![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Almost every FW and AV Program has it on board: Web-Shields
Only one should be active, but which one is best? The Web-Shield that comes with Online Armor or the one that comes with NOD32 AV? I am not really convinced of its use and have both turned off. With NOD32 AV, I only have the HTTP/POP3-Ports checked. Any hints? -- Frank |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Personally would run them both, 1 is a webshield and the other a webscanner so they arent exactely the same things but have the same goals - stop the bogie from hitting your disc
__________________
Vista 64 |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm running both products but tend to have Web Shield on OA turned off. Not because of NOD32 but because of my FF add-ons etc (NoScript, Java turned off), Spywareblaster and A-squared surf protection which all block a lot from happening.
Whenever I've switched OA Web Shield on there is a noticeable slowdown on loading pages, another reason for the decision. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I take it you reported the slowdown on their forum?
__________________
Vista 64 |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nope. I've noticed the slowdown with a few similar programs and sort of expect it. If I felt like I needed the WebShield I may have persevered more though ......
|
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|