ShadowProtect (Trial/Evaluation) what's the difference?

Discussion in 'backup, imaging & disk mgmt' started by Genady Prishnikov, Mar 8, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Hi lodore

    I think it is very much machine dependent. On my newest machine which is a high end gaming type machine, my c: drive is 18.9gig. Both the imaging and restoring time are right at 5 minutes. Plus the boot time to the CD for the restore.

    Pete
     
  2. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,065
    that is way faster than ATI 9 is
    does one license mean you can only backup one pc?
    because if i buy shadow protect desktop and use it on my pc im gonna build soon then i might use it on my other pc for imaging as well but only if its legal in the license
    lodore
     
  3. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    IFW/IFD used to be my standard, but I don't think they would have withstood the rigors of some stuff I've done.

    For example prior to test image the system.

    Then shrink the partition, and restore an image from another non simliar system. Get system running, sort of, and then go and shrink the partition some more, and slide it around on the disk.

    Then do a restore of the original image. In testing this kind of mess, I found IFD/IFW marginal. Shadow protect on the other hand but the system back like it started.

    Since I've been using and testing SP, I've probably done over 200 restores on my 2 systems. Never once a hickup.

    Pete
     
  4. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    I believe the license allows use only on one machine.
     
  5. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,065
    what do you store your images on?
    external usb?
    or a second internal drive?
    lodore
     
  6. HAN

    HAN Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Posts:
    2,098
    Location:
    USA
    I can't disagree but IFD is solid. It has never failed me yet. It's very handy to have an IFD image on DVD for offsite storage.
     
  7. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Hi Lodore

    Both

    Pete
     
  8. Longboard

    Longboard Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Posts:
    3,238
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    ping grnxnm:

    I'm sure this has been raised before: why cant you develop a plugin for a non MS/Win PE. There are as we all know lots of bootable PE cd set-ups and many have plugins for other imaging tools.

    LOL, I just bet there is a really basic answer to this.
    Apologies if this is a retard Q. :blink:

    That is an interesting tidbit about doing restores and images outside of Win. :)

    Version 3 ??

    Regards.

    PS:
    Yes you can keep your Terabyte tools while using SP. ? slightly redundant.
    Pete's point is that he has moved to a different strategy/tools now that work better for him.
    The MBR can be copied with TU or there is a tool for writing a standard MBR.

    The only other issue is the ongoing FDISR conflicts that afaik is resolved with using RSS and is under review. ( hmm by Raxco at least :cautious: )

    For straight image/restore SP may be a better tool. I'v just got so used to using the TU. Never failed here either. Compatible at every level with FDISR
     
  9. HAN

    HAN Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Posts:
    2,098
    Location:
    USA
    Well, I bought ShadowProtect! (2 actually.)

    After my first image, I am pretty impressed. I ran the image from the Recovery Disk (outside of Windows.) 11 Gig imaged in about 10 minutes to a USB 2.0 portable HD. I mounted the image as read-only and could explore the image quite fast. Honestly faster than I thought it might work.

    I'll still use my good 'ole Image for DOS to burn DVD images once in a while but SP is fast enough I can no longer justify the extra time IFD takes to create an image to a HD. (Of course, I could burn the SP images I create to DVDs too but it can't be a bad idea to not keep all my eggs in one basket. :) )

    I'm still a little unsure whether I'll bother with the Windows installation. I don't have huge system changes on my PCs and I like to keep things on the minimal side.

    The only negative thing that happened was that the desktop installer file and the Recover Disk iso file both downloaded with no file extensions. It took me a couple minutes to realize they were zip files. But once I renamed them, all was well.
     
  10. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    When I started with SP, I did the same thing. Kept images from other programs. I've stopped. I am not sure I'd do some of the stuff I do with the others. I had the same thing happen on a different site as to downloads. Turned out to be a browser thing.

    I am also like you Han, I don't tend to keep the desktop version installed. I like keeping my system clean.

    Pete
     
  11. Genady Prishnikov

    Genady Prishnikov Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Posts:
    350
    I'm confused. What's the "desktop version" as opposed to whatever you do? It's a portable app without need for installation? This is sounding more interesting with every post.
     
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2007
  12. grnxnm

    grnxnm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Posts:
    391
    Location:
    USA
    @longboard

    StorageCraft doesn't develop or support any plugins for non-Microsoft WinPE look-alikes such as BartPE. This was a business decision.

    We've made some very substantial changes to the recovery environment as far as device support goes so users will soon have even more flexibility on that front and really shouldn't ever need to resort to an environment other than the one we provide.

