That's because their CDN is refusing to be paid in Roubles any more :)
AV-Comparatives' fearless leader has a thing against Norton ever since Norton decided to pull out of the static scan tests. I think NS 15 is...
You use the word FUD a lot. There is no Uncertainty in the fact that malware can and does phone home and steal info A LOT. If you still need proof...
If you are suggesting that rollback helps with protection, you are wrong. It helps with clean AFTER the malware has been detected, by which time...
Rollback... oh rollback. We don't need up to the minute detection if we have rollback right ? :-) Well there is no such thing as reliable rollback...
Norton has had rollback since 2009 and has been tweaking/improving it ever since.
I am sorry, are you saying that kernel rootkits are weird/apocalyptic ?
Look for Kaspersky Internet Security 2015 on Youtube. They are doing poorly compared to others.
Wow really ?? These sure are late to the party when it comes to different technologies interacting with each other. The industry has been on this...
The recent videos on YouTube testing Norton Security 2015 show its doing really well. Testers seem like it. MBAM and HitmanPro are the little...
Yes, I still see the Boot Time Protection option.
So Rollback (which is lots of limitations) is compensated by Good Detection ? :-) But Webroot has Poor detection, which they say is compensated by...
I didn't say they were the same thing. Please read my post. I said "But you don't need to go that far". Direct I/O and IOCTLs are two different...
Which is a pity because I wouldn't trust Kaspersky with my dog, let alone putting them on my PC with access to all my data.
Yeah, some versions of Tidserv, ZeroAccess. But you don't even need to go that far, any kernel-mode malware using directed I/O with an altitude...
If you would like to suggest a set of tests that will help demonstrate how Kaspersky sucks, please post it here. AV-Test, Comparatives, DTL and...
I guess people don't try AV-Test either now ?;)
Do you even know how commissioned tests work. Symantec or any company has no say in how the results turn out. They give the tester a list of tests...
If its using its own driver, then likely it any changes from kernel rootkits will be or can be made invisible to it, especially if they using SCSI...
Quite the whackjob. Definitely don't want anything from such a guy running on my computer. Reminds me of Comodo :-)
Lesser decisions to make.. just one product. Simple!
No internet connection means it puts the whole test in question. This test doesn't represent most user scenarios where an always on broadband...
Really ?? Lol. Java exploits, Adobe exploits. Drive-by downloads are the most common way by which people are being infected. Look at the Microsoft...
Which means by 'default' since it doesn't block it and allows it to run, it will read your sensitive docs and send it outbound and nothing will...
Webroot talks a lot about rollback, but it isn't sandboxing read operations is it . So if the running malware reads from location that Webroot...
Separate names with a comma.