COMODO Firewall Pro 3.0.14.276 Released

Discussion in 'other firewalls' started by Coolio10, Dec 12, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Coolio10

    Coolio10 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Posts:
    1,124
    No new features.

    Fixes all major bugs and problems. Enjoy! Please offer feedback as long as it is not about how hard it is to use. If you find anymore problems it would be nice to know.

     
  2. Norton360

    Norton360 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2007
    Posts:
    71
    Wow, the setup of previous version was about 30 MB.

    This one is only 9.08 MB.
     
  3. Coolio10

    Coolio10 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Posts:
    1,124
    :D. You wouldn't think a safelist would be bigger than the application :D.
     
  4. xandros

    xandros Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2006
    Posts:
    411
    thank you
     
  5. gkweb

    gkweb Expert Firewall Tester

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2003
    Posts:
    1,932
    Location:
    FRANCE, Rouen (76)
    Hello,

    I'm glad to see that CPF now passes with success the seven keylogging tests from AKLT v3.0, good job to them (below is the 7th test, GetRawInputData).

    Regards,
    gkweb.
     

    Attached Files:

  6. Vettetech

    Vettetech Former Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Posts:
    339
    Hey Coolio is there a hot key function? I like that feature with OA so you don't have to right click the icon on your taskbar.
     
  7. Diver

    Diver Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2005
    Posts:
    1,444
    Location:
    Deep Underwater
    Instead of complaining about how hard Comodo 3.0 is to use, perhaps someone has some insight as to how to make it easier to use, short of turning off the HIPS.
     
  8. Coolio10

    Coolio10 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Posts:
    1,124
    No hotkeys vette.
     
  9. Coolio10

    Coolio10 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Posts:
    1,124
    It is actually quiete easy to tune it down without killing protection. See pic. This will prevent the need for installation mode and certain applications such as browsers or archivers from alerting when creating files.

    Even easier is to turn off monitoring direct access excluding keyboard ofcourse.
     

    Attached Files:

  10. WSFuser

    WSFuser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Posts:
    10,639
    So has anyone experienced this improvement?
     
  11. Coolio10

    Coolio10 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Posts:
    1,124
    My 5k mem in total dropped to 3k?
     
  12. Vettetech

    Vettetech Former Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Posts:
    339
    Ok uninstalled my trusty Online Armor and installed this. Much, much improved. No annoying pop ups, Installs easy. Learns well. I am impressed with this new version. Yes I have D+ on.
     
  13. disinter1

    disinter1 Guest

    Wow, this should have been the real final, I like!:D
     
  14. Vettetech

    Vettetech Former Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Posts:
    339
    Mem usage dropped. 10 - 13K .Sweet. This is the way it should have been released. Now all we need is a new version of NOD32 3.0 and we will be all set.
     
  15. Joliet Jake

    Joliet Jake Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Posts:
    911
    Location:
    Scotland
    Amen! I, on the other hand, am trying out Online Armor and have been impressed thus far. I'm sticking to NOD V2.7 in the meantime.
     
  16. Coolio10

    Coolio10 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Posts:
    1,124
    There is no shakespear in security :D.
     
  17. Vettetech

    Vettetech Former Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Posts:
    339
    Its a proven fact that Online Armor and Comodo are the 2 top software firewalls. Its just which one your prefer. I always used Comodo 2.4 and when 3.0 came out I was so disappointed and went elsewhere............which lead me to Online Armor. But now with this new version of Comodo I am back to using it. Lets see what new versions Online Armor brings to the plate.
     
  18. Vettetech

    Vettetech Former Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Posts:
    339
    So should I uncheck those items you unchecked?
     
  19. Coolio10

    Coolio10 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Posts:
    1,124
    Up to you.
     
  20. Vettetech

    Vettetech Former Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Posts:
    339
    Ok first problem..........all my apps in Firewall and D+ keep disappearing.
     
  21. Vettetech

    Vettetech Former Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Posts:
    339
    Well seems like it was a Windowblinds problem.
     
  22. bellgamin

    bellgamin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    8,102
    Location:
    Hawaii
    Please provide a link where I can see this "proof" with my own eyes.:cautious:
     
  23. WSFuser

    WSFuser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Posts:
    10,639
  24. Wordward

    Wordward Former Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2007
    Posts:
    707
    Does this count? LOL. http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2007/11/25/93/
    Boy bellgamin and WSFuser, you guys are late nighters aren't you? I'm going to bed now myself, but before I do I will say this. In my IMO ZAAS is a very nice Firewall, but it does come with the Welcome Screen hesitation problem. Online Armor is just plain nice and well supported. And finally Comodo Pro is just a flat out nice alternative for those like myself that can't spend the money right now. As far as anyone of them being Top Rated however, well how do you really prove that? That's why I'll stick to calling them nice. LOL.
     
  25. bellgamin

    bellgamin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    8,102
    Location:
    Hawaii
    I'm not one of Scot's subscribers ...not any more. Opinions are like armpits -- everybody has them & some don't smell so sweet.;)

    Comodo & OA are superb but so also are Webroot FW, Look'n'Stop, Netveda et alia -- not to mention a NAT/SPI router+ProSec (or SSM or EQSecure).

    If someone infers there is proof to the contrary, let's have a look at it, wot. :gack:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.