What Do You Think Is The Best Download Manager

Discussion in 'polls' started by AnthonyG, Feb 15, 2005.

?

What Do You Think Is The Best Download Manager

  1. GetRight

    18 vote(s)
    8.0%
  2. Flashget

    38 vote(s)
    17.0%
  3. Download Accellerator

    10 vote(s)
    4.5%
  4. Internet Download Manager

    51 vote(s)
    22.8%
  5. Teleport Pro

    1 vote(s)
    0.4%
  6. Net Transport

    5 vote(s)
    2.2%
  7. Mass Downloader

    1 vote(s)
    0.4%
  8. Firefox/Mozilla Download Manager

    44 vote(s)
    19.6%
  9. Other (id really apreciate you saying what that is)

    70 vote(s)
    31.3%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. iwod

    iwod Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Posts:
    708
    Wellget

    1. Good interface - Improvement on the all familiar Flashget
    2. Light on Resource

    And Free

    Although i am using opera 8 and its downloader is already very good.
     
  2. WSFuser

    WSFuser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Posts:
    10,639
    getright is my download manager, tho if im in a hurry ill just use firefox's download manager as i have dsl.
     
  3. shek

    shek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Posts:
    342
    Location:
    SE CHINA/NYC USA
    one vote for net transport, which not only support http/https/ftp, but also mms/rtsp
     
  4. sunnaan2003

    sunnaan2003 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Posts:
    2
    FlashGet is the best download manager and you can confirm it by using version 1.72 build 128 or later of FlashGet.
    It has a Batch download feature and a built-in Site Explorer which connot be compared with other download managers.
    It also gets date and time from server with each file. It's got a toolbar too.
    :)
    Sunnaan
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 16, 2006
  5. sunnaan2003

    sunnaan2003 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Posts:
    2
    LeechGet

    LeechGet is a graphically heavy download manager although it is cute and fast enough at least for dialup connections.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 16, 2006
  6. zapjb

    zapjb Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2005
    Posts:
    5,556
    Location:
    USA still the best. But barely.
    Well after a couple years with Net Transport (last freeware version). I've come back to my 1st luv dl manager FlashGet. Because FlashGet is now FREEWARE!!! And it's better than I remember.:D
     
  7. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,934
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    I use the download manager that comes in Opera browser. works very well. :thumb:
     
  8. Osaban

    Osaban Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Posts:
    5,616
    Location:
    Milan and Seoul
    Ditto.
     
  9. herbalist

    herbalist Guest

    Although it's not actually a download manager, Shareaza does a good job as one. I used it to download the PCBSD and Ubuntu 5.1 ISO images, 677mb and 617mb respectively. Did this with my old 98 box using dial-up internet service with a one hour connection time limit.
    Rick
     
  10. snowbound

    snowbound Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Posts:
    8,723
    Location:
    The Big Smoke
    Again. :)



    snowbound
     
  11. gerardwil

    gerardwil Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2004
    Posts:
    4,750
    Location:
    EU
    I don't use one or if you call that a manager the one within FireFox.
    I cannot imagine what the benefits are when using a Download Manager.

    Gerard
     
  12. TairikuOkami

    TairikuOkami Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2005
    Posts:
    3,432
    Location:
    Slovakia
    Download manager helps to resume download and I can not download almost anything via IE due to my restrictions, so I use Free Download Manager to be able to download files. [​IMG]
     
  13. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    Re: LeechGet

    It uses more resouces than star downloader free and Free Doenload manager( though still only around 5-6 MB), but I am surprized I did not see the option of virus scan in the free version of it.
     
  14. sukarof

    sukarof Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Posts:
    1,887
    Location:
    Stockholm Sweden
    The other day I found "DownThemAll" extension for firefox. It is a neat extension imo.
     
  15. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    Ya, I used it too. Its good.
     
  16. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    Another small download manger that needs no installation is WakeGet. So probably u can run it from any media, however I have not used it.
     
  17. herbalist

    herbalist Guest

    Another advantage of a download manager is the ability to re-download certain files on a regular schedule, at least Star Downloader lets you do this. It can be set to keep the download links when they're finished and just click on "re-download" when you want to update the downloaded file. I use it to update F-Prot for DOS and AntiVir version 6 (don't like version 7) and automatically send the files to the proper folders. Combined with a few simple batch files to unzip the archives, it works almost as well as the updater that comes with most AVs. The ability to set up multiple categories for the downloads and assigning each one a unique destination saves a lot of file sorting later.
    Star Downloader also has a "download basket" (actually a normal sized movable icon) that stays on top of your work if desired. You can drag and drop almost anything on it and it downloads it. Works good with most any kind of file, images, music files, PDFs, and other file types that a browser would normally open instead of saving it to disk.
    If there is a disadvantage to using a download manager like Star Downloader, it would be that it tries to use all the available banwidth, especially of you use dialup. When I have more than one download running and try to browse the web, it will either badly slow down the browser (Mozilla) or stop it from opening anything at all (IE6). I usually pause the downloads right after it establishes the download links and gets the file info, then resume them later on. IMO, the AV integration feature and a pause button that lets you resume the downloads hours or even days later are more than enough to justify using one.
    While a download manager might not be that much of an advantge when you have high speed service, it's a lifesaver if you're on dialup or are stuck with unreliable internet service.
    Rick
     
  18. gerardwil

    gerardwil Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2004
    Posts:
    4,750
    Location:
    EU
    Thanks guys for answering.
    But I think I stay like it is now, but will investigate some DM's
    I am on a 6 Mb dsl connection, so things go pretty fast.

    Gerard
     
  19. iceni60

    iceni60 ( ^o^)

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2004
    Posts:
    5,116
    i'm certain Leechget is the best. i have an old version which has alot more features then later versions. it has more options then any other program i've ever seen.

    i was going to upload my copy to an upload site so you can all try it out and see how good it is but i found a copy on the internet which is the same version i have; the md5 checksums are the same - e2d8038655eb28736ddd7bd62b41a17a

    http://www.worldstart.com/tips/tips.php/1826
    direct download :cool:
     
  20. PaulBB

    PaulBB Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Posts:
    722
    FlashGet is the best free download manager around.
     
  21. taihaukau

    taihaukau Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2006
    Posts:
    6
    Internet Download Accelerator (IDA)
     
  22. sweater

    sweater Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2005
    Posts:
    1,678
    Location:
    Philippines, the Political Dynasty Capital of the
    for now, I am using Star Downloader free. I can resume my interrupted download...but there are some site/or programs/files :cautious: that do not support resume..and even if it resumes sometimes I got corrupted download even if the file size is complete. Also, there are some programs that couldn't be downloaded using this download manager....but when i just use the built-in firefox downloader it can be downloaded but the problem is if the file is big there's a possibility of interruption and that I cannot resume because it has no resume feature. :p :oops: o_O

    In conlusion, download manager is very useful if you have slow internet connection, your connection is fast but the file you want to download is very big and that's where the resume function can help where only a donwload manager can provide. :cool:
     
  23. mrhero

    mrhero Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Posts:
    297
    Location:
    Ankara , Turkey
  24. pcaca

    pcaca Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Posts:
    62
    Also my choice
     
  25. StevieO

    StevieO Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2006
    Posts:
    1,067
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.