![]() |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
To err is human; to forgive, infrequent. - Franklin P. Adams |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Opera
FF Dragon IE last resort I think Chrome is for the unwashed masses. You'll get everything good it has in Dragon, SWR or Chromium.
__________________
PCLinuxOS - Radically simple, it just works. That's why PCLOS is "The Distro Hopper Stopper!" http://www.pclinuxos.com/ If you don't use Linux. You're going to HELL!!!
|
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Done.
![]() |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Completed the survey, but I'm staying with Firefox.
|
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
OS X 10.8.3 - 2.9 GHz Intel core i7 - 8 GB 1600 MHz DDR3 - 750 SATA HD - Intel HD 4000 Graphics 512 MB. |
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'd put that suggestion in the survey, if I were you. ![]()
__________________
To err is human; to forgive, infrequent. - Franklin P. Adams |
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Same. I thought I would provide them with the reasons why. Maybe they will try to compete, maybe not. |
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Completed the survey, thanks for informing us.
__________________
Kaspersky Internet Security 2013+HitmanPro+Malwarebytes Pro |
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I was not asked that question. ![]()
__________________
Emsisoft Anti-Malware v7.0.0.21 - Online Armor 6.0.0.1736 SRP - UAC - EMET Browser: Google Chrome v25.xx Windows 7 Ultimate x64 |
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() I think the survey is no longer appearing on the Chrome home page, but you can still follow the link in the first post. Quote:
__________________
To err is human; to forgive, infrequent. - Franklin P. Adams |
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Emsisoft Anti-Malware v7.0.0.21 - Online Armor 6.0.0.1736 SRP - UAC - EMET Browser: Google Chrome v25.xx Windows 7 Ultimate x64 |
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
✓The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool. ✓Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts. ✓I don't know anything, but I do know that everything is interesting if you go into it deeply enough. -------Richard P. Feynman--------- |
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
only a very slight edge to Firefox from me, but that's only because of the thus far inimitable NoScript plugin. However, Firefox can't match Chrome's sandboxing. In Ubuntu I use Chrome without hesitation with it "apparmored" ![]()
__________________
Win 7x64 Ultimate SUA | UAC @ Max | AppLocker w/DLL enforcement | Win fw w/advanced security| EMET 3.5 | Firefox w/NS +AdBlock+ plugins | GPO restrictions | Bitlocker and Truecrypt | ShadowProtect images | IFW data backups + dual boot to XP Pro: GPO, SRP, Jetico firewall w/Process Attack filter |
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It can only make it better.
__________________
To err is human; to forgive, infrequent. - Franklin P. Adams |
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
To err is human; to forgive, infrequent. - Franklin P. Adams |
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Oh yes, I sure did.
__________________
Win 7x64 Ultimate SUA | UAC @ Max | AppLocker w/DLL enforcement | Win fw w/advanced security| EMET 3.5 | Firefox w/NS +AdBlock+ plugins | GPO restrictions | Bitlocker and Truecrypt | ShadowProtect images | IFW data backups + dual boot to XP Pro: GPO, SRP, Jetico firewall w/Process Attack filter |
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
Didn't take the survey. Google doesn't need my input, they're doing just fine without it.
![]() |
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
|
I've only used it on other people's computers when I was at their place. They were Win7 boxes. And I hardened it for them, utilizing the integrated sandbox/restrictions which I saw in a thread in here (I think it was Kees).
I think it's the ideal browser for Win7, personally. But on XP I think Firefox takes the cake as the best option. I haven't used it enough to participate in that poll. But figured I'd give my impression based on my small sample size. And to be fair, IE has improved as well. I still believe it's the 3'rd best option of the 3, but it's no longer a poor browser by any means.
__________________
XP Pro SP3: Comodo FW/D+ 5.10 ▪ Sandboxie ▪ VT Hash Check ▪ OpenVPN ▪ VirtualBox |
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I wonder how much there would be to gain from a 64-bit Chrome, considering how it divides each tab into its own process. It seems that RAM usage wouldn't be a reason, as no one process ever gets very large. |
|
#45
|
||||
|
||||
|
The benefits of 64bit browsing are complicated.
From a 64bit perspective you gain a much improved ASLR. In terms of performance things get weird. There are some clear benefits (access to registers) and then some very unclear pitfalls (double the pointers is actually a potential issue for a browser that uses so many - an atypical usecase). Thankfully the x32 ABI for Linux addresses those pitfalls. You would likely see marked gains of 30-50% based on what I've read about the x32 ABI, which would be similar gains to 64bit. RAM usage/ the ability to address large amounts of data would likely do absolutely nothing. Chrome doesn't deal with files that large and no single process will ever use 4GB unless it is seriously misbehaving.
__________________
|
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks, just finished the survey. I like Firefox with NoScript better. But due to it's sandboxing feature I always recommend my friends and family to use Chrome. Chrome is much easier to use for the average user than Firefox with NoScript.
Also the day Iron updates as quickly as Chrome to fix security I might recommend it. The fact that it takes Iron sometime a week or 2 to fix security issues is a major issue in my book.
__________________
Security Software on my PC's: Desktop Win 7 Pro x64 Emsisoft Anti Malware v7. Laptop Win 7 Pro x64 & Desktop XP Pro Emsisoft Anti Malware v7 & Online Armor Premium v6 Netbook Win 7 Starter & Netbook XP Home Avast 7. MBAM & Hitman Pro used on demand only. |
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
An interesting survey.
Mrk
__________________
http://www.dedoimedo.com All your base are belong to us Linux Systems Expert / Systems Programmer, Linux System Administrator, LPIC-1, LPIC-2 (WIP), GSEC, CCHD, CCHA |
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
The one major issue, if you can really even call it that, for me is something I realize I neglected to provide feedback on. For me at least, Chrome does somewhat poorly with suggestions when you type a search term or lesser known address in the Omni Bar. I appreciate that it attempts to help, but I'd consider myself pretty good at spelling. I'd prefer if it didn't try to add an extra letter to a search term or a URL. Sometimes I end up with a search page of completely irrelevant results and have to manually edit the bar to get what I want.
|
|
#49
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
To err is human; to forgive, infrequent. - Franklin P. Adams |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|