|
|
#2
January 27th, 2003, 08:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Re:panda antivirus
In my opinion, you would gain nothing and loose a lot. Panda's detection rate leaves something to be desired.
To me, one of the last considerations is whether a program has a small footprint or not. When other considerations are equal, then that may make a difference. Stick with NOD32. It has a small footprint and an excellent virus detection score.
__________________
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man (and a woman) in everlasting igonorance- that principle is: Contempt prior to Investigation." -Herbert Spencer |
|
#3
January 28th, 2003, 04:19 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re:panda antivirus
To Girobb from firefighter!
I have read from numerous checkvir.com tests, that Panda was the absolute best av-program to cure infected files among those programs (some 10 progs.) to be tested, including for example such programs as KAV, F-Secure, DrWeb, Sophos, Avast32, RAV, Norton, McAfee, Pc-Cillin, Norman etc.  About detection rates, I don't say anything. "The truth is out there, but it hurts" Regards, Firefighter!
__________________
Some savolax answer to the southern man: Q. No onko viiruksia näkynyt? A. No voe tokkiisa. Just äskönnii oes männynnä yks vuan en ehtinnä nähä. Tuolta saanan takkoo se männä jölököttel suorraah järvvee letit hulumuteh! |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
How good is Panda Anti-virus? I am curious about it. I run NOD 32,Trojan Hunter, and Sygate firewall. Is it a system hog, or is it lite similiar to NOD?
