Wilders Security Forums  

Go Back   Wilders Security Forums > Archived Forums > Closed Sub-Forums > Archived ESET Support Forums > NOD32 version 2 Forum
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old October 7th, 2005, 12:38 PM
Albinoni's Avatar
Albinoni Albinoni is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 704
Default Anti Phising

I'm using NOD32 V2.50 or the latest version and would like to know if this version of NOD supports Anti Phising. I know quite alot of AV software out there today does, but not sure about this version of NOD.

Also basically how does it work.

I thought Anti Phising has got more to do with FW's than that of AV software.
  #2  
Old October 7th, 2005, 01:04 PM
fosius's Avatar
fosius fosius is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Partizanske, Slovakia
Posts: 479
Default Re: Anti Phising

NOD32 has ability to catch Phising mails... by generic and signatures detection..
__________________
Eset NOD32 Antivirus on Vista Business (UAC enabled)
  #3  
Old October 7th, 2005, 04:45 PM
alglove alglove is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Posts: 904
Default Re: Anti Phising

Basically, it scans the e-mail body looking for something that "looks" like phishing text. Unfortunately, I do not find that it works particularly well. I would say that roughly 95% of phishing e-mails make it through undetected into my Inbox. That is not an exaggeration. I must be on the cutting edge of phish.

I am submitting samples of these undetected phishing e-mails to Eset in hopes that they will improve the detection rate. Until they do, however, I cannot recommend NOD32 to protect you against phishing attacks.

So you know, I am a huge fan of NOD32. Just not for anti-phishing.
  #4  
Old October 8th, 2005, 09:18 AM
webyourbusiness's Avatar
webyourbusiness webyourbusiness is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Throughout the USA and Canada
Posts: 2,582
Default Re: Anti Phising

are you submitting your undetected phishing attempt algove? If you're not, how do you expect Eset to improve the algorithms?
  #5  
Old October 8th, 2005, 02:45 PM
YeOldeStonecat's Avatar
YeOldeStonecat YeOldeStonecat is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Along the Shorelines somewhere in New England
Posts: 2,343
Default Re: Anti Phising

On the clients that I have using Small Business Server utilitizing the XMON plugin....wow it's kept busy yanking an aweful lot of Phishing junk mail.

I do find it quite effective.

On a further note...any business clients people here have who are using Office 2003....Microsoft recently released a service pack (a week or two ago) which adds a Phishing filter to the built in junk mail filter, and with their normal nearly monthly junk mail filter updates from office.microsoft.com....it does a decent job.
__________________
Guinness for Strength!
  #6  
Old October 8th, 2005, 03:42 PM
alglove alglove is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Posts: 904
Default Re: Anti Phising

Quote:
Originally Posted by webyourbusiness
are you submitting your undetected phishing attempt algove? If you're not, how do you expect Eset to improve the algorithms?
Yes, I am. I am saving the e-mails as .eml files, and then submitting them through Quarantine --> Submit for Analysis. I also put "undetected phishing e-mail" in the comments field, so there is no question what it is.
  #7  
Old February 10th, 2006, 12:51 PM
andrator andrator is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 54
Default Re: Anti Phising

Quote:
Originally Posted by YeOldeStonecat
On the clients that I have using Small Business Server utilitizing the XMON plugin....wow it's kept busy yanking an aweful lot of Phishing junk mail.

I do find it quite effective.

Hi,

I've just finished configuring XMON and I'm browsing through XMON posts. I noticed that XMON by default doesn't scan plain text message bodies. This looks logical because it's difficult if not impossible to put a payload into plain text. IIRC there are many plain text phishing mails. If XMON does scan for phishing junk mail shouldn't I enable scanning plain text message bodies?
 

Wilders Security Forums > Archived Forums > Closed Sub-Forums > Archived ESET Support Forums > NOD32 version 2 Forum « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, Wilders Security Forums