![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am very great attitude for AD so far and put all trust on his AD/RD. So far, AD1.200alpha can not work on DEll box (at least E501) anyway. My hard-earning paid to ProcessGuard unlimit-home license has been useless with new way of attacking techniques for which PG can provide for the reason of PG developer left it away.
Whileas, I put mine on KIS7 license and working great, at least KIS7 gets its anti-leaktest level of most to be excellent position at advance settings, besides its #1 malware detection/protections. KIS7 comes with complete rewritten Network driver providing most very small margin of network performance degration of less than < 2% hit compared to normal network performance, and 50-70% hit of KIS6 network performance. Which one should be first choice to provide to most system protections and system safe to network/internet users ? or both must be in place. TIA
__________________
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well theyre different programs. AD/RD is just a HIPS whereas KIS is a full blown suite.
KIS's PDM does include some features of AD/RD though, so id just use KIS.
__________________
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Can you give details differences from each to each. Thx
__________________
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Im unfamiliar with Kaspersky PDM, so I cant really answer that for you.
But I *think* on difference is that the PDM lacks teh program execution prompts of AD (and other HIPS).
__________________
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Using both together would excellent, i'd configure AD's default rules so it wouldn't overlap with any functions of KIS.
__________________
Pryon G930V2 Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit Norton 360 v6 Sandboxie |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|