cleaned pc using an antivirus:)

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by jmonge, Oct 1, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Searching_ _ _

    Searching_ _ _ Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Posts:
    1,988
    Location:
    iAnywhere
    Then jmonge would've made a post like:
    "Man Avast is really cool. :cool: It find 2 troj an 2 rootkit my frien pc. I really like that Avast, how about you." :D

    He would've had 2 or 3 replies and less opportunities to use emoticons :eek::D:p ;) and then it would drop off the 1st page. :mad:

    Just sayin' :peace: :p

    Sully and Kees will help to cut down on that time a lot with their Safe-Admin. ;)
    The time it takes to wipe and reinstall + 3 minutes.
     
  2. Franklin

    Franklin Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    2,517
    Location:
    West Aussie
    I think Kees was playing around with that key where if the value is changed to 1 then only a meta file is downloaded instead of the exe. Not really sure on that though?
     
  3. Tarnak

    Tarnak Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2007
    Posts:
    5,295
  4. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Posts:
    5,925
    1806 enables/disables the question with downloaded files from unsecure zones
    opening in secure zones
    http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=645496&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=90

    HTH

    @bryanjoe
    i can afford that point for me - much people rely on my opinion - i dont miss
    one in a hundred. posting his action here dont earn only congrats.
    btw - still havent found the EDIT button too? :rolleyes:

    @Tarnak - nothing against his personal experience.
    at first sight it seems ok, but digging deeper there is no gold to claim.
    in few cases cleaning is the only option - but not here as it seems.
    and if his friend dont change behaviour the next crash is coming for sure.

    PS "Sully and Kees" are who?
    3 Minutes is the time here to recover from image ;)
     
    Last edited: Oct 2, 2010
  5. bryanjoe

    bryanjoe Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2006
    Posts:
    380
    oh please....
    if you aint here to share, please afford posting non-relevant remarks.
    ......

    since we are not gonna benefit from it either...

    ps.... i never rely on your opinon....
     
  6. CloneRanger

    CloneRanger Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Posts:
    4,978
    But what does the change do ?

    Thanks, but Kernelwars is saying the opposite 1 - 3 ?

    Found this - http://support.microsoft.com/kb/182569 - 1806 Miscellaneous: Launching applications and unsafe files - but doesn't mention the reg entry numbers etc.

    @ Brummelchen

    Just seen your post :thumb: From the link

    Now we know ;) I prefer 1 = prompt actually, still safe if only allow known/wanted stuff :thumb:
     
  7. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Posts:
    5,925
    sharing WHAT?
    i already wrote a solution - if you dont read dont bother me again.
    and - this topic only is about cleaning up - not to prevent.
    he didnt asked for that - and the computer is already gone.
    its not my fault if jmonge dont ask before he acts.

    @cloneranger - due to firefox regarding the rules of trusted zones i have 1806 set to 0 (null).
    that dword is a relict for me coming from windows xp with ie6 which dont offer
    that setting (comes with ie7). i stored a reg-file with that setting in my tweak
    folder and its valid on win7. hth
     
  8. Kernelwars

    Kernelwars Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Posts:
    2,155
    Location:
    TX
    u ofcourse want to change zones:eek: if u want to access intranet sites zone then value 1 and for the Internet sites zone value 3..but as you are saying 1=prompt I think you are talking about interface value in that case 65536 adminapproved & 3 is disabled:eek: :eek:
     
  9. wat0114

    wat0114 Guest

    Brummelchen offers sound advice, for sure, but under the circumstances with little experience under his belt and the infected pc not having a backup image on hand, jmonge did a good job. In the end his friend was happy with a working pc. It might be worth finding out how the pc became infected in the first place and maybe advise on and develop a security strategy to prevent it from happening again. Some nice resources worth reading here from Blue.
     
