Wilders Security Forums  

Go Back   Wilders Security Forums > Official Returnil Support Forum > General Returnil discussions
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old May 24th, 2012, 11:23 PM
TomAZ TomAZ is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 336
Default Returnil 2008 vs MBAM Pro

I posted this same question over at the Piriform Forum, but one of the Mods there suggested that I might get better help here. I really prefer keeping my older version of Returnil because it's not bloated, light on resources and extremely stable So, here's the question:

I use the most current version MBAM Pro and run it resident. However, every time I activate Returnil 2008, for some reason it screws up my MBAM installation after the reboot and I end up having to re-install MBAM.

Any ideas on how I might be able to avoid this problem?
  #2  
Old May 25th, 2012, 12:00 AM
Dark Shadow's Avatar
Dark Shadow Dark Shadow is offline
Massive Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 4,550
Default Re: Returnil 2008 vs MBAM Pro

Its been years since I used returnil but is there not some exclusion for program files.
__________________
OS X 10.8.3 - 2.9 GHz Intel core i7 - 8 GB 1600 MHz DDR3 - 750 SATA HD - Intel HD 4000 Graphics 512 MB.
  #3  
Old May 25th, 2012, 09:30 AM
Coldmoon's Avatar
Coldmoon Coldmoon is offline
Returnil Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North Carolina USA
Posts: 2,744
Default Re: Returnil 2008 vs MBAM Pro

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomAZ
I posted this same question over at the Piriform Forum, but one of the Mods there suggested that I might get better help here. I really prefer keeping my older version of Returnil because it's not bloated, light on resources and extremely stable So, here's the question:

I use the most current version MBAM Pro and run it resident. However, every time I activate Returnil 2008, for some reason it screws up my MBAM installation after the reboot and I end up having to re-install MBAM.

Any ideas on how I might be able to avoid this problem?

Hi TomAZ,
Can you detail the steps to reproduce this and the text of any errors?

Mike
__________________
Returnil: The Real Security!
Follow us on Facebook
  #4  
Old May 25th, 2012, 09:44 PM
TomAZ TomAZ is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 336
Default Re: Returnil 2008 vs MBAM Pro

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldmoon
Hi TomAZ,
Can you detail the steps to reproduce this and the text of any errors?

Mike
I haven't attempted to reproduce this issue since posting my comment. Instead, I've been working on a solution or workaround, which I think I've found. I took djohn's advice and simply protected the whole MBAM folder from within Returnil. I've only tested it a couple times, but it seems to have corrected the problem.

As I mentioned, I'm using an old version of Returnil (2008 Personal) along with the most current version of MBAM. So, maybe this has something to do with it, but I really don't want to upgrade my Returnil -- love the version I have.

Because I really haven't tried to re-create the problem, I can't remember exactly what the error message was, but there was one. As I recall, during the startup after a reboot, it said something like "MBAM did not load properly" (probably a little wordier, but that was the gist of it). Even a second or third reboot wouldn't fix it, so I would have to reinstall MBAM.

Anyway, thanks to both of you. I'll try this for a while and see what happens.
 

Wilders Security Forums > Official Returnil Support Forum > General Returnil discussions « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, Wilders Security Forums