Is Smart security realy so bad ?

ttttt1 · #1 May 5th, 2009, 10:29 AM

Look on this test

Code:

http://www.matousec.com/projects/proactive-security-challenge/results.php

can i believe it ?

Ade 1 · #2 May 5th, 2009, 11:45 AM

If you searched first before posting you'll find there are other threads relating to this test and ESS. I'm sure you'll find all the answers you need there.

ttttt1 · #3 May 5th, 2009, 11:57 AM

When you know about it,link me it then.

Najem1992 · #4 May 5th, 2009, 12:16 PM

Eset is the best security program and this is the answer to your question

Quote:

Originally Posted by stackz

It's been explained before, but basically the matousec tests are HIPS (host intrusion prevention system) tests. ESS anti-virus is disabled for the test so no chance of heuristic detection. ESS does not have HIPS (at least as far as the HIPS implementations used by the top scorers goes) and as long as it doesn't and the testing methodology remains the same, I'd expect similar results. Seriously if you're going test a security product, then test the entire product - not with half of it disabled.

ronjor · #5 May 5th, 2009, 12:18 PM

Do a search for matousec in this forum. Plenty of threads exist such as this one. >>

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=220332

This thread is closed.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search