Wilders Security Forums  

Go Back   Wilders Security Forums > Security Products > other anti-malware software
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old January 27th, 2007, 05:19 AM
Accolite Accolite is offline
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 18
Default Current Stable ver of GreenBorder

Does anyone here have any experience with a current or recent version of GreenBorder or GB Pro +/-SafeFiles?

I know the dev post here so... I am looking for IMPARTIAL views please .

What are its pros and cons?
What is it like on system resources?
Is it compatible with Opera/K-Meleon? (They Claim FireFox and IE7 on their website, but I cannot find a FAQ, or anything about other browsers).

In one review I have read (which may not be completely exhaustive, see here) it was the only "sandbox" to get 100%. That being said, the test that SandBoxie failed to put it in 2nd place, IMO, was not one to worry about.

Which brings me to the next question...

How does it comapre with SandBoxie, or "insert alternative here"?

Last edited by Accolite : January 27th, 2007 at 05:28 AM.
  #2  
Old January 27th, 2007, 06:13 AM
trjam's Avatar
trjam trjam is offline
Incredibly Massive Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,637
Default Re: Curent Stable ver of GreenBorder

Current Stable ver of GreenBorder- I honestly dont think there has ever been one, has there?
  #3  
Old January 27th, 2007, 06:32 AM
Accolite Accolite is offline
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 18
Default Re: Curent Stable ver of GreenBorder

that good eh?

I had only just come across them from the article listed, which is why I asked. I mentioned stable, because I found the recent article about the Beta II.

However, that doesn't really answer any of my questions, but does suggest you disapprove.
  #4  
Old January 27th, 2007, 06:47 AM
trjam's Avatar
trjam trjam is offline
Incredibly Massive Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,637
Default Re: Curent Stable ver of GreenBorder

true.
Dislikes- everytime Antivir would start to do a scheduled scan it would be encompassed in the Greenborder Green, which is not good. After removing Greenborder, it leaves behind a folder in your documents and seetings, application data that they could not even remove. This kept Nod from scanning. Had to reformat so yes a little bitter.

Like- it works well for what it is designed for. I used it with Firefox and left IE open for updates. It kept all cookies and creme off very well..

Wont use it again though.
  #5  
Old January 27th, 2007, 07:13 AM
Accolite Accolite is offline
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 18
Default Re: Curent Stable ver of GreenBorder

well I may "trial" it on my laptop (non-critical). So if it does FUBAR it won't be a major.

Infact, I don't think I am running ANY security SW on my laptop ATM, so nothing for it to conflict with .

I certainly like the idea behind it. tTe idea of a visual border, I think is very good. It just depends on its implementation. I will try it with opera and see if it works.
  #6  
Old January 27th, 2007, 11:30 AM
Chuck57 Chuck57 is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 1,360
Default Re: Curent Stable ver of GreenBorder

Quote:
Originally Posted by trjam
true.
Dislikes- everytime Antivir would start to do a scheduled scan it would be encompassed in the Greenborder Green, which is not good. After removing Greenborder, it leaves behind a folder in your documents and seetings, application data that they could not even remove. This kept Nod from scanning. Had to reformat so yes a little bitter.

Like- it works well for what it is designed for. I used it with Firefox and left IE open for updates. It kept all cookies and creme off very well..

Wont use it again though.

I'm not sure if it's the same, but BufferZone leaves a folder behind as well. I was trialing NOD and as soon as I took BZ off my computer, NOD refused to update. Plus the NOD signature list reverted to the number it had when I first downloaded it. All I remember is it was something about a 'temp' file not being accessible. Everything worked fine until I removed BufferZone, about a week and a half into the NOD trial. I did not download or run NOD in Bufferzone, so can't claim that as a reason.
__________________
"If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police and the military.... Only the government - and the outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws." - Edward Abbey
  #7  
Old January 27th, 2007, 08:13 PM
simmikie simmikie is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 321
Default Re: Curent Stable ver of GreenBorder

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck57
I'm not sure if it's the same, but BufferZone leaves a folder behind as well. I was trialing NOD and as soon as I took BZ off my computer, NOD refused to update. Plus the NOD signature list reverted to the number it had when I first downloaded it. All I remember is it was something about a 'temp' file not being accessible. Everything worked fine until I removed BufferZone, about a week and a half into the NOD trial. I did not download or run NOD in Bufferzone, so can't claim that as a reason.

NOD should not be in the Bufferzone, as it cannot "see" confidential or trusted files. i ran Bufferzone & Nod32 (NOD being installed and running outside of the 'zone), with no scanning or update issues, even after uninstalling Bufferzone.

and to answer the original posters question: i can't, i have never used Greenborder, and after reading reviews here, i will stay clear of it. i do recommend Bufferzone Free for securing browsers, and it is compatible with Oprah 9.10. which is my browser of choice.

Mike
  #8  
Old January 27th, 2007, 10:40 PM
pilotart pilotart is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 377
Default Re: Curent Stable ver of GreenBorder

I removed BufferZone version 1.90 before installation of version 2.10 using the "Uninstall BufferZone" included on its Program files.

At the conclusion of the removal, the option was offered "to keep the virtual folders for your convenience" and since I would be installing the new version,
I did not remove them.

(Noticed that before installing BufferZone 2.10, that they no longer had red borders.)

AntiVir Classic's Guard Page shows scanning of all files opened within the BufferZone.
__________________
Dell D800 WinXP-pro AntiVirClassic ZoneAlarm BufferZone SpywareBlaster SpyBot Ad-Aware & Latitude LM p133 Win98feAntiVir&WebWasher
  #9  
Old January 28th, 2007, 07:37 PM
Accolite Accolite is offline
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 18
Default Re: Curent Stable ver of GreenBorder

thanks, i'll take a look at both sandboxie and bufferzone.
 

Wilders Security Forums > Security Products > other anti-malware software « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, Wilders Security Forums