Wilders Security Forums  

Go Back   Wilders Security Forums > Security Products > other firewalls
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old August 17th, 2006, 05:38 AM
Antus's Avatar
Antus Antus is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 76
Default Are Firewalls Enough Protection

Time after Time this question has been raised. Are we completley safe with just a firewall? Review and quote below.

http://www.plynt.com/resources/learn...tion_firewall/
  #2  
Old August 17th, 2006, 06:22 AM
TOMxEU's Avatar
TOMxEU TOMxEU is online now
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 1,534
Default Re: Are Firewalls Enough Protection

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antus
Are we completelly safe with just a firewall?
Absolutelly (in my opinion). Even properly set up PC without a firewall is safe enough.
Of course, it is a huge difference, if it is a desktop, a server or a PC in network domain.
__________________
Real-Time: Nothing | On-Demand: Nothing [ Lenovo E525 | Yandex | CCleaner | KC SUMo | WiseCare 365 ] ( BlackViper / DEP / OpenDNS / UAC / WiFiRouter )
  #3  
Old August 17th, 2006, 06:32 AM
trickyricky trickyricky is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 475
Default Re: Are Firewalls Enough Protection

Yes, safe enough with just a firewall against the perils on the internet, but maybe not safe enough against the actual user of the PC...
  #4  
Old August 17th, 2006, 09:26 AM
sosaiso's Avatar
sosaiso sosaiso is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 601
Default Re: Are Firewalls Enough Protection

I've wondered about this myself.

I never use my antivirus... I do weekly scans with Ewido/SAS/antivirus, and nothing is ever found. [not even spyware cookies because I clean cache when I exit firefox.]

But, there is always that "when" and "if" we always get afraid of... So I guess, at least an antivirus SHOULD stay.
__________________
Windows Firewall, SandboxIE.
  #5  
Old August 17th, 2006, 10:38 AM
Alphalutra1's Avatar
Alphalutra1 Alphalutra1 is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 127.0.0.0/255.0.0.0
Posts: 1,160
Default Re: Are Firewalls Enough Protection

I am wondering about dropping my av and making it on-demand only as well. I have never had an av catch anything unwanted on my pc, whether it was nod, antivir, kav, etc. The only problem is that this pc is shared, but the other user has a limited user and only surfs banking sites really. Sandboxie coupled with SSM really makes me wonder whether or not an av is necessary. Also, using proxomitron for opera and ie and ablock with noscript really has my browsers locked down. I may make the switch soon .

Alphalutra1
__________________
Proud user of Gentoo, OpenBSD, dwm, (n)vi, heirloom-mailx, and pf
  #6  
Old August 17th, 2006, 11:02 AM
aigle's Avatar
aigle aigle is offline
Incredibly Massive Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Saudi Arabia/ Pakistan
Posts: 10,410
Default Re: Are Firewalls Enough Protection

I was also thinking like but in a bit different way, that is to drop Antivir and to just rely upon SSM free( GUI disconnected) and GesWall plus SnoopFree.
And I also think to make my system to Rollback to a clean snapshot on every boot with RollbackRx, while disabling windows updates( but to disable windows updates is the only thing I am not able to accept so far).
__________________

Ubuntu 12.10
AX64 Time Machine, Comodo FW & Defence Plus, Sandboxie not compatible?
  #7  
Old August 17th, 2006, 09:44 PM
HKLO
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Are Firewalls Enough Protection

An good antivirus and firewall is like home insurance. It takes ONE time for you to understand you need it when you get some malware. I like NOD32, Kaspersky,
Grisoft free for antivirus and Zone Alarm pro or Kaspersky firewall.

At the least every windows computer on the planet needs a free antivirus with free antispyware (lavasoft etc.) and zonealarm....seems to be the easiest to use for free firewalls. CA antivirus is good too and somewhat free (12 month trial).

Most windows vulnerabilites are exacerbated by the user. I am not apologizing for microsoft, they could write much better software...but some people....geeez!
  #8  
Old August 17th, 2006, 10:35 PM
herbalist
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Are Firewalls Enough Protection

Quote:
Are we completley safe with just a firewall?
There's no such thing as completely safe using Windows. I consider a firewall a necessity. Signature based security software is becoming less effective all the time. See the link on http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=143491, first post. I don't rely on a resident AV anymore. I can't remember the last time one detected something on my system that I didn't deliberately bring in for testing. That said, I still use AV scanners to check all incoming files, but don't consider the AV as part of my core security. Like several others in this thread, I rely on System Safety Monitor to protect me from unknown threats.
Control is the key to being as secure as possible with Windows.
1, Control of the traffic in and out of your PC, a firewall.
2, Control over what is allowed to run and what these processes are allowed to do, and block everything else, HIPS like System Safety Monitor.
3, Control over what content can be delivered by the traffic that is allowed, content filtering like Proxomitron provides.
4, And of course, the worst problem and hardest to fix, control over the users of the PC and the things they click on, open, download, etc.
Although an AV doesn't provide the protection it used to, I'd still recommend keeping one. If you have a good understanding of how your operating system works, are confident in your ability to configure other security software that doesn't depend on signatures like HIPS and a good firewall, and have a good system backup procedure in place, then you might consider not relying on a resident AV. That's a decision you have to make for yourself when you're ready.
Rick
  #9  
Old August 17th, 2006, 11:55 PM
The Hammer's Avatar
The Hammer The Hammer is offline
Massive Poster
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 5,089
Default Re: Are Firewalls Enough Protection

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antus
Time after Time this question has been raised. Are we completley safe with just a firewall? Review and quote below.

http://www.plynt.com/resources/learn...tion_firewall/
For me the short answer is no. To go with a firewall only is like playing Russian Roulette. You might get to spin the chamber of the revolver and pull the trigger a few times before you get shot.
  #10  
Old August 18th, 2006, 12:12 AM
mercurie's Avatar
mercurie mercurie is offline
A Friendly Creature
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sky over the Wilders Forest
Posts: 2,439
Default Re: Are Firewalls Enough Protection

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Hammer
For me the short answer is no. To go with a firewall only is like playing Russian Roulette. You might get to spin the chamber of the revolver and pull the trigger a few times before you get shot.
BANG! Splat! There goes another unprotected machine

The Hammer is right. I agree.
__________________
PC 1) Acer Aspire X1200, 4GB ram, Dual core AMD Athlon, 64x2 5000, 2.6 GHz, Vista Prem. Norton Internet Security on cable

PC 2) Emachine 1 GB ram, AMD Sempron, 2.1 GHz, XP, Avast Free on DSL.
 

Wilders Security Forums > Security Products > other firewalls « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, Wilders Security Forums