Malwarebytes

[Ibrad]

I highly doubt all Malwarebytes detection is based on file name however I don't care if they detect some by filename. If its doing that good why care how its detecting the threats?

Also look at the MBAM Rock-Star research team. You got sUBS who has made combofix a tool used by many malware removers that I doubt its based on filename. Its highly impossible that the whole MBAM research team are rouge agents...

[The Hammer]

Are you hearing what's being said to you in spite of the tin hat Dave?

[kupo]

I'd rate this poster 2/10, I've seen better trolls.

[TonyW]

Originally Posted by Page42

Literally millions of people have this program installed, and if their machines were being infected by it, do you think that that fact would at this moment be widespread knowledge? I think it would be.

And the fallout would be disastrous PR for the company if this were the case.

[Frank the Perv]

Originally Posted by BoaterDave

Oops! I seem to have touched a nerve!

I never made a claim - what I said there was .....

What a super ruse it would be - to clear a machine of everyone else's 'nasties' but then, perhaps, leave their own package installed on the user's machine. No one would ever suspect, would they?

Cybercrime has risen exponentially since Malwarebytes was first founded in 2004. See: http://www.malwarebytes.org/about.php

It's probably just a coincidence, eh?!! ;-)

--
The Internet needs 'good guys'!

Your spurious posts about a good product are, uh, stupid.

Go look at test results and reviews for MBAM.




.

[DBone]

I feel like an idiot for falling for it. I thought I was helping someone, but I totally missed it.

[JRViejo]

Originally Posted by nosirrah

I think I will let wilders handle this thread going forward.

And we have. Thread is closed. Thank you all!