Originally Posted by Victek123

It seems to me that the purpose of testing security products is precisely to see how they can be broken. Now of them are perfect, but it makes sense to choose one that's more difficult to break.

I don't see how an average user is somehow safer and so doesn't need the strongest possible protection. In recent years it's become clear that it isn't necessary to go looking for trouble. The malware is regularly being injected into legitimate sites. Almost all the people I've done malware cleanup for are "average" users who didn't intentionally engage in dangerous activity. If you're happy with Comodo AV that's great, but I think your reasons don't hold up.