![]() |
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't doubt it.But i think rootkit detection isn't yet a "must",so companies haven't been investing too much time on them.If rootkits start becoming common threat,AV companies will have to respond.And they will either end up with something like RKU or something more simple.The average user can't possibly understand what Icesword or RKU is showing him.So either the av companies will come up with something simple or it will be the doom for many many people ,that will be happily running rootkits in their PCs all the time. |
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
|
Blacklight is the best AV company rootkit scanner IMHO - and it can remove safely, but then it has been available for a long time. FSecure was ahead of all the others, and they saw the need.
The thing is with Vista, many of the current ARKS are unnecessary and incompatible. I don't believe there is a Vista rootkit yet..... Once people migrate to Vista (very gradually), then what will we use? You know sooner or later a Vista rootkit will appear.
__________________
Zorra |
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well from what i seen posted so far i suppose i can chalk gmer up to not capable to function properly on ServicePack 1 because most of you with SP 2 report gmer runs fine.
@gmer It would i think be of common practice before any your releases to add a resource to your program? Such as a real icon. I see some will have to wait untill another day/release when gmer is compiled with another language or otherwise offered by different builds because it clearly does not offer any detections for me if it cannot respond as expected. |
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
|
@EASTER
Thanks. I will try to find what the problem is. Sorry that it takes so much time . ( BTW: I also works on XP SP1 ) Quote:
Quote:
And now they have a lot of proof of concept and real samples and I believe that they will improve their products. Look what happened last year: 2005: F-Secure Blacklight 2006: Kaspersky 6.0 NOD 2.7 McAfee Rootkit Detective Sophos AntiRootkit TrendMicro RootkitBuster BitDefender Rootkit Uncover Panda AntiRootkit Avira AntiRootkit It will be only harder to hide in the future. BTW. In old DOS times we had "stealth" technique and now the same is called by a new name ![]() Quote:
I would follow Mark Russinovich's thouth - run as much ARKs as you can. and I would add: Do not trust only one ! Regards -Gmer |
|
#55
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Zorra |
|
#56
|
||||
|
||||
|
What program do you all consider to be the best anti-rootkit?
none, yet. ![]()
__________________
Eset Antivirus |
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
|
but Avira has one close to being ready, and it is very good. But that shouldnt surprise anyone considering how good their AV is.
__________________
Eset Antivirus |
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Well, if you have only "1" that you have proven that you can trust which does an incredible lot to uncover hiddens, in-line hooks, drivers, processes and what have ya, what other choice is there? Find a rootkit maker out there someplace and then combine it with the latest RAT maker/tools and put something together that "melts" it's loader AFTER its unloaded the payload and then go off in search of those "hidden" files/drivers/processes that you personally named ON YOUR OWN TEST SYSTEM (of course), with all the ARK's you can pull off the net, i think the number of ACCURATE finds you'll come up with them are VERY LIMITED at best indeed, at least for now, and drastically reduces your choices to only a couple? few? one? This is why i have made a quality choice with RKUnhooker. To date, it as reliable as i been able to acquire of any ARK and is Extremely Stable! which for any system, especially if RootKitted, legit or not, is very important. |
|
#59
|
||||
|
||||
|
What about AV antirootkits, I see only BlackLight, all others (including Avira, what a joke, not ARK) will die, as it happened with BitDefender Rootkit Uncover.
Instead of following doubtful suggestions I can say that it is only one strong method of detection - bootable CD (for NTFS) or diskette (for FAT32).
__________________
Ring0 - the source of inspiration |
|
#60
|
||||
|
||||
|
I tried RKUnhooker and am very impressed with its functions and features:
Clean GUI, SFX, inline hook detection (great), tie-in to Windows properties dialog, file wipe, etc, etc. However, I had a problem doing the hidden/blocked files scan which I assume is similar to Rootkit Revealer's high to low-level disk comparison. Anyway, the scan went along fine. When it was finished, I could not create the report because I got the following error - and RKU closed as soon as I clicked OK. Maybe you are familar with this occurence and have an easy solution or workaround: http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y12...miss-error.jpg
__________________
Zorra |
|
#61
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
@EASTER I'm still looking the reason ... http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...ootkit+scan%22 |
|
#62
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Put WINSTA.DLL in the main program folder, then reboot your system. It is known bug, but it is unknown why this happens.