    @Genady

    The installed app includes the installation of StorageCraft's snapshot device driver (stcvsm.sys) which is able to take extremely fast incremental backups (often a matter of seconds). If you want scheduled/automated backups, or want fast incremental backups, then you will want to actually install ShadowProtect. All versions of ShadowProtect also include a recovery environment CD (bootable CD based on WinPE) that can be used to both backup and restore volumes, including restoring backup images to new blank disks (so called "Bare Metal Recovery") for disaster recovery. For users that prefer to not install anything, they can still do backup using ShadowProtect by booting the recovery environment CD and backing up from within that environment. Some users perfer this as it keeps thing clean (nothing to install) and also captures their volume(s) state(s) while there is absolutely no activity on the volume(s).

    I noticed you've enjoyed using the DriveImage/Ghost product. You may find it interesting to note that StorageCraft's CTO was the architect of that version of DriveImage that was rebranded as Ghost by Symantec when they acquired PowerQuest. It (and all succeeding version of DriveImage/V2i Protector/LiveState Recovery/Backup Exec Recovery) use StorageCraft's stcvsm.sys snapshot driver (older versions of it - renamed to pqv2i.sys or symsnap.sys - check the file attributes copyright information to verify). I was also personally involved in the development of several of the core aspects of that product. At the time that Symantec acquired PowerQuest, several key people left the company. A year later they began development of a competing product (ShadowProtect). You generally do things better the second time around, and I think this is such a case. Rigorous tests will reveal to any interested party that ShadowProtect is generally faster, uses fewer resources, and is more robust, than the competition. For a more detailed comparison, see this post.

    That being said, no product or solution is the end-all-and-be-all of backup. Do your own due diligence and pick the solution that best fits your needs. Hopefully you can find one for free. :)
     
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2007
  13. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,065
    hello grnxnm,
    i want to ask you one question
    atm i have a license for acronis true image 9 and a license for ghost 2003
    can i get money off shadow protect desktop for kinda trading in one of those licenses or even both?
    thanks
    lodore
     
  14. grnxnm

    grnxnm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Posts:
    391
    Location:
    USA
    There used to be a competitive upgrade offer, but I no longer see it on the StorageCraft website so perhaps it is not available at the moment.
     
  15. Genady Prishnikov

    Genady Prishnikov Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Posts:
    350
    @grnxnm: Thank you for that great post, that cleared up some things for me. This sounds like an excellent product.

    Color me VERY impressed that you were involved with PowerQuest DriveImage 2002. I love that version and the last PQ version of PartitionMagic. Symantec messed around with both and I have kept using those both of those last PQ products regularly.

    However......sounds like ShadowProtect will be my next purchase. Thanks again for the great post!
     
  16. HAN

    HAN Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Posts:
    2,098
    Location:
    USA
    My favorable impression of SP continues...

    I imaged my other XP PC that is just under 7GB. It took just under 7 minutes (again to an external USB 2.0 drive.) I then imaged the same PC using Image for DOS to the same external drive. It took just under 18 minutes.

    I then restored back to the PC from the SP image. I did not overwrite the MBR or the hidden track/Track 0. Recovery took about 6.5 minutes and the PC booted normally. Which is what it's all about!


    I do have a question (to anyone that can answer...) I did not see anything that notes where I could make an image verification (which, for example, IFD can perform.) The manual mentions exploring the image as a method to accomplish this, but I am wondering if there is something going on in the background as the image is made that allows SP to know the process has completed successfully. (This may be a better question to ask over at StorageCraft.)
     
  17. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Hi Han

    What I do on restore is routinely delete the volume after selecting the image. I then let SP re create the partition from the image. I always restore the image MBR and track 0. It does this at the end of the restore and adds virtually no time.

    On the verify, there is a cmd line way to do this now with the Desktop install. It is supposed to be in the GUI, in version 3.0. I've stopped worrying about verifying the image anyway. What I do is image, then mount the image, and browse and pull a file out of the image. If that goes well, I do a restore. I actually restore every image I take to test it. This would beg the question what if the restore fails. First it hasn't, but what I would do is restore an earlier image, and use my FDISR archive to bring myself current. For me FDISR is an integral part of my recovery scheme. But SP has proven to be rock solid.

    Pete
     
  18. Longboard

    Longboard Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Posts:
    3,238
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    @grnxnm (again sorry :cool: )

    The term "Bare metal Recovery": Could you elaborate a bit.
    What exactly does this mean?
    Will this protect against HD/HW failure in a single box?

    Are you talking about a situation where an HD is unbootable; a new HD is installed ( ie different HW, different size, different manufacturer, unformatted etc ) Boot with recovery CD and an image can be restored to the new HD from back-up source, and it will just boot-up?

    This is what happened to me recently: primary work HD failed. Had images on external USB HD.
    Had to install new primary HD as above : all different: installed the HW then had to reinstall XPee and then restored image with good results. Have back-up redundancy with file copying to USB stick and so lost nothing. Whew.

    Unless I am completely stupid or SP has genie software: What about HAL, drivers, sysprep etc

    What if I had taken the option to get a whole new system: mobo, chipset, HD etc, plugged in my USB external HD and booted with the PE CD?
    Would SP restore to the new HD in the new system? Heh seriously "bare metal"

    Unless I am completely stoopid I am trying to learn from this.

