![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I know PatchGuard made it hard/near impossible for rootkits to infect an x64 system and retain system stability, but how about kernel level keyloggers? Since PatchGuard protects the kernel, are keyloggers that don't use TDL3's method of infection still hindered by PatchGuard?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
PatchGuard can't protect against kernel-level keyloggers as they are using legitimate IRP filtering. Or it may use another trick (driver device function hook) PG does not control.
__________________
DefenseWall HIPS developer. www.softsphere.com |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
then 64 is not as secure as they promissed
![]()
__________________
Emsisoft Anti-Malware 7.0/WebRo0t AntiVirus 2o13 |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It was only a matter of time until x64 would be exposed to threats it supposedly would be immune to. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Ubuntu 12.10 AX64 Time Machine, Comodo FW & Defence Plus, |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
No. Test the Zemana keylogger or Spyshelters keylogger on a Windows x64 system and you'll have the evidence right there. Please note that those keyloggers are not actually malware, but merely testing tools. ![]() |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is only one really working protection mechanism to prevent malware in kernel mode- loading only signed driver files. But it can be subverted with MBR trick. PatchGuard doesn't protect the system as advertised.
__________________
DefenseWall HIPS developer. www.softsphere.com |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
agree
![]()
__________________
Emsisoft Anti-Malware 7.0/WebRo0t AntiVirus 2o13 |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Ubuntu 12.10 AX64 Time Machine, Comodo FW & Defence Plus, |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|