![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi everyone! Look at this!
Checkvir.com 10-2003, Heuristics av-test: http://www.checkvir.com/index.php?CN=3.3.19&CIE=1 Summary report: www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9295666~mode=flat "The truth is out there, but it hurts!" Best regards, Firefighter! Added URL tags - Pieter http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=19869
__________________
Some savolax answer to the southern man: Q. No onko viiruksia näkynyt? A. No voe tokkiisa. Just äskönnii oes männynnä yks vuan en ehtinnä nähä. Tuolta saanan takkoo se männä jölököttel suorraah järvvee letit hulumuteh! |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
ROFL Bullstuff
![]() Did you take a look at the used virus samples ? muhahahaha ![]() I consider this as a joke ![]() edited to keep the language clean - Detox
__________________
www.wildlist.org - the world's premier source of information on which viruses are spreading In the Wild |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
To Godzilla from Firefighter!
What I saw about the testbed in checkvir.com site that wasn't updated, because it seems to be in quick view the same as year 2002 testbed. But there is said that those 27 files were ITW in 10-2003 test. "The truth is out there, but it hurts!" Best regards, Firefighter!
__________________
Some savolax answer to the southern man: Q. No onko viiruksia näkynyt? A. No voe tokkiisa. Just äskönnii oes männynnä yks vuan en ehtinnä nähä. Tuolta saanan takkoo se männä jölököttel suorraah järvvee letit hulumuteh! |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
A joke? You are easily amused, I think. Ah well... heur today, Guam to Maui. ![]()
__________________
Primo freebeez: TinyWatcher POP Peeper Kalender |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maybe i am totally dumb, but i did not understand the numbers on checkvir. Are those numbers detected or missed viruses ?
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
you're not the only one ![]() |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
To everyone from Firefighter!
Maybe this link clarifies something to you? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9295666~mode=flat So, those numbers were the detected ones! I've got DrWeb licence since 19. September 2002, so I think that the checked heurististic test was made about new VIRUS files from between 22. November 2002 and 11. August 2003, that's very possible, because it takes some time to collect over 1100 new VIRUS files from an independent institution that is not a virus collector! The heuristics results were tested with DrWeb 4.29a version launched about 22. November 2002 and so must those versions of other programs be from! The link about the testbed mentioned in that checkvir.com 10-2003 site have to be a bug, because it was the same as it was in the 4-2002 av-test. Otherways, how it is possible that all those av:s were almost uncapable to detect those files from 4-2002, if they were detected with updated versions after 7. April 2003? "The truth is out there, but it hurts!" Best regards, Firefighter!
__________________
Some savolax answer to the southern man: Q. No onko viiruksia näkynyt? A. No voe tokkiisa. Just äskönnii oes männynnä yks vuan en ehtinnä nähä. Tuolta saanan takkoo se männä jölököttel suorraah järvvee letit hulumuteh! |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|