    Might have to check RAID type solution but don't want to overload with HW atm.

    Sorry if you have addressed this before.

    Thx.

    PS i was asking before: when for V3 ?
     
    Last edited: Mar 11, 2007
  19. ejr

    ejr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2005
    Posts:
    538
    Question about Shadow Protect: I keep reading about "online backups". What if I don't want to do an online backup? I don't want to pay a monthly fee for backup services. Does Shadow Protect only funtion in this capacity?

    I want a reliable disc imaging program, that's it. I don't want my backup strategy relying on an internet connection. I don't want to buy the software then keep paying monthly fees. All I am doing is backing up one PC.

    Is Shadow Protect for me or not?
     
  20. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,065
    mixed termology.
    i will try to explain.
    an online backup means make the image in windows with the background services running. also known as hot imaging it has nothing to do with the internet.
    hope you understand that
    lodore
     
  21. ejr

    ejr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2005
    Posts:
    538
    I understand now. Thank you.
     
  22. Rilla927

    Rilla927 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    1,742
    Hi Grnxnm,

    Just a quick question. Since I purchased SP Desktop on Jan 24th 2007, will I have to pay for 3.0 version?

    Thanks,
     
  23. grnxnm

    grnxnm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Posts:
    391
    Location:
    USA
    @HAN

    All version of ShadowProtect automatically verify any image during restore using CRC32. If you want to verify an image separate from a restore operation you can only do this on the command line. As Pete mentioned, a GUI has been added for this separate verify operation in version 3.

    The command line to verify a base image is:

    sbrun.exe -mdn ( sbfile -r C_VOL-b001.spf : sbcrypt : sbrest )

    To verify a base plus some incrementals, do this:

    sbrun.exe -mdn ( sbset C_VOL-b001.spf C_VOL-b001-i001.spi C_VOL-b001-i002.spi : sbrest )

    *NOTE* - It is critical that you leave spaces before and after the ( ) and : characters when executing the above commands, otherwise they will return an error.

    @LONGHORN

    Bare Metal Restore/Recovery is the recovery of a volume to a system that has no operating system. The machine is "bare." It has only blank drive(s). Backup products that are capable of bare metal recovery are capable of restoring your backup images to new blank replacement disks, and also making the machine bootable as it once was. Any decent disaster recovery backup product will support bare metal recovery. The case you mentioned is a perfect candidate for BMR.

    BMR is for restore to the same machine. If you want to restore an image to a different machine (one with significantly different hardware such as a different chipset, different storage controller, etc) then you need to use additional functionality to patch all kinds of drivers (as you mentioned) and configuration settings. Acronis has such a feature, called "Univeral Restore." Symantec's equivalent is called "Restore to Anywhere." StorageCraft's is called Hardware Independent Restore, and has completed a very successful beta. If you would like to try out the Beta for this feature, send an email to support 'at' storagecraft.com and request to participate in the HIR beta program.

    We have not committed to a date for version 3's release. Much of it is finished, but we are still implementing some features.

    @ERJ

    The term "online backup" is sometimes confusing, as it's used to refer to two types of backup solutions:

    1) Backup that is capable of saving content of all files, even open files (when the file system and applications are "online").

    2) Backup that saves/stores your files on a remote machine.

    ShadowProtect falls into the first category. When ShadowProtect is referred to as an "online" backup product, it's probably better described as a "hot" backup product. It's capable of backing up your drive without booting to an alternate environment. It can backup your drive while it's hot/in-use/online.

    There is no service fee for the use of ShadowProtect. It's a standalone product and does not use the services of any remote machines. It does not use your internet connection (other than to activate at install time, and even then this is optional).

    If you install ShadowProtect then you will be able to create hot/live/online backups of your disks without rebooting and without stopping any of your apps. Hence there is no downtime for backups if ShadowProtect is installed. If you do not install ShadowProtect, you can still use the included bootable CD recovery environment to backup/restore your volumes, but you will have to stop your apps and reboot into this recovery environment to do so, which means that such a backup is not hot/live/online. Such a backup is often considered to be ideal as it will capture your volume state in its ideal not-in-use state.

    @RILLA927

    If you purchased maintenance when you bought ShadowProtect, and if version 3.0 releases before your maintenance expires, then you will receive version 3.0 free of cost. If you didn't purchase maintenance, I believe you will still be able to upgrade to version 3.0 for half the cost.
     
  24. ejr

    ejr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2005
    Posts:
    538
    How big was the image? How big of an external HD do you have?

    When I buy my next PC later thjis year, I will be migrating over to a product like Shadow Protect, Acronis, Paragon etc. I want to have some sort of idea how big of an external HD I will need to buy.
     
  25. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    When I image 18g the image is about 13gig. I have a 2nd internal drive of 320gig and an external of 500gig. Buy big they are cheap.

    Pete
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.