![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
US government developing ultimate cyber weapon; Prime-factoring quantum computing makes encryption obsolete. http://www.naturalnews.com/036878_qu...t_secrets.html |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
It makes specific types of encryption a lot easier to bruteforce. That's all. Not every form of encryption relies on prime factoring.
__________________
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
FWIW, Mike Adams (the maintainer of Natural News) has a bit of a reputation for being ill-informed and jumping to conclusions.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The article is BS. Quantum Computing only invalidates public-key algorithms like RSA and El Gamal. It doesn't have much effect on symmetric block ciphers like AES (it will halve the AES keyspace, so if you use AES-256, it will become AES-128, which is still very strong).
Moreover, the government is likely at least a decade away from getting a workable QC that actually does something other than factor the number 15. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I'd argue even longer, at least a viable model.
__________________
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3514 |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
If there's Quantum Decryption, won't there also be Quantum Encryption as well?
PD |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It is not needed! Encryption/decryption is easy and well within the computing capabilities of a cash register. Bruteforcing... That's another story! Keep it simple, public and use a long, disposable key. I heard somewhere that the first exiom of cryptography is something like: key longer than the plaintext, good luck if plaintext is long enough. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-time_pad
__________________
Be good and do disturb! Not disturbed enough yet. danleonida-at-yahoo-dot-comm |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Off topic posts removed. Also, please don't cross post links to other threads to get them more attention. Not every thread about encryption needs a link to that same thread.
|
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|