|
|
#1
March 14th, 2007, 07:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
166 vs 173
I have used build 173 for awhile now and have forgotten why I upgraded. I know about the compressed snapshots, which I never use, and the VSS plus minor commandline changes 173 contains but is it really worth the upgrade from 166? I recently reverted to RSS and see no difference other than I can now use other virtual shadow programs along side of FDISR. Any comments or advice?
Thanks, Sourmilk out
__________________
You might be a geek if you have a junkyard full of extra computer parts in your garage. 
|
|
#2
March 14th, 2007, 08:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 166 vs 173
I still use build 166, because space isn't a problem on my computer.
I can't do anything more with build 173, than saving space. I'm waiting for other improvements, like schedules on demand without password and ... I never read anything about schedules in this forum, I think nobody wants them, because they aren't practical enough.
__________________
ErikAlbert Security = WinXPproSP3 Firewall + Anti-Executable + DefenseWall HIPS * Recovery = ShadowProtect + FirstDefense-ISR Malware Survival Rate = 0.00%, but each malware has my sympathy. 
|
|
#3
March 14th, 2007, 08:36 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 166 vs 173
Quote:
Thanks for the reply. I wish they could have more than one frozen snap and or encryption for the regular snaps. But, until then, I think I will reinstall 166. Thanks again. Sourmilk out
__________________
You might be a geek if you have a junkyard full of extra computer parts in your garage.
|
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
