. In a typical situation, that reflects a single physical hard drive on the system as well (let's call it drive 0) which has a single partition located on it (the C: drive that you generally see).

You can create multiple partitions on that single physical drive 0 (say C:, D:, etc.). If you do this, there are actually ways to protect all partitions with the premium product, but the default protection is for C: only, therefore if you want to save stuff, save it to, for example, D:

If you don't wish to muck with partitioning, the most straightforward solution on a single partition system is to use a USB flash drive as needed. It's a lot simpler than email or DVD.

Blue
  #6  
Old March 3rd, 2009, 11:02 PM
Firebytes's Avatar
Firebytes Firebytes is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 859
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

If you need somewhere to save things just allow Returnil Personal (free) to create a virtual partition when you install it, very simple.
  #7  
Old March 4th, 2009, 03:47 AM
normishmael
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueZannetti
Actually, probably not.


If you don't wish to muck with partitioning, the most straightforward solution on a single partition system is to use a USB flash drive as needed. It's a lot simpler than email or DVD.

Blue


Yes Sir,that is a heck of a lot more simple.
  #8  
Old March 5th, 2009, 01:00 PM
Doodler Doodler is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 204
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

I appreciate this thread; the OP echoes my curiosity about Returnil. I've been using Sandboxie (registered version) for about a year now (discovered it and installed it after getting nailed by a zero day exploit). I like SBIE a lot and have grown fairly familiar with it's features and very comfortable with its protection. But the simplicity Returnil offers in being able to easily virtualize one's entire system is appealing...especially when the little kiddies' fingers go romping over the keyboard potentially making all sorts of unwanted changes.

So I've been riding the fence, trying to decide for months now whether or not to install Returnil to supplement SBIE. Like the OP, I struggle with the idea of having both products installed. But, then again, each one is lightweight...so I need to convince myself that it's probably no big deal to have both running.

@ normishmael, I love the way you prefer to keep things simple. We're like minded in that regard.

Anyway, I'll keep monitoring this thread. Hopefully we'll see additional informative input.
  #9  
Old March 5th, 2009, 01:40 PM
normishmael
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

Hi Doodler.
It took me a long time to see the value of simplicity.
Plenty of times my signature looked like the download
list at download.com.
  #10  
Old March 5th, 2009, 02:00 PM
Coldmoon's Avatar
Coldmoon Coldmoon is offline
Returnil Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North Carolina USA
Posts: 2,744
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

Hi Doodler,
Quote:
So I've been riding the fence, trying to decide for months now whether or not to install Returnil to supplement SBIE. Like the OP, I struggle with the idea of having both products installed. But, then again, each one is lightweight...so I need to convince myself that it's probably no big deal to have both running.

They are complimentary as each implements virtualization in different ways with different targets. SBIE is application level and RVS is System level which can be thought of as micro or macro management respectively. Where SBIE is monitoring and sandboxing specific programs as determined by the user, RVS is clonning any/all changes made to the entire System Partition.

Mike
__________________
Returnil: The Real Security!
Follow us on Facebook
  #11  
Old March 6th, 2009, 03:27 AM
bgoodman4 bgoodman4 is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,947
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

My 2 cents --------- I have been using Returnil and Sandboxie together for some time now and I can assure you you will find no drag on your PC when browsing. Its not like you are running intensive resource use programs when you are using Sandboxie or rather its very unlikely that you will ever do so. After all your browsing the Internet, not running a CAD program or doing illustration work. Running these two light fast programs on todays PCs (and by today I mean most workstations produced as late as 2 to 4 years ago) would not put any system under stain. And best of all the extra layer of protection is a blessing. Combine the two with an imaging program and you have covered yourself as completely as I guess you can.

As I said, just my 2 cents worth.
  #12  
Old March 7th, 2009, 09:45 AM
EASTER's Avatar
EASTER EASTER is offline
Massive Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: U.S.A. (South)
Posts: 4,510
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

As already metioned courtesy Firebytes, theres your protected storage right there. You can create on install the virtual holding tank i call it, and even when in SESSION LOCK or STATIC, your apps are isolated from being discarded and you can access them as usual.

