AppGuard 3.x 32/64 Bit

[Barb_C]

Originally Posted by molhopicante

You are right.

ERP now works OK.



EDIT:
I'm just editing to say that ERP only works when AppGuard is installed.

I'm testing both, and now I uninstalled AppGuard and the problem with ERP+IE+Outlook came back.

Strange...

AppGuard is magic!!!!

[Antarctica]

Originally Posted by Barb_C

AppGuard is magic!!!!

Yeah, for sure it is!

[BoerenkoolMetWorst]

I would like an option to set Signed to Deny instead of Guarded on High protection level.

[molhopicante]

Originally Posted by Barb_C

AppGuard is magic!!!!

So far I'm loving it.

It is almost certain that I will buy a license.

I just need to do some more tests with software and games that I have here.

[shadek]

Originally Posted by BoerenkoolMetWorst

I would like an option to set Signed to Deny instead of Guarded on High protection level.

Yes, it would be nice with a "custom" setting with complete granularity. Isn't it in the works though? I recall a post here saying it might get introduced.

[Barb_C]

Originally Posted by shadek

Yes, it would be nice with a "custom" setting with complete granularity. Isn't it in the works though? I recall a post here saying it might get introduced.

Sorry. That isn't planned for the current release. I will add to the wish list for the next release.

[Barb_C]

Originally Posted by BoerenkoolMetWorst

I would like an option to set Signed to Deny instead of Guarded on High protection level.

I will add to the wish list for the next release. It won't be able to make it into the next release as 3.5 is imminent.

[Cutting_Edgetech]

I hope to see some cosmetic work done to the GUI soon. Some of the boxes are too small, and one cannot read what written in some of the boxes. For example: much of the text in field 1, and field 2 is cut off inside of the ignored messages box. Also the box for exceptions in memory guard is a little too small for one to see the exceptions they have without scrolling down the list. I believe this would look better if the box was larger vertically. I wouldn't call these priority, but it makes for a more professional looking application. I would like to see password protection for AG.

Several other ideals have already been stated some time ago that I would consider priority. I would have to go back through the thread to find them. I don't have time to do it just this moment, but I hope BRN has been working on those.

[MRF71]

Can someone tell me if I should be concerned with any of these alerts?


06/13/13 01:09:04 Prevented process <ntshrui.dll - C:\WINDOWS\system32\rundll32.exe> from launching from <c:\documents and settings\angel\desktop>.

06/13/13 01:11:51 Prevented process <npskypechromeplugin.dll - C:\WINDOWS\system32\rundll32.exe> from launching from <c:\documents and settings\angel\local settings\application data\google\chrome\user data\default\extensions\lifbcibllhkdhoafpjfnlhfpfgnpldfl\6.9.0.12585_0>.

06/15/13 04:57:23 Prevented process <Google Chrome> from writing to <c:\windows\windowsupdate.log>.


06/15/13 05:06:00 Prevented <CleanMem By PcWinTech.com> from writing to memory of <Google Chrome>.

06/15/13 05:06:00 Prevented <CleanMem By PcWinTech.com> from reading memory of <Google Chrome>.

06/17/13 08:46:49 Prevented <Google Chrome> from reading memory of <Google Chrome>.

06/17/13 08:47:19 Prevented <Internet Explorer> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:47:23 Prevented <Internet Explorer> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:47:49 Prevented <Internet Explorer> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:48:00 Prevented <Internet Explorer> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:48:04 Prevented <Ad Muncher> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:48:09 Prevented <Internet Explorer> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:48:12 Prevented <Internet Explorer> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:48:15 Prevented <Internet Explorer> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:48:25 Prevented <Internet Explorer> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:48:34 Prevented <Internet Explorer> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:48:34 Prevented <AppGuard GUI Application> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:48:34 Prevented <Internet Explorer> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:48:51 Prevented <Internet Explorer> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:48:51 Prevented <CleanMem Mini Monitor> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:48:53 Prevented <Internet Explorer> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:48:55 Prevented <Internet Explorer> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:48:55 Prevented <AppGuard GUI Application> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:48:55 Prevented <HostsMan> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:48:55 Prevented <CleanMem Mini Monitor> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:49:16 Prevented <Internet Explorer> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:49:33 Prevented <Internet Explorer> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:49:35 Prevented <Internet Explorer> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:49:52 Prevented <Internet Explorer> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:49:57 Prevented <Internet Explorer> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

06/17/13 08:50:22 Prevented <AppGuard GUI Application> from reading memory of <CTF Loader>.

[pegr]

Originally Posted by MRF71

Can someone tell me if I should be concerned with any of these alerts?

So long as everything is working normally, all of these can all be safely ignored but you might want to consider a read/write MemoryGuard exception for CleanMem, which does need write access to the memory of running applications to do its job of freeing up memory.

[Barb_C]

Originally Posted by Cutting_Edgetech

I hope to see some cosmetic work done to the GUI soon. Some of the boxes are too small, and one cannot read what written in some of the boxes. For example: much of the text in field 1, and field 2 is cut off inside of the ignored messages box. Also the box for exceptions in memory guard is a little too small for one to see the exceptions they have without scrolling down the list. I believe this would look better if the box was larger vertically. I wouldn't call these priority, but it makes for a more professional looking application. I would like to see password protection for AG.

Several other ideals have already been stated some time ago that I would consider priority. I would have to go back through the thread to find them. I don't have time to do it just this moment, but I hope BRN has been working on those.

Some cosmetic work has been done on the GUI (the customization GUI is larger). I will be posting the other changes soon.

As far as password protection, I beleive that can be accomplished with the Parental Controls. Just set up an AppGuard super user and then on the Parental Controls page, uncheck all the boxes. Nothing will be able to be changed in the AppGuard policy (even the level) without entering the Super user's Windows logon credential and entering Priviledged Mode. Although this won't work if you're logged into Windows with the SuperUser account, but if you set up an account specifically to be the AppGuard super user all other logins would require the SuperUser's credential to make any changes.

[Peter2150]

Originally Posted by Barb_C

Some cosmetic work has been done on the GUI (the customization GUI is larger). I will be posting the other changes soon.

As far as password protection, I beleive that can be accomplished with the Parental Controls. Just set up an AppGuard super user and then on the Parental Controls page, uncheck all the boxes. Nothing will be able to be changed in the AppGuard policy (even the level) without entering the Super user's Windows logon credential and entering Priviledged Mode.

Hi Barb

I've looked at that and you are right, but it's kind of like scratching your left ear with your right hand. What is needed is a simple straight forward option on the password thing.

Pete

[MRF71]

Originally Posted by pegr

So long as everything is working normally, all of these can all be safely ignored but you might want to consider a read/write MemoryGuard exception for CleanMem, which does need write access to the memory of running applications to do its job of freeing up memory.

As far as I can tell everything is working normally, I'll make that change to cleanmem, thanks

[Cutting_Edgetech]

Originally Posted by Barb_C

Some cosmetic work has been done on the GUI (the customization GUI is larger). I will be posting the other changes soon.

As far as password protection, I beleive that can be accomplished with the Parental Controls. Just set up an AppGuard super user and then on the Parental Controls page, uncheck all the boxes. Nothing will be able to be changed in the AppGuard policy (even the level) without entering the Super user's Windows logon credential and entering Priviledged Mode. Although this won't work if you're logged into Windows with the SuperUser account, but if you set up an account specifically to be the AppGuard super user all other logins would require the SuperUser's credential to make any changes.

It good to hear they are working to improve the GUI now.