Wilders Security Forums  

Go Back   Wilders Security Forums > Privacy Related Topics > privacy technology
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old April 13th, 2012, 05:09 PM
personguy666 personguy666 is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 66
Default another q about TOR

ok i was using the latest browser bundle (TOR) when i accidentally put cursor over the noscript (i think) button @ top left corner and it gave me a popup menu option: forbid scripts globally (advised)
normally (w/ default torbundle settings) this option is not used.
does that mean there are ip leaks?
or is the browser autoconfigured to block some scripts and allow others (ie js)
  #2  
Old April 13th, 2012, 06:51 PM
personguy666 personguy666 is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 66
Default Re: another q about TOR

um...bump?
  #3  
Old April 13th, 2012, 07:50 PM
CasperFace's Avatar
CasperFace CasperFace is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 200
Default Re: another q about TOR

JavaScript (by itself) cannot leak your IP address, so it's a non-issue. Whether you want to allow scripts globally, deny, or allow selectively is entirely up to you... based on your personal preferences.

With regard to IP leaks, the main area of concern should be to keep your browser plugins under control. That includes Java (applets, not JavaScript), Flash, ActiveX, Silverlight, etc. As long as those remain blocked, you will be fine.

If you want to avoid this hassle altogether, your best option would probably be to "socksify" your browser using a 3rd party application such as FreeCap, WideCap, SocksCap, Super Socks5Cap, or ProxyCap. That way, all browser activity--including plugins--are forced through Tor... which means you'll no longer have to worry about IP leakage.
  #4  
Old April 13th, 2012, 08:06 PM
personguy666 personguy666 is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 66
Default Re: another q about TOR

thanks
another question i went on ip-check.info with tor bundle and the cache field was red.
can ip/real location leak thru cache?
  #5  
Old April 13th, 2012, 09:55 PM
CasperFace's Avatar
CasperFace CasperFace is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 200
Default Re: another q about TOR

Quote:
can ip/real location leak thru cache?
No. As long as your anonymous browser profile remains separate from your real-identity profile, there is no possibility for leaks. Cached E-Tags are similar to cookies, in that it's just another way for remote sites to remember you. This may be of concern from a privacy standpoint, but it won't break your anonymity.
  #6  
Old April 22nd, 2012, 02:06 PM
personguy666 personguy666 is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 66
Default Re: another q about TOR

but cookies/cache don't transfer between browsers (ie chrome and firefox w/ tor) right?
  #7  
Old April 22nd, 2012, 07:25 PM
marktor marktor is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 143
Default Re: another q about TOR

Quote:
Originally Posted by personguy666
but cookies/cache don't transfer between browsers (ie chrome and firefox w/ tor) right?

Right. If you are using the tor browser bundle the cookies/cache you have in chrome and IE should not matter. Though personally I would just keep those clear as well.
  #8  
Old April 22nd, 2012, 08:42 PM
personguy666 personguy666 is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 66
Default Re: another q about TOR

oh thanks.
also when i go on ip-check.info it says that it's bad that i have lots of fonts on my computer.
can the font# really be used to find your real ip address? how does that work?
  #9  
Old April 22nd, 2012, 09:36 PM
CasperFace's Avatar
CasperFace CasperFace is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 200
Default Re: another q about TOR

Quote:
Originally Posted by personguy666
oh thanks.
also when i go on ip-check.info it says that it's bad that i have lots of fonts on my computer.
can the font# really be used to find your real ip address?
No, it can't. In fact, I wouldn't worry about it at all. They're just pointing out a component of a theoretical attack known as "browser fingerprinting" which, in this case, has absolutely nothing to do with being able to pinpoint IP addresses. Keep in mind that while IP-check.info is a useful tool, ultimately they want to sell you their product... so naturally some of those "warnings" tend to be greatly exaggerated.
  #10  
Old April 23rd, 2012, 05:13 PM
personguy666 personguy666 is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 66
Default Re: another q about TOR

Quote:
Originally Posted by marktor
Right. If you are using the tor browser bundle the cookies/cache you have in chrome and IE should not matter. Though personally I would just keep those clear as well.
but they do matter in regular firefox browser right? if you have a different regular firefox
  #11  
Old April 23rd, 2012, 10:40 PM
CasperFace's Avatar
CasperFace CasperFace is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 200
Default Re: another q about TOR

Quote:
Originally Posted by personguy666
but they do matter in regular firefox browser right? if you have a different regular firefox
If you have two different Firefox browsers (let's say one 'regular' FF and one Tor Browser) then each one will have its own separate cache/cookies directory. Since the profiles are totally independent of one another, there is no possibility of cross-contamination while browsing.

