DefenceWall and OA HIPS overlap

Many people seem to use both DW and Online Armor (paid) at the same time. Is there some significant benefit in it? OA HIPS has the "run safer" option which I believe is close or equivalent with DW´s untrusted processes in practise cause both are lowering the rights of the processes if I understood correctly.

Why use these programs together? Isn´t there much overlap also with other HIPS functions like keylogger detection?

Also, has anybody compared DW HIPS and OA (paid) HIPS against each others in real life testing?

I would understand if some Kerio or other pure firewall users want to add HIPS-functionality with DW, but I don´t quite understand why you would need/want DW, if you use OA paid which already has HIPS and "run safer" options?

 

It was explained to me that they will run nicely side by side, but might conflict with each other if there is an attempt to infect your computer. In this case, instead of having the protection of 2, you wind up with the protection of 1. I ran them together for about 10 days with no problems. I finally uninstalled DW in favor of OA.

 

Hello Juha,

i use both OA paid and DW. I use that combo because:
1. OA is a classical HIPS which i like,
2. I like idea of Banking Mode in OA,
3. OA is a firewall, DW not yet (in future will offer OP)

Since i have DW i never use Run Safer option in OA because DW offers it for me - restriction based policy. In my opinion DW protection is better (stronger) in this case.

As i mentioned - OA offers classical HIPS which will give you more details about any action on your computer.
DW offers 'smart' - very silent HIPS, which inform you about for example keyloggers, unauthorized access to protected datas, etc.

 

Downloaded files are contained in a limited environment by DW, OA focusses on processes, that is why people like to run them together (both user friendly), so you have got a double proctection

 

exactly and that's why i run DefenseWall and MalWare Dender(doble layer)

 

What's the CPU time usage running these two together?

 

In my case - 2 hours after reboot (~1h TV streaming, 1h browsing):

defensewall.exe - 2min 48sec
defensewall_serv.exe - 0min 0sec

oacat - 0min 0sec
oahlp - 0min 1sec
oasrv - 0min 20sec
oaui - 0min 42sec

opera.exe - 19min 7sec

 

Last time I played with OA run safer was basic like DropMyRights, sysInternal's psexec, wtc ........ simply running progs with LUA token for that particular instance, not when started as a child process of some other program

Defensewall or Geswall should be much stronger in this respect

 

I also am using DW along with OA paid. They seem to get along fine with only a very slight slowdown. Has anyone here been able to conclude thru testing that they will not conflict in the event of malware detection?

 

I did it. Please look at my video on YT:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRcxMhiHXGQ

 

Creer...thanks for the link to your video. That answered all my questions. It seems that the combination of OA plus DW should be just about impenetrable.

 

iin one of my pc's i use malware defender with defensewall and very ligth and tight security good job ilya and xiolin

 

You are welcome, I am glad i could help.
Yes, exactly, thats why i very like this combo - it gives me peace of mind without any additional resident AV or AS/AM - simply the best

 

I am curious...did you by chance test while using run safer to see what would happen with DW?

 

Not yet because with installed DW i have never used Run Safer mode which is implemented in OA - this is unnecessary in my point of view. I can only imagine that with Run Safer enabled and DW installed - still everything should be ok, without any negative impact.

 

Oh and i didn't mentioned that i have disabled in OA two modules, i mean Web Shield and Mail Shield.

 

So you disabled those features in OA and are using DW to replace that protection? Then in essense OA and DW aren't truly running side by side.

 

Correct i disabled both of them because with OA WebShield i noticed slow down during browsing Internet via my browsers, Web Shield takes also much higher CPU time when it is enabled.
Mail Shield i disabled because i don't need this... mostly i use webmail or just use WLM.
On the other hand - yes i also believe that DW covers me very well on this protection level.
Please note that when i was running OA with all shields enabled along side with DW i didn't notice any issues.

 

I installed the final release version, 3.5.0.9 and now I have some slowdown issues. Release Candidate 3.5.0.6 worked great but now there seems to be a conflict of sorts.

 

Yes i know what you mean, in my opinion 3.5.0.6 was a bit lighter than final release 3.5.0.9.
Did you try disable DW protection and than check if any slowdowns are still there? Or if you have enabled Web Shield - disable them and than checked with DW enabled.

 

I am also getting longer boot times. If I disable DW the slowdowns are not as significant but still there. I have also disabled OA's web shield and mail shield. For the time being, I am going back to 3.5.0.6.

 

Well i noticed significant slowdowns only in one case - at the beginning after installation OA and that was because OA blocked one DW service (defensewall_srv.exe) make sure you have this service running. Maybe this is the reason... i have no idea