SpywareBlaster 4.2 released!

[Page42]

Thanks for v4.2, Javacool. SpywareBlaster has always been a trusted, needed program on my computers.

[wris]

I had version 4.1 Spywareblaster and tried updating to 4.2. I had read recommendations that you should shut down spywareblaster, uninstall it through add/remove in control panel, and install newly-downloaded file.

I wish I had read your forum about not having to uninstall, because now I have NO protection.

I uninstalled the old version and tried to install Version 4.2, but get this warning: Unable to execute file in the temporary directory. Setup aborted. Error 5: Access is denied. I had downloaded the new version to my desktop, had turned off both antivirus and firewall and was disconnected from the internet while trying to install the files.

I have deleted the downloaded file and re-downloaded a few times and keep getting the error messages. I did notice when I went into windows explorer that there was still a folder for Spywareblaster, with a couple of files, even after removing spywareblaster from the control panel, and I sent that to my recycle bin.

Any idea how I can get this program back on my computer.
Windows XP Home, IE7. I tried reinstalling the older version and get the same error.

[Victek123]

Originally Posted by wris

I had version 4.1 Spywareblaster and tried updating to 4.2. I had read recommendations that you should shut down spywareblaster, uninstall it through add/remove in control panel, and install newly-downloaded file.

I wish I had read your forum about not having to uninstall, because now I have NO protection.

I uninstalled the old version and tried to install Version 4.2, but get this warning: Unable to execute file in the temporary directory. Setup aborted. Error 5: Access is denied. I had downloaded the new version to my desktop, had turned off both antivirus and firewall and was disconnected from the internet while trying to install the files.

I have deleted the downloaded file and re-downloaded a few times and keep getting the error messages. I did notice when I went into windows explorer that there was still a folder for Spywareblaster, with a couple of files, even after removing spywareblaster from the control panel, and I sent that to my recycle bin.

Any idea how I can get this program back on my computer.
Windows XP Home, IE7. I tried reinstalling the older version and get the same error.

.
Try using Ccleaner to delete the internet cache and also the Windows temp files. You can also run Disk Cleanup which may catch a few files that Ccleaner misses. Last, actually check the C:\windows\temp folder and your profile temp folder ( for XP look in "C:\documents and settings\your name\local settings\temp" and make sure it's empty (If you use Explorer you will have to unhide hidden files and system files in Folder Options to find these folders). Then try to reinstall.

[act8192]

Originally Posted by javacool

Hi,
To help us out: would those who use Opera mind posting what version they're running? (i.e. Can I assume most of you are using the latest Opera release?)

Best regards and thanks,

-Javacool

Opera 9.62 here. XP-Pro-SP3 and XP-home-SP3.

But, while a vital necessity for IE, why do we need it for Opera which can block all scripts or block on a per-site basis. I suppose I'm missing something here. I don't think ActiveX applies to Opera. What don't I understand?

Originally Posted by act8192

I suppose I'm missing something here. I don't think ActiveX applies to Opera. What don't I understand?

I'm using Firefox 3, what advantages do I get with SpywareBlaster 4.2?

[raven211]

Originally Posted by act8192

Opera 9.62 here. XP-Pro-SP3 and XP-home-SP3.

But, while a vital necessity for IE, why do we need it for Opera which can block all scripts or block on a per-site basis. I suppose I'm missing something here. I don't think ActiveX applies to Opera. What don't I understand?

Dangerous scripts still work on Opera, even if ActiveX is not there. Do you mean block ALL scripts? Cause then you can't use any, and that feels like an uncomfortable solution. SpywareBlaster would probably make blocking of dangerous scripts when protecting Opera-users, which many on these forums actually seems to be, incl. me.

[Longboard]

Thank you.

[txakura]

OK, so I may not have done this right...

I got extremely irked by the screen that wants you to select some download that I really didn't want. Instead, I just posted a "donation" from Paypal ($10). That got rid of the irksome screen and allowed me to download the new version. However, since I donated more than $9.95, don't I now get a license? I can't see how to get from where I am to having the license.

Any help would be appreciated.

BTW, I've been an extremely satisfied user of SpywareBlaster for a long time - V2 maybe? And although I've gone through some other "big deal" software, to make sure I have a handle on spyware/virus junk, I've never even thought of no longer using SpywareBlaster.

