|
|
#1
July 29th, 2011, 12:20 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Chrome and SpywareBlaster
I wish Javacool would make SpywareBlaster Chrome-compatible.
I don't know whether it's a good thing or a bad thing that I can't use SpywareBlaster anymore, now that I use Chrome almost exclusively. I mean, does Chrome have extra protection and not need the sort of restricted protection that SpywareBlaster provides? Or could Chrome really use the help, but we're waiting in limbo for the developer to release an upgrade? Meanwhile, I still update the program, for those rare instances when I might run Internet Explorer. 
__________________
To err is human; to forgive, infrequent. - Franklin P. Adams |
|
#2
July 29th, 2011, 12:21 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chrome and SpywareBlaster
I wish they can improve Firefox protection. Blacklisting some cookies is near worthless, which is why I haven't kept it.
__________________
|
|
#3
July 29th, 2011, 12:24 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chrome and SpywareBlaster
Quote:
__________________
To err is human; to forgive, infrequent. - Franklin P. Adams |
|
#4
July 29th, 2011, 12:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chrome and SpywareBlaster
It's lacking for all browsers except Internet Explorer.
__________________
|
|
#5
July 29th, 2011, 08:46 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chrome and SpywareBlaster
I wouldn't even use it in IE considering blocking 3rd party cookies and/or using TPL's are far superior options.
__________________
OpenDNS with DNSCrypt SSD: Windows 8 Pro x64 | IE10 (Enhanced Protected Mode) & Fanboy's TPLs HDD: Xubuntu 12.04 LTS (x64) | Firefox: ABP(Fanboy's list) & HTTPS Everywhere |
|
#6
July 29th, 2011, 08:57 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chrome and SpywareBlaster
Those TPLs are just for IE9?
(I'm perusing the link in your sig but haven't seen that answer)
__________________
To err is human; to forgive, infrequent. - Franklin P. Adams |
|
#7
July 29th, 2011, 12:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chrome and SpywareBlaster
Quote:
Woops, yes, forgot some people use older versions.
__________________
OpenDNS with DNSCrypt SSD: Windows 8 Pro x64 | IE10 (Enhanced Protected Mode) & Fanboy's TPLs HDD: Xubuntu 12.04 LTS (x64) | Firefox: ABP(Fanboy's list) & HTTPS Everywhere |
|
#8
July 29th, 2011, 12:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chrome and SpywareBlaster
If there is one thing that is going to eventually push me into buying a couple new computers, it'll be security concerns.
I'd be using IE9 if I wasn't on XP. (At least I'd be comparing it to Chrome) But I'm stuck with IE8. And I keep reading that Win7 is much more secure than XP... like in that 3 out of 4 rootkit thread. But so far I am not motivated enough to make that transition. It'll be fun though, when I finally do!
__________________
To err is human; to forgive, infrequent. - Franklin P. Adams |
|
#9
July 29th, 2011, 09:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Chrome and SpywareBlaster
Hi,
Per another thread, Chrome is on the to-do list. I can't say anymore just right now, but be assured we're aware of the desire for Chrome support. Best regards, -Javacool
__________________
*Official BrightFort Website* *SpywareBlaster* *Please note: I am not responsible if any advice herein causes any trouble whatsoever *
|
|
#10
July 29th, 2011, 10:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chrome and SpywareBlaster
Quote:
__________________
To err is human; to forgive, infrequent. - Franklin P. Adams |
|
#12
March 7th, 2012, 11:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Chrome and SpywareBlaster
Quote:
hope to see that soon javacool  |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
