Wilders Security Forums  

Go Back   Wilders Security Forums > Privacy Related Topics > privacy general
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 02:23 PM
lotuseclat79 lotuseclat79 is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,911
Default 'Cyborg' allegedly attacked over camera implants

'Cyborg' allegedly attacked over camera implants (2 web pages).

Quote:
"Parts of me started shutting down," says professor and self-proclaimed cyborg after an alleged assault at a McDonald's in Paris.
...
No matter how this ends, Mann's story raises serious questions about technology and privacy.

-- Tom
  #2  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 02:30 PM
RJK3 RJK3 is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 469
Default Re: 'Cyborg' allegedly attacked over camera implants

You can see some supporting evidence he posted on this blog:
http://eyetap.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07...nalds-for.html

Seems strange that no one would help with an assault. Surely a lawyer would help with the evidence he has.
  #3  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 04:07 PM
noone_particular noone_particular is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,876
Default Re: 'Cyborg' allegedly attacked over camera implants

The camera issue is going to be a big can of worms. Arguments saying that it's no different than memory don't hold up. You can't share or send copies of memories. You can't enhance and dissect mental pictures. IMO, wearable technology leads to a world we really don't need and would be better off without.
__________________
Sitting in a bunker, here behind my wall, waiting for the worms to come.
  #4  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 04:25 PM
RJK3 RJK3 is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 469
Default Re: 'Cyborg' allegedly attacked over camera implants

Quote:
Originally Posted by noone_particular
The camera issue is going to be a big can of worms. Arguments saying that it's no different than memory don't hold up. You can't share or send copies of memories. You can't enhance and dissect mental pictures. IMO, wearable technology leads to a world we really don't need and would be better off without.

I generally agree, although that is because I know little about the 'medical' reasons hinted at in the articles which suggest the technology is required by some.

Still no justification for assault and damage to property though; hope he finds justice.
  #5  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 04:38 PM
noone_particular noone_particular is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,876
Default Re: 'Cyborg' allegedly attacked over camera implants

No, it's not justification for assault. I'd be interested to know more about this "medical condition" as well. Unfortunately, when the equipment makes someone look like a walking piece of spyware, undesired reactions are going to happen. If someone turned up at my door wearing that gear, I'd confront them as well. It's a lot like using a hearing aid for eavesdropping. Easy to do but hard to prove.

The direction technology is going, especially in regards to wearable computing makes me glad I'm not young. I really don't want to see the world this leads to.
__________________
Sitting in a bunker, here behind my wall, waiting for the worms to come.
  #6  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 05:28 PM
Nebulus's Avatar
Nebulus Nebulus is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 796
Default Re: 'Cyborg' allegedly attacked over camera implants

Quote:
Originally Posted by noone_particular
The direction technology is going, especially in regards to wearable computing makes me glad I'm not young. I really don't want to see the world this leads to.

Well, unless you are 70 or 80, you might be out of luck, considering the speed of the changes - you might still live enough to see it
  #7  
Old July 22nd, 2012, 06:03 PM
mirimir mirimir is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,524
Default Re: 'Cyborg' allegedly attacked over camera implants

Quote:
Originally Posted by noone_particular
No, it's not justification for assault. I'd be interested to know more about this "medical condition" as well.
From what I've read, his only "medical condition" is having the hardware screwed into his skull. He was in the news a few years ago, when some of the attachments became infected.

Quote:
Originally Posted by noone_particular
Unfortunately, when the equipment makes someone look like a walking piece of spyware, undesired reactions are going to happen. If someone turned up at my door wearing that gear, I'd confront them as well.
Cellphones are just as dangerous, I think.

Quote:
Originally Posted by noone_particular
It's a lot like using a hearing aid for eavesdropping. Easy to do but hard to prove.
As the technology matures, it will become less obtrusive, and easier to hide. That's certainly happened with hearing aids, over the last few decades.

Consider quadriplegics who are deaf and blind, and who have exoskeletons and sensory implants. Should it be legal to discriminate against them? How about old people with similar hardware?
 

Wilders Security Forums > Privacy Related Topics > privacy general « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, Wilders Security Forums