![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hello,
I have just switched to version 5.2.9.12 of Nod32 Antivirus. EKRN32.EXE uses 102 MB of Ram while version 4 it used 87 MB. No application is running except the same background usual services My OS is Windows xp pro X64. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
yeah and who cares about memory? what do you have less than 2 GB of RAM??Nowadays I don't see a system with less than 4 GB RAM is very cheap Plus, a few MBs more won't change anything at the end of the day it's not how many MBs of RAM that the AV uses is which determines your system's performance, it's how the scanning engine handles on access scans for files which ESET excels in and remains the lightest AV in the world, even though v4 and v5 are much heavier than the older v2 version, still, when it comes to performance, they're the best. Just subpar scanning detection rate according to Virus testing labs kthxbye
__________________
ASUS G75VW-T1086V CPU: i7-3610QM 2.30/3.30 GHz. Memory: 16 GB DDR3 1600 Mhz. RAM Storage: 256GB SSD + 1TB HDD Graphics: GeForce GTX 670M 3GB Screen: 17.3' Full HD LED Screen |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I care about the usage of memory. Nowadays, programmers no longer seem interested by *optimization*. It is the same reasoning which leads people to use crapware OS like Windows 7 and 8, "I have a lot of memory so it does not matter".
The AV tests suck and mean nothing. I am not interested by your answer and the features of your computer so next time... u know what to do. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Want me to donate you $15 bucks to buy an additional 4 GB of RAM? ![]()
__________________
ASUS G75VW-T1086V CPU: i7-3610QM 2.30/3.30 GHz. Memory: 16 GB DDR3 1600 Mhz. RAM Storage: 256GB SSD + 1TB HDD Graphics: GeForce GTX 670M 3GB Screen: 17.3' Full HD LED Screen |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Memory usage up to 120-150 MB by ekrn is relatively normal. On my home PC and v6, it's now consuming 98 MB, on my office computer with the latest Endpoint installed it's 59 MB. As files are being scanned, memory consumption can grow a bit. Enabling/disabling mail client integration also slightly affects memory consumption when you open the mail client.
If memory consumption had to be very same at all times, we couldn't: add new signatures, add new features, scan files, unpack files, etc. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
The high RAM usage is one of the main reasons ESET runs so light on the system.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you Marcos for answering my question. I shall take a closer look at the options I have chosen.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hey Fidelius. Check out the original post in this thread. Your arguing with a guy who was bashing Eset just yesterday, http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showt...39#post2114739
__________________
Desktop -Win 7 Home Premium 64 bit, NAT Router Firewall, Windows Firewall, Avira Antivirus Premium V13, MBAM PRO 1.75 , WOT, Win 7's System imaging. Netbook-Avira Antivirus Premium V13 , MBAM PRO 1.75, WOT. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
did you leave your home computer on for day's? and you told me that memory leak in v5 will be fixed in next version!! and what about v6 i reported for memory leak too and now in my post i talk to my self!! ![]() |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
you have 16GB of ram so as you said who cares about memory, but what about people that have 1GB or less?! 1GB and 2GB not bad for some people that just need computer for simple jobs btw i have 12GB and yes i care about memory |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
My users only got 2GB with WinXP with Dual core PCs. Who is going to pay and upgrade on this PC for additional RAM?
|
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|