In the time where one can buy notebook hard drives that have built-in whole disk encryption, it would probably be best for Acronis to change the...
Well what I just did this week was: delete the secure zone, then wiped the free space on the drive (7 times). So obviously I don't think having...
I hear ya. I'm concerned with both.
Am I missing something relevant here? I am uncertain how this relates to the discussion on the adviseability, or not, of incorporating the...
Microsoft doesn't allow anyone but tier 1 OEMs to bundle configured-as-delivered OS images on removable media. They do allow a hard drive image...
Just deleting the SZ is not a secure operation. Sure, it would be difficult to retrieve old data from a drive in which the SZ was deleted, but...
You CAN manage secure zone. How? You have to change the "format" to regular FAT32, and there you go... I think the SZ is FAT32 by...
Windows vista is a file-based OS with a new file-based install (as compared with WinXP which wants certain files at certain places on the disk)....
A reason not to use secure zone is because you can't manage or wipe images that you create there and that is a potential security issue. Someone...
Since Windows will begin to run slowly without regular defragmenting and defragmenting increases incremental image sizes, I've pretty much...
<i>If you create one single entire drive image and store it to keep and then continue with regular selected partition(s) imaging, you can do all...
As far as I know, TI will only allow bare metal restore when an image has been created of the entire drive (all partitions) and this is a severe...
Separate names with a comma.