Only your plugin directories (Flash cache, Sun Java cache, etc.) are shared between multiple browser instances.
  #12  
Old April 24th, 2012, 01:53 PM
lotuseclat79 lotuseclat79 is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,916
Default Re: another q about TOR

Quote:
Originally Posted by personguy666
ok i was using the latest browser bundle (TOR) when i accidentally put cursor over the noscript (i think) button @ top left corner and it gave me a popup menu option: forbid scripts globally (advised)
normally (w/ default torbundle settings) this option is not used.
does that mean there are ip leaks?
or is the browser autoconfigured to block some scripts and allow others (ie js)
Hi personguy666,

You should always forbid scripts globally with NoScript, and then selectively allow them to view the contents of web pages which rely on Javascript being allowed to see content - but, not globally.

-- Tom
  #13  
Old April 24th, 2012, 04:05 PM
personguy666 personguy666 is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 66
Default Re: another q about TOR

^why isn't that the default setting for tor??
  #14  
Old April 25th, 2012, 06:29 AM
lotuseclat79 lotuseclat79 is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,916
Default Re: another q about TOR

Hi personguy666,

It is a NoScript (Options)>General setting which is a Firefox add-on - i.e. it is not a part of Tor. If you check in your FF browser NoScript (Options)>General settings you should see that Scripts Globally Allowed (dangeroous) is NOT checked, i.e. then it is being enforced and is a default setting when used with Tor.

-- Tom
  #15  
Old April 25th, 2012, 03:50 PM
personguy666 personguy666 is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 66
Default Re: another q about TOR

that is true
but "globally blocked" isn't checked either i think.
will my ip leak if i leave it that way??
  #16  
Old April 25th, 2012, 05:43 PM
lotuseclat79 lotuseclat79 is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,916
Default Re: another q about TOR

Globally blocked is not an option, but it means the same as an unchecked Globally Allowed.

-- Tom
  #17  
Old April 25th, 2012, 08:21 PM
personguy666 personguy666 is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 66
Default Re: another q about TOR

ok the option is "forbid scripts globally".
and it is not used by default
  #18  
Old April 26th, 2012, 07:43 AM
lotuseclat79 lotuseclat79 is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,916
Default Re: another q about TOR

When you say "forbid scripts globally" if that description is not in NoScript, then in what software/version number? Are you talking about a specific version of Firefox or the Tor browser bundle? If so, then what is its name and version number?

-- Tom
  #19  
Old April 26th, 2012, 04:52 PM
personguy666 personguy666 is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 66
Default Re: another q about TOR

it's next to the green onion button next to the forward back buttons
in top left corner of torbrowser...
  #20  
Old April 26th, 2012, 05:01 PM
lotuseclat79 lotuseclat79 is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,916
Default Re: another q about TOR

What I asked you was what software/version - you said Torbrowser. What version of the Torbrowser - is it Firefox version 10, 10.2, 11,...? Are you using a Torbrowser bundle? If you right-click "it" does it give you an options list for a Firefox add-on? If so, it should allow you to check "forbid scripts globally" to set it as the default. Hopefully, what you are talking about is the NoScript Firefox add-on.

Also, perchance, are you on a Windows platform?

The reason I ask is that I do not use the Tor Browserbundle, I use TAILS from a Live USB which uses Iceweasel, a Firefox derivative with NoScript. It so happens to be in a Linux Debian environment.

-- Tom

Last edited by lotuseclat79 : April 27th, 2012 at 08:30 AM.
  #21  
Old April 26th, 2012, 05:47 PM
personguy666 personguy666 is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 66
Default Re: another q about TOR

using the latest tor bundle.
  #22  
Old May 2nd, 2012, 07:22 PM
personguy666 personguy666 is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 66
Default Re: another q about TOR

could i get an answer?
all torbundle settings are default
  #23  
Old May 2nd, 2012, 07:45 PM
chronomatic chronomatic is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,324
Default Re: another q about TOR

Quote:
Originally Posted by CasperFace
If you want to avoid this hassle altogether, your best option would probably be to "socksify" your browser using a 3rd party application such as FreeCap, WideCap, SocksCap, Super Socks5Cap, or ProxyCap. That way, all browser activity--including plugins--are forced through Tor... which means you'll no longer have to worry about IP leakage.

If I am not mistaken, the Tor browser bundle does this by default. Someone correct me if I am wrong.
  #24  
Old May 2nd, 2012, 07:52 PM
personguy666 personguy666 is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 66
Default Re: another q about TOR

block all scripts by default it does not apparently.
like i said theres a noscript button in left upper corner.
  #25  
Old May 5th, 2012, 04:48 PM
personguy666 personguy666 is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 66
Default Re: another q about TOR

<bump>
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/3007
this is what the official site says.
 

Wilders Security Forums > Privacy Related Topics > privacy technology « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, Wilders Security Forums