![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
A friend's computer got hit pretty bad, so she called me up to come over and fix it up, well to my shock I installed Nod32 v3 to help out, and I was really shocked and how crappy a job it did at detections, not only did it miss a few trojans, but it missed a hell of a lot of spyware/malware too.
To say the least I was very unhappy with the results, and when I saw how poorly it did for me in the detection department, I was really saying to myself I think it's time to look somewhere else. How well is v3 doing at detections for everything it's suppose to be detecting compared to other AVs out there right now? THANKS |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
To strictly answer the question you posed: pretty run-of-the-mill, and Eset can drag its feet horribly with adding detections.
I suggest you contact Eset support to help with the missed malware. I could recommend some other products with superior detection, but unfortunately none of them are very helpful at cleanup either AFAIK. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It has the same detection as version 2.7 which always performs well at av comparatives ,though personally i think its ad/spyware detection isnt that good at all.Id be more inclined to worry about version 3s bugs at present rather than its detection,and that stops me from using it even though i have a licence. ellison |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well from what I've seen of v3 I'm staying clear on my box, and I installed for my own usage right now Avira AntiVir PE Premium, so I'll see how it plays out later if I like it or not.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sorry DasFox but We don't do comparison type threads.
General Policy Statement - Antivirus Section Quote:
__________________
Wilders - Terms of Service · Site FAQ · Searching the forum easier · The Art of Quoting in Posts |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|