![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
For the past several years I've been making backups of my Vista system (with Acronis True Image if that matters). I know I'm a 'Johnny Come Lately', as here we are on the dawn of Windows 8 and I just bought a new laptop with Windows 7. I see that Windows 7 has a special (small) system partition in addition to the 'usual' C-partition (which I don't think existed in Vista)! So I'm wondering how this affects image-backups. Should I just backup the main system partition (as I did with Vista) or should I also backup that small system partition?
I realize that in all likelihood this was probably asked and answered before; I just can't find any relevant posts. Please just point me to them if they exist. TIA, Cruise PS. The new laptop's drive is much larger than I will need for my computing needs so I'd like to divide it into 2 or 3 partitions. I've partitioned drives in the past but I'm wondering if there's anything special about Win7 in that regard. Last edited by Cruise : May 7th, 2012 at 11:03 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windo...windows-vista/
__________________
NOD32, Sandboxie (Paid), AppGuard, Malwarebytes Anti-Malware, Emsisoft Emergency Kit, DrWeb Cureit, AVIRA Rescue CD, Image for Windows/Image for DOS/Image for Linux, Firefox (Adblock Plus, Subscriptions: EasyList+EasyPrivacy+Malware Domains), Norton DNS |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You can get rid of this: http://www.terabyteunlimited.com/kb/article.php?id=409 Best regards, KOR! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Check what partition is set as "active". If this small partition is the active one, you must backup it because it is necessary for booting. The size of the system partition can be reduced safely using Windows Disk Manager. But this program can leave a too large system partition, because it doesnīt move files. If you want a smaller system partition, you can use a third-party partition manager to reduce it further. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks guys. As I have a 750GB hard drive, I'm thinking of downsizing my main system partition to about 50GB which should be large enough for Win7, IE, and my program files (including spare-room). Then I would create a 2nd partition of about 200GB, which should be more than large enought for my data, docs, music, and photos, and a 3rd partition with the disk-storage balance that I would use for daily online backups (I would also backup to an external drive on a weekly frequent basis).
Does anyone see a potential problem with this? Cruise |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Only you know how large your data partition should be, so I can't really say any more about that other than I also keep virtual machines on my data partition, so I need some more room for those. Insofar as using a 3rd partition for daily backups, I think that's a smart practice (as long as you definitely adhere to saving weekly image-backups to an external drive!). Actually, instead of daily backups, you might consider a continuous backup program, such as Second Copy 8, which constantly monitors changes and automatically backs them up (with version control)! Scott
__________________
My Security Blanket: MSE + PrivateFirewall + RollBack Rx + Shadow Defender ...and I backup with Drive Snapshot (just in case)! Last edited by Scott W : May 8th, 2012 at 06:35 PM. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
For me, 50 GB for Windows 7 x64 is not enough. The current installation, which doesnīt contain any "data", is 32 GB, and I need space to use the Returnil cache. My size is 100 GB.
And I donīt like to keep backups in the boot disk. If the disk fails, everything is lost. My backups are in two USB external disks. I also back up the most critical data in the cloud. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scott,
Thanks very much. I think I will bump my Windows partition to 70GB, as I am intrigued by Rollback Rx. Also, thanks for that continuous backup suggestion (Second Copy). I will consider that as well as a continuous Cloud backup service like SugarSync. Cruise |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Cruise |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I use SugarSync. it has worked well for me so far, although some interfaces are confusing.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And a SugarSync question: Is there any noticeable operational slowdown while SS is running in the background? |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
I donīt pay for SugarSync, I use the free service (5 GB), and only upload some critical (for me) information, pre-encrypted.
I do this to complete the backup strategy, because all my physical backups are "under one roof" and could be lost in case of a disaster (theft, fire, etc.). I havenīt noticed slowdowns when SS is uploading. I use the "medium" speed setting for upload. My uploads take more than an hour. |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|