Wilders Security Forums  

Go Back   Wilders Security Forums > Security Products > other anti-malware software
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old January 21st, 2007, 06:49 PM
acr1965's Avatar
acr1965 acr1965 is offline
Massive Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,432
Default Cyberhawk 2.01 vs. Anti-Keylogger Test

I just downloaded Cyberhawk 2.01 which runs as their pro version the first 15 days. Being that I was interested in rootkit detection, I then ran it against the AKLT. Here are my results:

GetKeyState- fail
GetAsyncKeyState- fail
DirectX- fail
Screenshot 1- fail
Screenshot 2- fail

Has anyone else had similar results? I noticed in a test of a prior version of Cyberhawk (1.2) it did well on the SSM keylogger.exe test.

http://www.techsupportalert.com/Secu...awk%20V1.2.htm
  #2  
Old January 21st, 2007, 07:05 PM
EASTER.2010
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Cyberhawk 2.01 vs. Anti-Keylogger Test

Don't know if they tested it like you did or not but i'm sure that could be a point of contention for some including the vendor?

NO matter for me though but only personally speaking, i use snoopfree now and it pretty much covers that area where say a SSM or Cyberhawk might prove a bit weak in, but those results might be disturbing if no HIPS can pass that simple test.
  #3  
Old January 21st, 2007, 07:06 PM
rdsu's Avatar
rdsu rdsu is offline
Massive Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: pt
Posts: 4,119
Default Re: Cyberhawk 2.01 vs. Anti-Keylogger Test

They already know about this test.

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=161731
  #4  
Old January 21st, 2007, 07:14 PM
acr1965's Avatar
acr1965 acr1965 is offline
Massive Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,432
Default Re: Cyberhawk 2.01 vs. Anti-Keylogger Test

Quote:
Originally Posted by EASTER.2010
Don't know if they tested it like you did or not but i'm sure that could be a point of contention for some including the vendor?

NO matter for me though but only personally speaking, i use snoopfree now and it pretty much covers that area where say a SSM or Cyberhawk might prove a bit weak in, but those results might be disturbing if no HIPS can pass that simple test.

That's why I added : "Has anyone else had similar results? I noticed in a test of a prior version of Cyberhawk (1.2) it did well on the SSM keylogger.exe test."

I just now saw on the thread provided by VaMPIRIC CRoW that some users have had noticed some Cyberhawk success with Cyberhawk vs. AKLT.
  #5  
Old January 22nd, 2007, 09:30 PM
yankinNcrankin's Avatar
yankinNcrankin yankinNcrankin is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 406
Default Re: Cyberhawk 2.01 vs. Anti-Keylogger Test

Cyberhawk 2.0.1.2 passes GetKeyState & GetAsyncKeyState on my box.

Cyberhawk 2.0.1.2 fails DirectX keylogger test even GhostSecuritySuite failed even though it flagged the service and I disallowed keys were still logged.

Cyberhawk 2.0.1.2 fails both Screenshot 1 & Screenshot 2 however Snoopfree is able to catch Screenshot 2 and one of the other keyloggers
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	snapshot.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	81.8 KB
ID:	187048  

  #6  
Old January 22nd, 2007, 10:22 PM
yankinNcrankin's Avatar
yankinNcrankin yankinNcrankin is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 406
Default Re: Cyberhawk 2.01 vs. Anti-Keylogger Test

Discovered a quirk on another comp of mine same OS XPproSP2. When I run the GetKeyState & GetAsyncKeyState Cyberhawk seems to fail until I stop typing and right click my mouse then left click then Cyberhawk pops up and warns me to Allow or Deny. Maybe its because my keyboard and mouse run from USB ? My other system have the mouse and keyboard plug into the designated inputs but this system don't have that type of inputs so it uses its USB wonder if that could be causing problem?
Both systems are identical in programs installed aside from the way the keyboard and mouse inputs.....Anyone got any ideas? about this quirk ?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	snap.jpg
Views:	3
Size:	143.8 KB
ID:	187049  


Last edited by yankinNcrankin : January 22nd, 2007 at 10:51 PM.
  #7  
Old January 22nd, 2007, 10:30 PM
JerryM JerryM is offline
Massive Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,971
Default Re: Cyberhawk 2.01 vs. Anti-Keylogger Test

Looks as if I am not going to trial Cyberhawk anytime soon.
Jerry
__________________
Laptop W 7 64 bit - Avast Pro 8, W 7 Firewall, Win Patrol Pro, and MBAM Pro in real time.
Desktop W7 64 bit -KIS 2013, Win Patrol Pro, and MBAM Pro in real time.
  #8  
Old January 23rd, 2007, 04:08 AM
RejZoR's Avatar
RejZoR RejZoR is offline
Polymorphic Sheep
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Europe/Slovenia/Ljubljana
Posts: 5,363
Default Re: Cyberhawk 2.01 vs. Anti-Keylogger Test

Minimize the tester tool window and type something. Cyberhawk is detecting only keyloggs that are hidden from user, probably to decrease false alerts...
__________________
RejZoR's Little Secrets
  #9  
Old January 23rd, 2007, 11:54 AM
yankinNcrankin's Avatar
yankinNcrankin yankinNcrankin is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 406
Default Re: Cyberhawk 2.01 vs. Anti-Keylogger Test

RejZoR ok I did what you said and upon minimizing the AKLT tester Cyberhawk instantly pop up with deny or allow so I guess in that scenario it works, but still I would like to think it would still detect even if it wasnt minimized, Im just looking at the AKLT window as a sub for some open text document etc. etc. thats why sometimes these tests kind of make me go
I guess what I'm trying to say is maybe you would need to get a real life hack attack from some one that could actually do what the test is trying to do and get your answer there lol too bad I dont know anyone that could do that, that I could trust
 

Wilders Security Forums > Security Products > other anti-malware software « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, Wilders Security Forums