![]() |
|
#101
|
|||
|
|||
|
I guess Intel is better in some cases, and encrypting should be one of them as it uses a special instruction set optimized a little better by Intel.
When looking at the new amd64 3000+Venice, you should get enough power for demanding tasks. Cause the new amd's are getting a stronger grip on the other area's lately as well .. |
|
#102
|
||||
|
||||
|
Oh how it would be to have a multi threaded benchmark, just for giggles here is the test score on my new Pentium D 840.
__________________
Dell 9100 Pentium D 840, 2g DDR2, WinXP Pro SP2, TDS-3, Process Guard, Port Explorer, CryptoSuite, RegDefend, KAV 5, BOClean, ZA+NAT, MS Antispyware, IESpyAd, SpywareBlaster, other security software too numerous to mention ;-). |
|
#103
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dothans are one of the best Processors made and I said that with Pentium M 770 too
I wonder why they cannot make something like that for Desktops .. the only thing happend is some mobo manufacturer created a custom made motherboard to use that processorhttp://www.gamepc.com/labs/view_cont...desktop&page=5 strange...cause the main issue with pentium is their heat .. biiiig issue compared to amd. That's a high end score for a laptop Calidan ![]() |
|
#104
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi,
The next one is very strange. Take Care, TheQuest ![]() Edit: Can not attact Image, even stranger
__________________
When Nothing is Certain, Anything is Possible. Last edited by TheQuest : July 6th, 2005 at 10:02 PM. Reason: Managed to upload it |
|
#105
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi, Jason
Have a look at this strange BM. Take Care, TheQuest ![]()
__________________
When Nothing is Certain, Anything is Possible. |
|
#106
|
|||
|
|||
|
Saw a similar BM here (but the system bluescreened before I could take a pic).
|
|
#107
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi, passing thru
Quote:
Take Care, TheQuest ![]() PS: What MB and CPU do you have [used for BM]? Asus A8N-E and AMD64 X2 4200 for mine.
__________________
When Nothing is Certain, Anything is Possible. |
|
#108
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi, Jason
Just bumping my #105 post Take Care, TheQuest ![]()
__________________
When Nothing is Certain, Anything is Possible. |
|
#109
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jason busy with working.
He already addressed this behaviour, it happens with new computers with high mhz's I believe. I wonder how superpi will do ![]() |
|
#110
|
||||
|
||||
|
My new box, stock, no overclock.
![]()
__________________
Dell 9100 Pentium D 840, 2g DDR2, WinXP Pro SP2, TDS-3, Process Guard, Port Explorer, CryptoSuite, RegDefend, KAV 5, BOClean, ZA+NAT, MS Antispyware, IESpyAd, SpywareBlaster, other security software too numerous to mention ;-). |
|
#111
|
||||
|
||||
|
There is an issue with validity of the encryption test taking place. If the system is unstable it seems to quickly "error" out of the encryption test, making it appear like it completed the operation quickly.
__________________
AppDefend - Protect your applications RegDefend - Protect your registry Ghost Security |
|
#112
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi, Jason_R0
Thank for getting back. Quote:
Quote:
, I am going to have to go back too Abit .Take Care, TheQuest ![]()
__________________
When Nothing is Certain, Anything is Possible. |
|
#113
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is from my new pc with no overclocking and several other apps running:
Dual core AMD 4400+ 1GB of DDR400 CS1.1 benchmark --------------[Benchmark finished]-------------- CPU Frequency: 2211MHz (+/- 5mhz) RAM Installed: 1022MB Total time taken: 15375ms Average time for each test: 2196ms ------------------------------------------------ Your computer scored: 32520 CRYPTOMARKS! ------------------------------------------------
__________________
"Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire" Pilli's website http://www.pilliwinks.net |
|
#114
|
||||
|
||||
|
I haven't installed anything to take a screen shot yet, but couldn't resist a couple of passes of the benchmark on my new box.
Out of the box with no overclocking it averaged 23500. Will post screenies as soon as I can. Pete |
|
#115
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would like some links to the old benchmark download ..
I have recently bought a x2 4400+ with 2*1024 OCZ 2-3-2-5 ... but what I get is like 22000 ... aren't you guys overclocking it? .. .. ![]()
__________________
... hmmmm .. so you're a signature reader ...
|
|
#116
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi infinity, I am not overclocking my PC nor was I at the time of the test.
Make sure you have no other backround programs running, as they may cause spurious / lower results Pilli
__________________
"Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire" Pilli's website http://www.pilliwinks.net |
|
#117
|
|||
|
|||
|
ok, cause this result I get is from overclocking 230*11 ... time to do it without any other processes in background (I should have done this from the first time lol)
Thanx
__________________
... hmmmm .. so you're a signature reader ...
|
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|