![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have been running some firewall and browser tests which have given me good results apart from the 'referrer'
I am told to block this via my firewall but I do not know how to? I know IE6 (Avant) is not a safe browser but I am still using it I would be grateful if anyone could advise as to what I need to do to prevent the failing the referrer test I am running the trial of Outpost Pro and have my browser configured for safety (I do not even store the history) plus I have MRU Blaster plus other security guards but just cannot work out which setting to use in the firewall to pass this test. Thanks in advance for any advice. Quote:
![]()
__________________
Vista-XP forum - xpforum - Windows XP - Vista - HijackThis support Last edited by Robyn : July 24th, 2004 at 10:05 AM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi Robyn ,
Looks like you are running the PC Flank test .. In Outpost Pro you can block referrers in the Active Content Plugin.. Right click on the icon in Outpost , go to properties / web pages and there you wil see the control for enabling / disabling referrers. Some websites will not work properly with this disabled however and outpost does not allow you to specify individual sites , so its either on or off. Heres some Outpost forum links on referrer blocking that should help you as well : http://outpostfirewall.com/forum/showthread.php?t=9541 http://outpostfirewall.com/forum/showthread.php?t=8995 I always leave it enabled myself , there are other programs to use which offer better referrer control , such as Proxomitron , Webwasher , Ad-muncher and a few others. I dont see it as such a major privacy risk compared to leaving behind my IP address at every website , but if you only visit sites you trust theres less to worry about. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Thank you I have found other settings now which I can modify if I need to I now know where to look as I really only have started to explore this firewall but so far I am very pleased. I will read the other links you have posted as I really want to learn a lot more about this firewall.PCFlank was the place of interest for their tests I have also been to SOS and GRC I hope after the trial I will know all the right clicks in the GUI of Outpost Thanks again - I was worried about refferer but as you say some sites may not work. A new learning curve but I think it will be worth it when I am more familiar with the configurations. After all my questions and headaches about choosing a new firewall I think I got some great advice!
__________________
Vista-XP forum - xpforum - Windows XP - Vista - HijackThis support |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Blocking referrers will have some side-effects depending on when it is blocked.
How does outpost do it? Does it always block referrer? Or only in certain cases? |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Outpost will, if referrers are blocked, replace them with "Field Blocked by Outpost (www.agnitum.com)". Some people view this as advertising and do not like it, others point out that it is not RFC-compliant and can cause problems on some websites.
The current version of Outpost (2.1) will only allow referrers to be set globally so using other software (like Proxomitron) to handle them may be a better option. The next version (2.5, currently in beta) does allow referrers to be set on a per-site basis (don't ask me when it will be released though, I'd guess in a month or so). |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
You mean it always block referrers, all the time?
Even if I move from say www.wildersecurity.com/page1.html to www.wildersecurity.com/page2.html? That's stupid. There is no need to do that at all. Moving from google.com to wilders is a different thing. And yes, now that you mention it, I do remember the irriating tag line in my referrer logs of my website. The irony is it allows you to be even more easily tracked, espically on sites where very few people use outpost. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Firefox does that.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Regards, CrazyM
__________________
"The best thing we can do in cyberspace is exactly what we do in the real world: do our best to manage the risks." - Bruce Schneier |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Setting network.http.sendRefererHeader to 0 is a all or nothing thing yes. But there is a patch for firefox that extends it's abilities further. +#define REFERRER_NONE 0 /* Never send the referrer */ +#define REFERRER_USER_ACTION 1 /* Actions directly initiated by the user (e.g. clicking on a link) */ +#define REFERRER_INLINE_CONTENT 2 /* Images or other inline content */ +#define REFERRER_NON_HTTP 3 /* NOT USED - remains for backwards compatability */ +#define REFERRER_SAME_HOST_ONLY 4 /* Send the referrer only for requests from the same host, otherwise send no referrer. */ +#define REFERRER_3RDPARTY_PREPATH 5 /* Send the referrer only for requests from the same host, otherwise send target URI's pre-path as the referrer. */ +#define REFERRER_3RDPARTY_NO_PREPATH 6 /* Strip off the path from the referrer for 3rd party requests, otherwise leave it alone. */ +#define REFERRER_PREPATH_URI_ALWAYS 7 /* Always send the target URI's pre-path as the referrer. */ http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55477 - I actually found this off a old post on this forum. It's not a per site thing (though come to think of it, some of the extensions which allow you to block referrers per tab might be extended to that), but it I think the various options captures the main reasons why you want to block referrers and provides some optional workarounds (okay forges the referrer) for some problems you might face with blocking referrers. Option 7 is similar (but not exactly) to that of the default proxomitron settings I believe. Of course, this doesn't help if you don't know how to compile your own firefox versions ,but I found the following build with as the bug patched in http://www.pryan.org/mozilla/firefox/amano/ . Not that I expect someone with your handle to trust something like that ![]() Does outpost or anything similar do this for IE? |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
)Quote:
The referer hack is interesting info and would be useful for most sites - however there are a few which are coded in a way that they need full referer details (Ebay.co.uk springs to mind here) so a per-site setting is need for these delinquents.Quote:
). It looks at HTTP headers and should, like Proxomitron, work with any browser. |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|