EASTER
__________________
★AX 64 Time MachineCurrent Version 1.1.0.996 ★
★Shadow Defender★| EQSecure v4.0 Beta3 |#Sandboxie 4.08 beta# |FirstDefense-ISR|★FileChangeAlarm★ |Reserve Space|
Maxthon 4 | X Iron 17.0 | Chromium 19.0 | CometBird 11

Microsoft Windows 8 64bit (UEFI/GPT) Secure Boot¶
¶Linux Mint 14 MATE¶
  #13  
Old March 7th, 2009, 02:24 PM
raakii's Avatar
raakii raakii is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 593
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

yes u need both ......
__________________
Normal: Nod32+Sandboxie
Test: ShadowDefender
Recovery:DriveSnapshot
  #14  
Old March 13th, 2009, 07:34 PM
JustFixIt JustFixIt is offline
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 10
Thumbs up Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

BokuNoNinpo, you took the question right out of my mouth. I too wanted to know the best way to go about DLding items that I want to keep w/o the off/on reboot (I don't have Rnil Prem though.)

But the partition idea sounds very interesting. So just to clarify you can have Rnil protect just where the system OS & registry is located but not have it cover another partition? Or maybe better yet have it cover an entire drive but not the other?
  #15  
Old March 14th, 2009, 01:14 AM
EASTER's Avatar
EASTER EASTER is offline
Massive Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: U.S.A. (South)
Posts: 4,510
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebytes
If you need somewhere to save things just allow Returnil Personal (free) to create a virtual partition when you install it, very simple.

I was about to say the same thing because RETURNIL RVS offers a fantastic feature at the start to make a Virtual Partition just for that purpose.

But Firebytes beat me to it. LoL

I use it all the time and it's stable, lockable in the Premium Versions, and serves a very useful purpose period.

AS far as running Sandboxie w/ Returnil, i don't see anything really wrong with that if thats your choice, but RETURNIL either in SESSION LOCK or SHADOW MODE pretty much contains if not everything as it was designed to do in the first place.

Memory Virtualization is my favorite. Wonderful Feature Indeed!

EASTER
__________________
★AX 64 Time MachineCurrent Version 1.1.0.996 ★
★Shadow Defender★| EQSecure v4.0 Beta3 |#Sandboxie 4.08 beta# |FirstDefense-ISR|★FileChangeAlarm★ |Reserve Space|
Maxthon 4 | X Iron 17.0 | Chromium 19.0 | CometBird 11

Microsoft Windows 8 64bit (UEFI/GPT) Secure Boot¶
¶Linux Mint 14 MATE¶
  #16  
Old March 16th, 2009, 11:31 AM
Coldmoon's Avatar
Coldmoon Coldmoon is offline
Returnil Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North Carolina USA
Posts: 2,744
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustFixIt
...But the partition idea sounds very interesting. So just to clarify you can have Rnil protect just where the system OS & registry is located but not have it cover another partition? Or maybe better yet have it cover an entire drive but not the other?

Yes and no. RVS will protect the system partition (where the system OS & registry is located) by default but also includes an additional feture that allows you to deny access to other partitions and drives if you want or need to use it called File Protection.

Mike
__________________
Returnil: The Real Security!
Follow us on Facebook
  #17  
Old April 27th, 2009, 10:48 AM
lovemedo's Avatar
lovemedo lovemedo is offline
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 5
Question Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldmoon
Yes and no. RVS will protect the system partition (where the system OS & registry is located) by default but also includes an additional feture that allows you to deny access to other partitions and drives if you want or need to use it called File Protection.

Mike

///by default but also includes an additional feture that allows you to deny access to other partitions and drives if you want or need to use it called File Protection.
///

1-where is the additional feture that allows me to deny access to other partitions and drives?
  #18  
Old April 27th, 2009, 10:53 AM
lovemedo's Avatar
lovemedo lovemedo is offline
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 5
Unhappy Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

Sandboxie is 4 64 bit.

