|
|
#27
May 21st, 2009, 03:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Re: SSUpdater.com Anti-Malware test
Quote:
You mean this test discussed here........ http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=240856
__________________
May you fly straight to heaven - but if you go to Hades - may Lethe run with Guinness |
|
#28
May 21st, 2009, 04:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SSUpdater.com Anti-Malware test
Quote:
mmm... nice image. I have this image from Download.com: Source Link http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/1230/dibujoiie.png Hey, but, hang on, it says spyware remover... I thought MBAM was an antimalware program...  Last edited by geko : May 21st, 2009 at 04:22 PM. |
|
#29
May 21st, 2009, 04:43 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: SSUpdater.com Anti-Malware test
Quote:
Does download.com have an antimalware category? Would make sense if they did....but i don't think they do  |
|
#30
May 21st, 2009, 05:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SSUpdater.com Anti-Malware test
Quote:
I dont think they have that category either. Its a bit confusing now that I look at it closer. What a mess. Never used Download.com and now that I've seen it closely, I think I never will.  P.S.: But, hang on, I think I have but coming from the authors portal of some program. Dont remember which one. |
|
#32
May 21st, 2009, 06:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: SSUpdater.com Anti-Malware test
Quote:
Prevx is going to be tested by a well respected testing site in the not too distant future........  |
|
#34
May 21st, 2009, 06:36 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: SSUpdater.com Anti-Malware test
Quote:
We are fundamentally incompatible with how many of the testing organizations perform their tests, however some recent reviews/tests can be found at: http://pxnow.prevx.com/zeroL/PCMag_Review.pdf http://www.softpedia.com/reviews/win...w-112112.shtml http://www.prnewswire.co.uk/newsinde...ease?id=256969 http://www.infoworld.com/d/security-...s-evil-web-589 (this last one is about Prevx 2 using an older version of our community database, but its still a valid test) Note that the PC Magazine review is actually probably the first "correct" review of Prevx software because of their testing methodology. EDIT (for your edit  ): Quote:
The engine on VirusTotal is a very simplistic version of our engine and works only on a blacklist with limited heuristics. |
|
#36
May 21st, 2009, 07:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: SSUpdater.com Anti-Malware test
Quote:
For what it's worth, you may want to pick a different review to read if you want pertinent information on Prevx 3.0 as Prevx 3.0 was 100% rewritten from Prevx 2.0 (no code exists from the Prevx 2.0 days  ) |
|
#38
May 21st, 2009, 07:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: SSUpdater.com Anti-Malware test
Quote:
__________________
A Friend is Someone Who Reaches for Your Hand but Touches Your Heart
Microsoft® MVP Consumer Security Moderator-Beta Tester @ Outpost Users Support Forum |
|
#39
May 21st, 2009, 08:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SSUpdater.com Anti-Malware test
All I'll add to the great "is MBAM rubbish or not?" debate is: Let those that think it is avoid it like the plague,meanwhile the rest of us will carry on using it on heavily infected systems to great effect.
|
|
#40
May 21st, 2009, 08:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SSUpdater.com Anti-Malware test
Quote:
|
|
#41
May 22nd, 2009, 03:42 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: SSUpdater.com Anti-Malware test
Quote:
I have run several tests using Prevx, Avira, A2. Hitman, MBAM etc. Based on my experience, Prevx would not detect as many as Avira or A2 overall - particuarly with an on demand test as Prevx needs live infections to use its behavoural analysis. Also A2 and Avira will detect anything - even if it is not a current threat etc. See my post here re testing: http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showp...0&postcount=37 |
|
#43
May 22nd, 2009, 03:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSUpdater.com Anti-Malware test
Quote:
I think that's fair, but as you can see: It's called "Spyware Remover" at download.com |
|
#44
May 22nd, 2009, 05:16 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: SSUpdater.com Anti-Malware test
Quote:
|
|
#47
May 22nd, 2009, 05:37 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: SSUpdater.com Anti-Malware test
Quote:
Besides a lot of none sense, what I liked more about this "test" was when MikeNash justify that topic, at Wilders, with this!  |
|
#48
May 22nd, 2009, 05:42 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: SSUpdater.com Anti-Malware test
Quote:
The earth is flat etc. yawn..... |
|
#49
May 22nd, 2009, 05:44 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: SSUpdater.com Anti-Malware test
Quote:
Keep going this way my friend . |
|
#50
May 22nd, 2009, 05:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SSUpdater.com Anti-Malware test
Ok, lets see if I'm getting it right. Give me some help or information here.
From Emsisoft test thread, Andyman35 posted: Quote:
So does this mean that MBAM is useless (to say it someway) if you dont buy it? The realtime protection does not work, if you dont buy it, right? I mean if the scanner is not effective... |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