Originally Posted by raven211

Dangerous scripts still work on Opera, even if ActiveX is not there.

Eh?

[Neustradamus]

Hello,

Can you add Opera, Orca Browser, Safari, Chrome ?

Thanks in advance,

Regards,

Neustradamus

[raven211]

Originally Posted by ance

Eh?

It's not a secret that scripts can still run on Opera, or whatever it's called... What is it you don't get?

ActiveX on Opera?

[raven211]

Originally Posted by ance

ActiveX on Opera?

I said... "even if ActiveX is NOT there"

[tipstir]

Great program, but can you add m.webtrends.com to your block list for bad cookies trackers. Also anyway I can add my own list..

[mismi]

I updated SpywareBlaster 4.1 by disabling all protection, then uninstalling 4.1 then downloading the 4.2 setup file.

Now I`m having problems when trying to run the SpywareBlaster 4.2 setup file.
I get: spywareblastersetup42.exe is not a valid Win32 application

What do I need to do to correct this?

I`ve never had a problem with SpywareBlaster and definitely do not want to be without it now.

Please help.

Thank you much.

[mgroeger]

The other day I updated to version 4.2 and right at that time i picked up some form of the Conficker virus. Don't know how but i did and it coincided with when i downloaded 4.2. So I used Malwarebytes to get rid of the virus and uninstalled 4.2 and then reinstalled it. It installs just fine but I can not run it. Even when I install and it asks would you like to run now and I say yes it does not pop the tool up. It does nothing.

So i downloaded version 4.1 and it runs just fine but obviously I can not update it as it tells me to download version 4.2. I have tried repeatedly but no luck. Any ideas?

[N2thuWild]

O.K., here is the dumbest question of the day. I installed SpywareBlaster 4.2 and I have never used it before. The program says all things are protected but how do you tell if it is working?

[Page42]

Great question... certainly not dumb! I always took the program's word for it. But you could do this...
Try accessing any of the sites that are restricted. I tried three real quick...
Netvenda.com
NewTopSites.com
Antispyshield.com
IE7 would not load any of them.
Edit in: Javacool's Knowledgebase has you covered... How do I know that SpywareBlaster® is working?

[N2thuWild]

Thanks SO much Page42, first for the great information and second for making me feel better about my question.
OOPS !! Got as far as the second one and Firefox loaded it. Uh Oh!! And I think WOT stopped the first one.

[Page42]

I believe that what is happening (in some cases) is that SpywareBlaster doesn't block the site (like a hosts file) but does prevent the blocked items from installing on your computer. I'm glad you asked the question because perhaps now we'll both get a better explanation.

[MikeBCda]

To the best of my memory, SB's Firefox protection is limited to cookies. Firefox doesn't use active-x, after all.

In IE, the primary protection is against installing and running active-x baddies. Plus the restricted-sites protection, which designates a great many sites as restricted so that while you can usually go to them (the urls themselves aren't blocked), they're set to the highest possible level of security so that very little can be loaded or activated there.

Originally Posted by MikeBCda

To the best of my memory, SB's Firefox protection is limited to cookies. Firefox doesn't use active-x, after all.

So there is no need for SpywareBlaster with Firefox?

[raven211]

Originally Posted by ance

So there is no need for SpywareBlaster with Firefox?

Guess not really... but sometimes, atleast I think, you gotta use IE, and IE8 has some very nice protection features (see remove-malware.com and scroll down and you should see it), but I also thought there are "scripts" that can run, even if they're not ActiveX based? Is that not true? Alteast that's what I recall when always using Opera like I do for a long time.

Originally Posted by raven211

but I also thought there are "scripts" that can run, even if they're not ActiveX based? Is that not true?

I don't know, but if SpywareBlaster "only" blocks ActiveX and Cookies then there is no need for it when using Firefox.

Javacool?!

[raven211]

Originally Posted by ance

I don't know, but if SpywareBlaster "only" blocks ActiveX and Cookies then there is no need for it when using Firefox.

Javacool?!

Yes, I would personally say that's correct. Cookies are close to completely harmless - it's more of a personal opinion how dangerous the user thinks it's. If not, then I think they can skip SpywareBlaster, cause I don't think restricted sites apply to FF as well, but correct if I'm wrong.