Do u have one 4 32 bit?


plz i need the link.

////if you want or need to use it called File Protection.////

plz i need the link.
  #19  
Old April 27th, 2009, 11:57 AM
Doodler Doodler is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 204
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

Quote:
Originally Posted by lovemedo
Sandboxie is 4 64 bit. Do u have one 4 32 bit?(

No, you've got it backwards. SBIE is not available for Vista 64 bit...only 32 bit. http://www.sandboxie.com/index.php?WindowsVista64

Some older versions of SBIE are available for XP 64 bit, but are no longer supported. http://www.sandboxie.com/index.php?OldVersions

Newer versions of SBIE are for 32 bit.
  #20  
Old April 27th, 2009, 03:06 PM
Coldmoon's Avatar
Coldmoon Coldmoon is offline
Returnil Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North Carolina USA
Posts: 2,744
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

Quote:
1-where is the additional feture that allows me to deny access to other partitions and drives?

It is the File Protection feature. Open the program and then click the "Change" link to open the list manager where you can add non-system files, folders, partitions, and drives. Please keep in mind that Returnil will see a file and folder as being separate items. This means you should select the files to protect within the folder rather than just the folder itself.
__________________
Returnil: The Real Security!
Follow us on Facebook
  #21  
Old April 29th, 2009, 02:03 AM
bman412 bman412 is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 261
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldmoon
This means you should select the files to protect within the folder rather than just the folder itself.

Oh boy and I thought simply selecting the folder protects the files nested within So what then when the folder has subfolders and a considerable amount of files? Add them all one by one?
  #22  
Old April 29th, 2009, 04:29 AM
pegr pegr is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,608
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

I'm using Returnil Premium and the File Protection feature works for me the way I expected it to. For those partitions and folders that I have set up in the File Protection list, ALL access to nested files and subfolders is automatically blocked without me having to add them individually to the list.

I realise this is not the way Coldmoon describes it so I've double checked and it's definitely how it works for me.

BTW, I also use Sandboxie and the two applications work just fine together.

One improvement I would like to see to Returnil is a check box against each entry in the File Protection list, similar to the way File Manager works, in order to allow individual entries to be temporarily excluded from protection without having to disable File Protection globally across all entries in the list.

In my case, I keep my D: drive (HP recovery partition) protected. I also have a folder within My Documents on my data partition (E: drive) containing confidential data. I would like to be able to selectively enable/disable the protection on my confidential folder whilst keeping the protection on the recovery partition enabled at all times.

Coldmoon: Is it planned to add this in a future version of Returnil?
  #23  
Old May 7th, 2009, 11:34 AM
Miska Miska is offline
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 16
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueZannetti
How about a second (i.e. non-system) partition?

Blue

I just move files to one of my other 3 hard disks. you can get a small drive for peanuts these days. problem solved.
  #24  
Old May 13th, 2009, 11:02 PM
Trespasser's Avatar
Trespasser Trespasser is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Clintwood, Virginia
Posts: 967
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

Returnil and Sandboxie are a good combination. Running it right now.
__________________
Ubuntu Precise (Cinnamon DE) 12.04 32bit on one laptop, Ubuntu Precise Gnome Fallback 12.04 32bit on another laptop, Ubuntu Precise (Cinnamon DE) 12.04 64bit on our main Desktop, and Xubuntu 12.04 64bit on our spare Desktop.


"I wish I knew as much as I think I do"...
  #25  
Old June 21st, 2009, 11:30 AM
Dregg Heda Dregg Heda is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 830
Default Re: Returnil vs. Sandboxie -- need both?

What exactly does file protection do? I mean does it extend virtalisation protection to non-C drives? So if I file protected all the other drives on my pc they would all be virtualised? Or does it completely deny access to all other drives, so if my d drive is being file protected i cant save any information on it? Also how does file protection vary from full system protection? Thanks in advance.
 

Wilders Security Forums > Official Returnil Support Forum > General Returnil discussions « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, Wilders Security Forums