__________________
Ring0 - the source of inspiration |
|
#63
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Zorra |
|
#64
|
||||
|
||||
|
I copied winsta.dll to C:\RkUnhooker, rebooted and rescanned for hidden items. This time the GUI closed automatically at the end of the scan. I didn't get the error window but all I saw was the desktop.
Are any other fixes known for this? The scan proceeds fine - the problem occurs right when the scan is complete.
__________________
Zorra |
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Hi Controler, How long does it take you to restore and be ready to operate each day ? Thanks, Jerry
__________________
Laptop W 7 64 bit - Avast Pro 8, W 7 Firewall, Win Patrol Pro, and MBAM Pro in real time. Desktop W7 64 bit -KIS 2013, Win Patrol Pro, and MBAM Pro in real time. |
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Well then looks like i will have to wait yet again for some next or alternate release and then if or when you can get around to this again by all means drop a hint right here to this thread/topic that it's available when ready. I normally would dismiss entirely, any program that exhibits such chaotics behavior but have read enough posts where others say it performs fine for their PC systems, well good for them i say but something just is not functional right from my vantage point with this app. |
|
#67
|
||||
|
||||
|
Gmer is pointing out that it runs on XP fine. If SSM conflicts with RKU, why not with Gmer, on your machine at least, somehow... If not SSM, maybe other, or something specific in your system. Without further information, he can't do much.
__________________
The GNU Operating System - The GNU Project / Linux Kernel - Linux Foundation / Debian GNU/Linux Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) / The Free Software Foundation (FSF) / Creative Commons (CC) / Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) / Free Software Magazine |
|
#68
|
|||
|
|||
|
I already offered security programs running when clicking gmer.exe and so theres nothing more to offer; no info, data, or otherwise. System Info listed also.
I point out specifically that "ALL" other ARK's start up and run fine, stable without flickering, jumping, or slow to no responding tabs. Those are issues i see each and every release. WHY? Who Knows? but Riddle Me This Batman. Think fast: There's an electric train traveling south. The wind is from the north-west. In which direction would the smoke from the train be blowing? |
|
#69
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
@EASTER There is also another way you can go. It can be a little difficult for you but it's possible . 1) try to turn off your security programs one after one ( the best options is the Start key related with service|driver ) Code:
3) start GMER. 4) goto (1) After that we should see where the conflict is . Thanks. BTW. To turn off Kaspersky you have to restore SSDT first. Last edited by gmer : February 24th, 2007 at 05:42 AM. |
|
#70
|
||||
|
||||
|
@Someone
SSM do not conflict with RKU since RC3. It the case of buggy GMER flickering can be related to Shadow SDT Hooks that are installed by SSM and Kaspersky AV.
__________________
Ring0 - the source of inspiration |
|
#71
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Please tell, you mean Hidden Files Scan ? Does scan performs well individually on each page? RKU version? Thanks
__________________
Ring0 - the source of inspiration |
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Thank You! EP_X0FF Since RKUnhooker is never exhibited such behavior then that must surely be responsible for the conflict. @gmer Can you adjust code to gmer to fascilitate cooperation with SDT (hookers)drivers of some other security programs? Gmer is only program that suffers this static and should be a simple matter to fix compatibility to say a klif.sys and safemon.sys. |
|
#73
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Please try to follow my first suggestion and I will prepare box similar to yours. Quote:
Last edited by gmer : February 24th, 2007 at 09:33 AM. |
|
#74
|
||||
|
||||
|
To all,
Let's keep our posts directed toward anti-rootkit programs and not individuals. As such certain posts were removed. Bubba |
|
#75
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I prefer and recommend Microsoft Rootkit Revealer when it comes to easiness. Then comes GMer . I mean separated anti-rootkit tools |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|