![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Over the years I've been in a habit of doing a complete system scan right after a day's work, usually at midnight. Wouldn't it be nice if version 3 has a handy feature incorporated that allows user to schedule computer shutdown upon scan completion? This way I don't have to stay up through the annoying hours till it wraps up. I know it's easy to realize this so I'm assuming that it doesn't hurt to get it done?
I would appreciation your thoughts and opinions. Thank you. ![]() |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Change your habit With real-time protection enabled , why it is necessary to perform full scan every 24 hours. Once or twice in a month is enough - you can also choose full scheduled scan to run in the background without you noticing it at all. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just so you know, a great number of people are expecting this feature on the local security forum. So I'm not speaking for myself, but also pleading on their behalf.
![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree with HiTech_Boy but we all have different habits.
My only query with this would be what if after the scan it required user intervention on something that had been found? Would it just shutdown regardless or sit a wait for someone to click something? Or I suppose it would automatically clean any infections found. FYI I run a full scan once a month but other than that I'm happy to rely realtime protection to "protect" me. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If cleaning level is set to (2) the highest , then ESS will automatically clean/delete threats BUT no matter the level , if Probably unknown heur_PE virus is found the current ESS will always prompt the user for action . This is made to prevent deletion of a non-malware files (in case of false positive, even though it extremely rare with Eset products) |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
It can be as simple as a small box underneath the manual scan window which says 'shut down computer when scan is finished' and which user can choose to check or uncheck. Please, ESET team, give it a thought.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Yeah that would work. Suppose there's no harm to include it then it's up to you whether you use it or not. No harm in that. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think that's necessary too
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
* Windows XP has such a utility built in [shutdown.exe], but it fails to make some systems power off. There are better third-party alternatives if this is the case for you.
__________________
They say the only totally secure PC is one that is turned off. So, I showed my PC a photo of my wife! [ba-dum-bum-tsss] |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Running full scan in the background would be a pain in the neck especially when one's doing some heavy duty tasks. Keep in mind not everyone has a high-end computer. Most of people don't. Comments from ESET team would be greatly appreciated. And thanks for being supportive, Ade 1. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
They say the only totally secure PC is one that is turned off. So, I showed my PC a photo of my wife! [ba-dum-bum-tsss] Last edited by nameless : July 13th, 2007 at 12:52 AM. |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
I happen to be moderating a local NOD32 fanboy forum in China where we have 17,000+ members and out of the most active members, approx. 1/3 of them, are repeatedly requesting this feature. I wasn't exactly exaggerating. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Honestly, though, I use batch files (run by Task Scheduler) with NOD32 2.7 to run scans anyway. The advantage is that you can see the scanner window, whereas the NOD32 scheduler hides it. (My preference is to see what's going on, especially when something very CPU/IO intensive like a scan is going on.) Hopefully they at least provide the option to show the scanner window with 3.x. The batch file could be as simple as: Code:
__________________
They say the only totally secure PC is one that is turned off. So, I showed my PC a photo of my wife! [ba-dum-bum-tsss] |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
That certainly helps as a temporary solution. But the thing is, I'm not asking ESET to have this handy feature incorporated in next update, I'm asking to have it added in next generation of NOD32 antivirus system, NOD v3 and/or ESS. Given the months ahead for on-going development, we're in pretty good shape to have this nice little feature sorted out that means a lot to many of us. Please, ESET!
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
what a good idea.
but somehow if eset think their product can blocks the viruses , while some user still infected virus and don't need a full system scan? |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree, it would make a good feature to allow users to decide whether they want the computer to shut down (or not) after a scan completes.
Others DO have it, I know from experience, and just like most DVD/CD burn programs like Roxio and Nero, offer to shut off the computer after the burn/project is completed. It's not a difficult task at all, just as "nameless" uses in his Batch file solution, most of these other programs that have this feature use the MS shutdown.exe to execute this task for them. A simple call to execute "shutdown.exe" on scan completion is simple to code into the GUI. In fact it MAY be an option that just hasn't been enabled into the beta builds yet, but is in the plan for a final release, so until we see what the final looks like, I guess we shouldn't Assume that it won't be a part of ESS just yet. |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|