V5 and Outpost

[toxinon12345]

Originally Posted by Motherroad

That is what I am finding out. Will disable the HIPS in NOD for now.

not necessary, just restore HIPS to default settings

[Escalader]

Originally Posted by toxinon12345

not necessary, just restore HIPS to default settings

We are forgetting Stems advice in post following:

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showp...3&postcount=18


Nod32 OFF on HIPS it is buggy, Outpost ON.

I'm following that.

BTW when I had Nod32 on interactive and OP on Rules wizard with OP's HIPS features OFF I got a freeze and had to reboot.

Since following the advice in post 18 no more BSOD's or freezes.

[toxinon12345]

Originally Posted by Escalader

when I had Nod32 on interactive and OP on Rules wizard with OP's HIPS features OFF I got a freeze and had to reboot.

disable the realtime anti malware protection, the anti-leak control, the component control and the system guard and other components such as file/registry access control before switching NOD32 HIPS to interactive mode.

Even better if you can prevent the respective Outpost's drivers from loading, as that can be conflicting with NOD drivers and causing you performance problems.

[Stem]

Originally Posted by Escalader

Nod32 OFF on HIPS it is buggy,

That is actually an understatement.

I have been re-checking with just NOD AV installed.

If this was an alpha, or an early beta, then I would make some bug reports. But as it is classed as an RC, then it is a joke, and not worth the effort.

- Stem

[Escalader]

Originally Posted by Stem

That is actually an understatement.

I have been re-checking with just NOD AV installed.

If this was an alpha, or an early beta, then I would make some bug reports. But as it is classed as an RC, then it is a joke, and not worth the effort.

- Stem

I hope that since NOD is here as a support forum that they will ask you for the bug reports and improve their product.

This practice of vendors (not just ESET) rushing products out before they are ready is a BIG issue in our business it really does need to be dealt with.

[ashishsingh1508]

I am using NOD32 ver 5 RC with Outpost 7.5.1(with Web Control and without antispyware) and both are running like butter...:-)

[ashishsingh1508]

I first did clean install of outpost with web control and left anti spyware and then installed nod32.
I have excluded outpost folder from nod32 realtime scanning and its running great

[Escalader]

Originally Posted by ashishsingh1508

I first did clean install of outpost with web control and left anti spyware and then installed nod32.
I have excluded outpost folder from nod32 realtime scanning and its running great

All I can offer you is:

1) Nod is supposed to install first so OP can "adjust" so as to avoid compatibility issues. You have forgone any benefits that may provide.
2) the support forum for OP is NOT here at Wilders but at

http://www.outpostfirewall.com/forum/forum.php

3) I'm gald you are excluding these products from each other and running smooth.

[gibradford]

Whats the bottom line on this? Nod32 HIPS off, Outpost ON? Or is it perfectly alright to have both HIPS features enabled?

[Escalader]

Originally Posted by gibradford

Whats the bottom line on this? Nod32 HIPS off, Outpost ON? Or is it perfectly alright to have both HIPS features enabled?

Please see the post below for the bottom line.

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showp...8&postcount=27

[siberianwolf]

interesting thread. any news on this?

[Syobon]

One security suite is already too much, you are draining your system performance...

[siberianwolf]

Originally Posted by Syobon

One security suite is already too much, you are draining your system performance...

the op, escalader that is, is a computer savvy buddy. so i don't think he'd have a setup taht'd drain and drown his system performance.
besides, it ain't security suite but a standalone av sw & a standalone fw sw they're talking about here. moreover, he's talking about possible conflicts that might be caused by having hips component of that av sw enabled, so that he's asking other folks' opinions on whether to disable that component and the installation order that'd help getting over w/ conflict issues.
cheers