Faronics Anti-Executable Version 4 is Released

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by Rmus, Feb 17, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Rmus

    Rmus Exploit Analyst

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2005
    Posts:
    4,020
    Location:
    California
    Hello, Thankful,

    Sorry it didn't work out.

    ----
    rich
     
  2. Rmus

    Rmus Exploit Analyst

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2005
    Posts:
    4,020
    Location:
    California
    I received confirmation from Faronics about spoofed DLLs not being blocked, and that this will be corrected in the next release -- no date given at the moment.

    ------
    -rich
     
  3. CloneRanger

    CloneRanger Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Posts:
    4,978
    @ Rmus

    Pity it doesn't block spoofed DLL's :( Be interesting to hear what Faronics say, and if they fix it quickly.

    Are you only using V4 on WinXP SP3, or on your 2000 as well ?
     
  4. kareldjag

    kareldjag Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2004
    Posts:
    622
    Location:
    PARIS AND ITS SUBURBS
    Hi,

    since 2004 that i hear Rmus talking about DP and AE, i finally concede that he was in advance: if most average users have used the same protection, most infections were be prevented.
    I've used myself a whitelist approach in 2004/2005 with the combination of Abtrusion Protector and System Safety Monitor.
    I guess that this is an easy way to lock a system.
    I've used the 2008 version of AE to play a defeating/bypass game, and of course, like most security soltions, this is not the panacea.
    I guess that Rich would be interesed in the SANS paper:
    http://www.sans.org/reading_room/wh...ication-whitelisting-panacea-propaganda_33599

    A few white list vendors/tools were have been forgotten, like a few bypassing methods (sorry, not the board for :) ).

    Since cmd.exe for instance is on the white list, this is a high level of risk, since we know some "exotic commands".
    In all case an exellent HIPS and approach.

    Rgds
     
  5. Osaban

    Osaban Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Posts:
    5,616
    Location:
    Milan and Seoul
    I have the feeling that versions 3-4 were optimized for Windows XP, as I guess the majority of the institutions who use AE and DeepFreeze would still have XP as their most common OS (libraries and Universities are not really under pressure to upgrade to Win 7 or Vista for that matter).

    I have 2 XP machines with AE V3, and it works perfectly, V4 with Vista was unusable (see post #7) V3 with Vista worked in its latest upgrades, but not perfectly (slow start up, CPU at maximum for minutes, general sluggish performance).

    I guess it is a matter of time as Win 7 will eventually supplant completely XP, AE V4 will probably be fine tuned to it. It is a great application when it works.
     
  6. Cutting_Edgetech

    Cutting_Edgetech Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Posts:
    5,694
    Location:
    USA
    AE is blocking Firefox, and not giving me any option to allow it or add it to the white list. Have I done something wrong with my white list policy? It gives me the option to allow or deny, and add to the white list all other programs thus far.
     

    Attached Files:

  7. Rmus

    Rmus Exploit Analyst

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2005
    Posts:
    4,020
    Location:
    California
    Well, that is certainly strange! That is the Alert that pops up when something on the Black List attempts to execute.

    Check your Black List to see if possibly your FF executable somehow got listed...


    ----
    rich
     
  8. Rmus

    Rmus Exploit Analyst

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2005
    Posts:
    4,020
    Location:
    California
    Only on WinXP - Versions 3 and 4 don't run on Win2K.

    ----
    rich
     
  9. Cutting_Edgetech

    Cutting_Edgetech Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Posts:
    5,694
    Location:
    USA
    Thanks Rmus,
    I did not see anything on the black list. I wish I had more time to trouble shoot this. I'm an Online Armor beta tester, and they released a new beta build so I need that machine now to beta test OA with. I may give it another shot later.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.