  10. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
    cloneranger the default value is 1 and by changing to 3 then all files will be access denny from browser(IE=microsoft)
     
  11. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
    i have this line 1806 with it's value 3 with IE6 and it works just fine;) so it works to block all drive by attacks i tested this alone againts them and remain safe but if i have it change to 1 is not save as it will not prompt when injecting without one's knowledge so clone ranger i will prefer to change it's value to 3;) :thumb: very safe

    note:i am currently testing this with malware without any antivirus just winpatrol plus and for about 2 weeks already havent get infected:thumb: i am doing this for the sake of testing and to see if it works and it does:thumb:
     
  12. Franklin

    Franklin Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    2,517
    Location:
    West Aussie
    Didn't have the 1806 line here in Win 7 so added it with a value of 3 then stopped/started explorer.

    Starting with a fresh sandboxed FF I tried to download 3 malwares and CCleaner but all four were auto canceled with only four zero byte files showing that can be manually recovered from the sandbox.

    I think Kees refered to these as meta data or something similar?

    Down.JPG

    Meta.JPG
     
  13. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
    zero bytes is a good sign man:thumb: so it works for firefox tooo_O
     
  14. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
    i wonder if it works with chromeo_O
     
  15. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Posts:
    5,925
    chrome does not regard trusted zones like firefox do. simple as that.
     
  16. Jav

    Jav Guest

    From usability point of view it means you can't download anything with firefox?
     
  17. Franklin

    Franklin Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    2,517
    Location:
    West Aussie
    If you merge the below reg files all you have to do is restart IE or FF to implement. No need to stop/start explorer like I did earlier.

    No exe downloads:
    Allowed exe downloads:
     
  18. Jav

    Jav Guest

    I see, Thank you :)
     
  19. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
    very handy dandy;)
    @wat0114 thanks for advise and i think it was by going to the dark side as always you know what i mean:D
     
  20. CloneRanger

    CloneRanger Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Posts:
    4,978
    RE - [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\Zones\3]
    "1806"=dword = ?

    I'm confused now :D

    That entry is still unchanged at 1 on my comp as i've left it alone, due to,

    With both IE6 & FF v3 i have always set both up to prompt me before a DL, and it Always works = :thumb: So i guess the registry settings for those selected options must be elsewhere, and it would "appear" to me, that these override the discussed Zones\3 ?
     
  21. Franklin

    Franklin Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    2,517
    Location:
    West Aussie
    Yep CloneRanger you or I and probably all Wilders folks have most things sorted but for a normal user that block exe downloads reg setting could be of help.

    Such as the fake scan site below which tries to trick the user into downloading/executing the fake Microsoft Security Essentials alert.

    Fake Scan.JPG


    Fake 2.JPG
     
  22. DasFox

    DasFox Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2006
    Posts:
    1,825
    jmonge when you first start messing with an infected box boot into safe and check msconfig and kill whatever looks wrong or odd running at startup, check the Add/Remove programs and use as many apps then as possible in Safe Mode, then try booting to the desktop and life will be much simpler.

    Also I always run like Malwarebytes and SuperAntispyware typically first in a quick mode just to gain back some system ability then I go for full modes...

    P.S. After looking at your first post and all those apps you ran and you still had problems, backup data and just REFORMAT the box and be done with it! ;) Sometimes it's better just to reinstall the darn thing rather then mucking forever trying to clean it, trust me I've been there already and you've got to know from the beginning when it's better not to try and save it. ;)
     
  23. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
    i did that buddy;)
     
  24. wat0114

    wat0114 Guest

    Although I don't like the idea of cleaning a highly infected system (in my case if it were to happen to me I'd restore a recent image) and reformatting or better yet wiping will guarantee removal of the malware, how long does it take to do this, including all drivers, patches, software and user settings? A long time, like at least 1/2 a day, so it's not the best or most efficient way, and probably could be considered a "lamer's" way of doing things, although someone with little experience could be forgiven for going that route. Anyone who continues, however, in allowing their rig to get infected without learning from previous ordeals by applying preventative measures such as updated antivirus, sandboxing, limited account use, anti-executable...etc, nor (and just as importantly) quick recovery measures such as image/restore applications, and of course safe surfing/downloading habits is obviously content on relying on the less efficient or effective cleansing or reformatting approaches instead.
     
  25. DasFox

    DasFox Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2006
    Posts:
    1,825

    Well I said reformat, because most likely there was no backup image, like something, as Image For Windows.

    Now IFW is the smartest way to go if to much infection and you're back to clean in around 10 mins on average with most image restores...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.