![]() |
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You say that you save your downloads in another drive. Can you check the following setting in your IDM? Options > Save To >Temporary Directory The above should be set to another drive too! The above will survive any numbers of reboots and you will be able to resume, if resume is available for that download. Best regards,
__________________
aladdin™ Samsung Galaxy Note II, Samsung Galaxy S3, Google Nexus 10 and Google Nexus 7 |
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I have tried Toolwiz TimeFreeze previously. It slows down the system too much. Things are 3 times slows at least compared to normal system. That's why I haven't compared it in my previous post. BTW, thanks for updated info ![]()
__________________
Windows 8 Pro x64 + Kaspersky Internet Security 2013 + Shadow Defender 1.2.0.376 + Sandboxie 3.76 Last edited by Boyfriend : August 19th, 2012 at 12:22 PM. |
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Temporary directory is also set to another drive, but download list can't survive frozen restart as IDM save download list in registry. I have to export that registry before each restart and then import it at next restart. Sometimes, it is feasible and sometimes it cause another problem; I have to change queue too of all downloads to resume after registry import.
__________________
Windows 8 Pro x64 + Kaspersky Internet Security 2013 + Shadow Defender 1.2.0.376 + Sandboxie 3.76 |
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Best regards,
__________________
aladdin™ Samsung Galaxy Note II, Samsung Galaxy S3, Google Nexus 10 and Google Nexus 7 |
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
|
You can set the memory buffer size in WTF if you have sufficient RAM available as stated in this extract from the WTF website:
"Time Freeze can suggest a memory buffer size as a default value, according to your system configuration. Select Use Physical Memory Buffer Mode, and you can customize the value from the Size list. If your physical memory does not meet the requirements, this option is not available". http://support.wondershare.com/how-t...mode-have.html |
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
|
It seems WTF and the other virtual system applications mentioned are best applied to the task of testing new programs in a secure environment, as opposed to internet security. What is the drawback of using them in internet security?
|
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Windows Firewall - avast! Free Antivirus - AppGuard - Shadow Defender - Sandboxie - Acronis True Image |
|
#58
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
After the reboot I am potentially safe to do my banking without worrying about any risks. After I am finished with my banking I will do another reboot. Then I can go any potential risky sites and get infected to my heart content and another reboot will take care of it. For this reason I always turn off my computer when I am finished with it rather than putting it to sleep. A reboot for me is 30 second job with SSD, btw SSDs are $80 for 120GB. A SSD is a must rather than paying dearly every year for a ridiculous layered solution. Best regards,
__________________
aladdin™ Samsung Galaxy Note II, Samsung Galaxy S3, Google Nexus 10 and Google Nexus 7 Last edited by aladdin : September 6th, 2012 at 03:47 AM. |
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I do the same thing and I'm glad you mentioned that because what you are recommending is good practice for increased security when banking or shopping online. However, that doesn't address the fundamental point I was making. With only a light virtualization program for protection, it's possible for malware to install itself in the virtual environment prior to reboot. Once running, unless additional security is in place, there is nothing to stop it from stealing data, passwords, etc. I repeat what I said before, light virtualization programs should not be used as the sole means of protection if the system is holding resources that need to be protected. Kind regards
__________________
Windows Firewall - avast! Free Antivirus - AppGuard - Shadow Defender - Sandboxie - Acronis True Image |
|
#60
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Can you give a scenario how malware will steal data under virtualization if the data is not used or the program which access the data is not used. Best regards,
__________________
aladdin™ Samsung Galaxy Note II, Samsung Galaxy S3, Google Nexus 10 and Google Nexus 7 |
|
#61
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Nice demonstration video showing how it can be done from ESET: http://blog.eset.com/2012/05/23/malw...ur-privacy-too Admittedly, the infection would only last until the next reboot, but I wouldn't want to run the risk of a RAT running on my system, even for a short time. Kind regards
__________________
Windows Firewall - avast! Free Antivirus - AppGuard - Shadow Defender - Sandboxie - Acronis True Image |
|
#62
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Close my password manager and reboot. Best regards, P.S. Good marketing video by ESET.
__________________
aladdin™ Samsung Galaxy Note II, Samsung Galaxy S3, Google Nexus 10 and Google Nexus 7 |
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
We're not talking about online banking and shopping here; that's not where you are going to get infected. We are talking about normal use of the browser, opening email attachments, plugging in USB sticks, etc. Virtualization software on its own won't protect data against a malware RAT if encountered by any of these means. And yes, you can guard against all of these things, but not by using virtualization software on its own, which is the point I'm making. Kind regards
__________________
Windows Firewall - avast! Free Antivirus - AppGuard - Shadow Defender - Sandboxie - Acronis True Image |
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
|
Q1) Does Deep Freeze clone the real OS partition into a virtual one using space on a HDD or in available RAM?
Q2) Is this the same for WTF? Q3) What if my real Windows was set up with the Documents folder mapped to another drive. Would the virtual session try to save files to the mapped location which is not virtual, or would another virtual volume be created that holds my Document folder? |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|