![]() |
|
#76
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm considering writing my own seccomp profiles for programs like Pidgin and XChat.
Xchat doesn't update anymore so I don't really lose anything by recompiling it. Pidgin might be a pain. Xchat needs virtually no file system access so the apparmor profile is very strong. But... I do love that seccomp sandbox lol and it doesn't get patches. Where do you feel it's lacking?
__________________
|
|
#77
|
||||
|
||||
|
Archlinux, google chrome with web of trust and adblock.
Enabled SElinux. I wonder what else can be done?
__________________
Windows 8 with ESET Nod32 AV and Malwarebytes PRO Arch Linux with grsec + pax, clamav, Cinnamon desktop Main web browser: Google Chrome with Adblock (fanboy ultimate list subscription) and web of trust |
|
#78
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I like rkhunter to check for rootkits and lynis to check system configuration. They're both by the same company. |
|
#79
|
||||
|
||||
|
Set up SELinux profiles for various services and programs.
__________________
|
|
#80
|
||||
|
||||
|
Which is better btw, SELinux or Apparmor?
__________________
Windows 8 with ESET Nod32 AV and Malwarebytes PRO Arch Linux with grsec + pax, clamav, Cinnamon desktop Main web browser: Google Chrome with Adblock (fanboy ultimate list subscription) and web of trust |
|
#81
|
||||
|
||||
|
That's hard to say. SELinux is more powerful but Apparmor is a million times easier to use. Bypasses that'll work for Apparmor (like giving mount rights along with other rights) won't work for SELinux and you can get ridiculously fine grained access control on SELinux.
Apparmor is better, in my opinion, because anyone can write a profile. I'd rather have 100 processes running in the potentially weaker Apparmor than have just 10 running in the potentially stronger SELinux.
__________________
|
|
#82
|
||||
|
||||
|
Network
DDWRT Router running recommended build - Remote Access disabled DDWRT firewall turned on OpenDNS with DNSCrypt Realtime Protection No AV running. All ports closed - no need for a firewall. System Hardening -- Ubuntu 12.04 Kernel 3.4.X Optimized for i5 CPUs Pax + Grsecurity, custom kernel with custom settings. As few programs installed as possible. BIOS Password Apparmor Enabled - Profiles for all programs and various services Browser -- Chrome Beta Seccomp Sandbox + Default Sandbox + AppArmor Block 3rd Party Cookies Built in malware protection Default PDF reader -- no adobe necessary Adblock Plus with DNT HTTPS Everywhere Javascript whitelist by TLD Cookie whitelist by HTTPS A "private" profile with more aggressive privacy/ data settings. Chrome Privacy Profile No cookies/ no data sent to Google Block form validation ScriptNo with strict settings
__________________
|
|
#83
|
||||
|
||||
|
Heh slightly similar to mine (Random list):
Tomato Toastman WRT54G (IPv6 build, firewall, no remote access) Hardened Gentoo ~amd64 Hardened Sources (always latest ~arch) completely minimal and thoroughly revised, GRSec + PAX on custom (too many to list, max possible security) Hardened toolchain Sysctl network hardening, grsec.lock = 1 Minimal compiled programs OpenBox WM ZSH + urxvtd Tor + Sasl for IRC IPv6 tempaddress Truecrypt containers Immutable history files No root tty logins Fstab hardening Iptables default deny SSH key only auth Most services running as their own isolated user/group Browsers (No flash / Java) Chromium 9999: Incognito Adblock, (easylist, easyprivacy) Privoxy Seccomp Sandbox --disk-cache-dir=/tmp Javascript whitelist Clear cookies on close No tracking Firefox: Noscript Adblock Plus Privoxy Block third party cookies Clear all data on close No tracking about:config tweaks It's all pretty pointless, but doesn't affect usablility a single bit so why not. Used to use RBAC but disabled it (PITA for desktop maintenance). Everything is mprotected with full aslr/hardening and all programs compiled with fully hardened gcc. I'd like to try apparmor for per-program restrictions, it's available in the kernel, and tools in an overlay but afaik only Ubuntu has full support for it. I like a set and forget machine though. Last edited by Gentoo64 : June 14th, 2012 at 07:08 PM. |
|
#84
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah I should really get around to using Gentoo but I really like Unity and I don't think it works with it.
__________________
|
|
#85
|
||||
|
||||
|
Network
DDWRT Router running recommended build - Remote Access disabled DDWRT firewall turned on OpenDNS with DNSCrypt All ports closed - no Avahi, Cups, or dnsmasq GUFW inbound/ outbound firewall enabled System Hardening -- Ubuntu 12.04 Kernel 3.4.X Pax + Grsecurity, custom kernel with custom settings Removed many default programs and dependencies BIOS Password Apparmor Enabled - Profiles for all programs and various services Open Source GPU Drivers Browser -- Chrome Dev Seccomp Sandbox + Default Sandbox + AppArmor + GPU Sandbox Block 3rd Party Cookies Built in malware protection Default PDF reader Adblock Plus with DNT HTTPS Everywhere Javascript whitelist by TLD Cookie whitelist by HTTPS A "private" profile with more aggressive privacy/ data settings. Chrome Privacy Profile No cookies/ 'Privacy' boxes unchecked Block form validation Incognito Only
__________________
|
|
#86
|
||||
|
||||
|
Finally added GUFW outbound protection. I'm working on hardening the network aspect of the setup.
__________________
|
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|