Wilders Security Forums  

Go Back   Wilders Security Forums > Official Paragon Support Forum > Paragon File System Drivers > NTFS for Mac & ExtFS for Mac
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old February 10th, 2011, 12:11 PM
sinoue sinoue is offline
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 5
Question NEWBEE - Ok to run Mac pro with both NTFS for Mac and MacFuse?

Can someone explain if I need both Paragon NTFS for Mac and Google MacFuse? I am migrating from an Alienware to my first Mac Pro (10.6.6). I downloaded the NTFS for Mac to help manage bootcamp and it worked great. I then installed VMware Fusion 3 and it installed MacFuse.

Am I duplicating functionality with both installed in my system preferences? Does OS X have any problems with both being installed? Which one gets used? Can I remove MacFuse without affecting VMware Fusion?

Sorry for all the questions but any insight would be appreciated.

In trying to research and answer I couldn't find much. I did find this cool benchmark saying Paragon was faster than NTFS-3G or Tuxera. http://www.codykonior.com/tuxera-ntf...ac-benchmarks/

Stephen
  #2  
Old February 10th, 2011, 12:50 PM
1chaoticadult's Avatar
1chaoticadult 1chaoticadult is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chaotic Land
Posts: 2,219
Default Re: NEWBEE - Ok to run Mac pro with both NTFS for Mac and MacFuse?

I think a good question why would you need both? Both are Virtual Machines that allow you to run Windows on Mac. I would chose one and be done with it.
__________________
Built-in OS Security + EMET + HitmanPro

Last edited by 1chaoticadult : February 10th, 2011 at 03:21 PM.
  #3  
Old February 10th, 2011, 02:47 PM
aigle's Avatar
aigle aigle is offline
Incredibly Massive Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Saudi Arabia/ Pakistan
Posts: 10,416
Default Re: NEWBEE - Ok to run Mac pro with both NTFS for Mac and MacFuse?

These are not emulators.
__________________

Ubuntu 12.10
AX64 Time Machine, Comodo FW & Defence Plus, Sandboxie not compatible?
  #4  
Old February 10th, 2011, 03:20 PM
1chaoticadult's Avatar
1chaoticadult 1chaoticadult is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chaotic Land
Posts: 2,219
Default Re: NEWBEE - Ok to run Mac pro with both NTFS for Mac and MacFuse?

Quote:
Originally Posted by aigle
These are not emulators.

Ok then I used the wrong word big deal. You failed to even contribute to this thread so whats the point of your posting if only to correct my wording.
__________________
Built-in OS Security + EMET + HitmanPro
  #5  
Old February 11th, 2011, 03:46 AM
Mech_An's Avatar
Mech_An Mech_An is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 814
Default Re: NEWBEE - Ok to run Mac pro with both NTFS for Mac and MacFuse?

Unlike MacFuse Paragon NTFS for Mac is full file system driver, which works in kernel space.

MacFuse has similar functionality, so Paragon NTFS for Mac will replace it. There should be no compatibility issues.
__________________
Mechanical animal
  #6  
Old February 11th, 2011, 05:56 PM
sinoue sinoue is offline
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 5
Default Re: NEWBEE - Ok to run Mac pro with both NTFS for Mac and MacFuse?

Cool. Thanks for the info on why Paragon is better. I just finished several hours of copying old photos & music off my PC drives using NTFS for Mac without a hitch.

I'm now looking at HFS+ system drivers for Windows 7 64 bit bootcamp (since most of my new drives are now formatted Mac).

thanks,

Stephen
  #7  
Old February 14th, 2011, 03:53 AM
aigle's Avatar
aigle aigle is offline
Incredibly Massive Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Saudi Arabia/ Pakistan
Posts: 10,416
Default Re: NEWBEE - Ok to run Mac pro with both NTFS for Mac and MacFuse?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1chaoticadult
Ok then I used the wrong word big deal. You failed to even contribute to this thread so whats the point of your posting if only to correct my wording.
Not onlty wrong words my dear, you got it totally wrong.

Both are neither emulators nor VMs. NTFS for Mac is a software that allow you to read n write access to NTFS file system from within native native HFS+ file system of Mac. I don,t know much about Macfuse but it has similar feature to NTFS for Mac.

Don,t take me wrong, I just corrected your info and the info given to OP. More than that I can,t contribute as I never used even a Mac so how can I help the OP!
__________________

Ubuntu 12.10
AX64 Time Machine, Comodo FW & Defence Plus, Sandboxie not compatible?
  #8  
Old February 14th, 2011, 06:55 AM
Mech_An's Avatar
Mech_An Mech_An is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 814
Default Re: NEWBEE - Ok to run Mac pro with both NTFS for Mac and MacFuse?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sinoue
I'm now looking at HFS+ system drivers for Windows 7 64 bit bootcamp (since most of my new drives are now formatted Mac).
Did you see paragon HFS+ for Windows? http://www.paragon-software.com/home/hfs-windows/
NTFS for Mac should include read-only HFS driver for Windows as a component. Did you check if it exists in My Account - My Downloads?
__________________
Mechanical animal
 

Wilders Security Forums > Official Paragon Support Forum > Paragon File System Drivers > NTFS for Mac & ExtFS for Mac « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, Wilders Security Forums