Wilders Security Forums  

Go Back   Wilders Security Forums > Official ESET Support Forum > ESET Home Users Products Forum > ESET NOD32 Antivirus
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old September 14th, 2012, 05:24 PM
Fidelius Fidelius is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 141
Default Is V 5 a memory eater ?

Hello,

I have just switched to version 5.2.9.12 of Nod32 Antivirus. EKRN32.EXE uses 102 MB of Ram while version 4 it used 87 MB. No application is running except the same background usual services
My OS is Windows xp pro X64.
  #2  
Old September 14th, 2012, 09:04 PM
berryracer's Avatar
berryracer berryracer is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dubai, UAE
Posts: 1,640
Default Re: Is V 5 a memory eater ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fidelius
Hello,

I have just switched to version 5.2.9.12 of Nod32 Antivirus. EKRN32.EXE uses 102 MB of Ram while version 4 it used 87 MB. No application is running except the same background usual services
My OS is Windows xp pro X64.

yeah and who cares about memory? what do you have less than 2 GB of RAM??

Nowadays I don't see a system with less than 4 GB RAM is very cheap

Plus, a few MBs more won't change anything

at the end of the day it's not how many MBs of RAM that the AV uses is which determines your system's performance, it's how the scanning engine handles on access scans for files which ESET excels in and remains the lightest AV in the world, even though v4 and v5 are much heavier than the older v2 version, still, when it comes to performance, they're the best. Just subpar scanning detection rate according to Virus testing labs

kthxbye
__________________
ASUS G75VW-T1086V
CPU: i7-3610QM 2.30/3.30 GHz.
Memory: 16 GB DDR3 1600 Mhz. RAM
Storage: 256GB SSD + 1TB HDD
Graphics: GeForce GTX 670M 3GB
Screen: 17.3' Full HD LED Screen
  #3  
Old September 14th, 2012, 09:42 PM
Fidelius Fidelius is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 141
Default Re: Is V 5 a memory eater ?

I care about the usage of memory. Nowadays, programmers no longer seem interested by *optimization*. It is the same reasoning which leads people to use crapware OS like Windows 7 and 8, "I have a lot of memory so it does not matter".
The AV tests suck and mean nothing.

I am not interested by your answer and the features of your computer so next time... u know what to do.
  #4  
Old September 14th, 2012, 09:49 PM
berryracer's Avatar
berryracer berryracer is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dubai, UAE
Posts: 1,640
Default Re: Is V 5 a memory eater ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fidelius
I care about the usage of memory. Nowadays, programmers no longer seem interested by *optimization*. It is the same reasoning which leads people to use crapware OS like Windows 7 and 8, "I have a lot of memory so it does not matter".
The AV tests suck and mean nothing.

I am not interested by your answer and the features of your computer so next time... u know what to do.

Want me to donate you $15 bucks to buy an additional 4 GB of RAM?
__________________
ASUS G75VW-T1086V
CPU: i7-3610QM 2.30/3.30 GHz.
Memory: 16 GB DDR3 1600 Mhz. RAM
Storage: 256GB SSD + 1TB HDD
Graphics: GeForce GTX 670M 3GB
Screen: 17.3' Full HD LED Screen
  #5  
Old September 15th, 2012, 03:06 AM
Marcos Marcos is offline
Eset Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,195
Default Re: Is V 5 a memory eater ?

Memory usage up to 120-150 MB by ekrn is relatively normal. On my home PC and v6, it's now consuming 98 MB, on my office computer with the latest Endpoint installed it's 59 MB. As files are being scanned, memory consumption can grow a bit. Enabling/disabling mail client integration also slightly affects memory consumption when you open the mail client.
If memory consumption had to be very same at all times, we couldn't: add new signatures, add new features, scan files, unpack files, etc.
  #6  
Old September 15th, 2012, 05:37 AM
King Grub's Avatar
King Grub King Grub is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 756
Default Re: Is V 5 a memory eater ?

The high RAM usage is one of the main reasons ESET runs so light on the system.
  #7  
Old September 15th, 2012, 02:57 PM
Fidelius Fidelius is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 141
Default Re: Is V 5 a memory eater ?

Thank you Marcos for answering my question. I shall take a closer look at the options I have chosen.
  #8  
Old September 15th, 2012, 04:14 PM
The Hammer's Avatar
The Hammer The Hammer is offline
Massive Poster
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 5,091
Default Re: Is V 5 a memory eater ?

Hey Fidelius. Check out the original post in this thread. Your arguing with a guy who was bashing Eset just yesterday, http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showt...39#post2114739
__________________
Desktop -Win 7 Home Premium 64 bit, NAT Router Firewall, Windows Firewall, Avira Antivirus Premium V13, MBAM PRO 1.75 , WOT, Win 7's System imaging. Netbook-Avira Antivirus Premium V13 , MBAM PRO 1.75, WOT.
  #9  
Old September 15th, 2012, 07:58 PM
BALTAGY BALTAGY is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 99
Default Re: Is V 5 a memory eater ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcos
Memory usage up to 120-150 MB by ekrn is relatively normal. On my home PC and v6, it's now consuming 98 MB, on my office computer with the latest Endpoint installed it's 59 MB. As files are being scanned, memory consumption can grow a bit. Enabling/disabling mail client integration also slightly affects memory consumption when you open the mail client.
If memory consumption had to be very same at all times, we couldn't: add new signatures, add new features, scan files, unpack files, etc.

did you leave your home computer on for day's? and you told me that memory leak in v5 will be fixed in next version!!

and what about v6 i reported for memory leak too and now in my post i talk to my self!!
  #10  
Old September 15th, 2012, 08:01 PM
BALTAGY BALTAGY is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 99
Default Re: Is V 5 a memory eater ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by berryracer
yeah and who cares about memory? what do you have less than 2 GB of RAM??

Nowadays I don't see a system with less than 4 GB RAM is very cheap

Plus, a few MBs more won't change anything

at the end of the day it's not how many MBs of RAM that the AV uses is which determines your system's performance, it's how the scanning engine handles on access scans for files which ESET excels in and remains the lightest AV in the world, even though v4 and v5 are much heavier than the older v2 version, still, when it comes to performance, they're the best. Just subpar scanning detection rate according to Virus testing labs

kthxbye

you have 16GB of ram so as you said who cares about memory, but what about people that have 1GB or less?! 1GB and 2GB not bad for some people that just need computer for simple jobs

btw i have 12GB and yes i care about memory
  #11  
Old September 16th, 2012, 09:55 PM
tuntun tuntun is offline
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 39
Default Re: Is V 5 a memory eater ?

My users only got 2GB with WinXP with Dual core PCs. Who is going to pay and upgrade on this PC for additional RAM?
 

Wilders Security Forums > Official ESET Support Forum > ESET Home Users Products Forum > ESET NOD32 Antivirus « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, Wilders Security Forums