OPEN QUESTION TO LEAPFROG (Todd)

[Genady Prishnikov]

Could you explain what led to the crippled version of FD-ISR?
Simple question. Inquiring minds want to know - the truth.
It gets down to trust between a developer and users. What's done is done, but can you PLEASE simply answer why?

[Leapfrog Software]

I am not at liberty to discuss this matter at this time.

[Genady Prishnikov]

Because....it's in a contract somewhere?
Because....?
This affected a lot of people and just saying you're not at liberty to talk about it is not being very upfront with the end-user.
Stonewalling never works in business. Never has. Never will.
But thanks for at least telling us that you can't tell us. For what it's worth.

[Acadia]

Genady, take a deep breath and count to ten, it's just not THAT important (and besides, now that Todd is back , we don't want to scare him away! ).

Acadia

[Genady Prishnikov]

Originally Posted by Acadia

Genady, take a deep breath and count to ten, it's just not THAT important (and besides, now that Todd is back , we don't want to scare him away! ).

Acadia

Fair enough. Counting now...

[TouchuvGrey]

Originally Posted by Leapfrog Software

I am not at liberty to discuss this matter at this time.

Can you tell us when you will be able to discuss it ?

[Peter2150]

Originally Posted by TouchuvGrey

Can you tell us when you will be able to discuss it ?

This is a round about way of trying to get him to talk about something he plainly isn't going to do. Better to leave it until he is ready. Besides it isn't going to change anything.

[tradetime]

Originally Posted by Peter2150

This is a round about way of trying to get him to talk about something he plainly isn't going to do. Better to leave it until he is ready. Besides it isn't going to change anything.

I'd be inclined to agree, clearly Todd reads the boards from time to time, and given there has been a great deal of comment and speculation over fd-isr I'm sure he would have commented if he were at liberty to do so.