The Symantec/Norton Thread.

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Mayahana, Jan 21, 2015.

  1. 142395

    142395 Guest

    Agreed, and I actually appreciate this part. Even when I say I hate Google, I OTOH say I much appreciate their huge contribution to whole IT security. In short, it's still another story, I separate them, but yeah still much better than some big name who forgot about social contribution...A**l*...
    :argh:
     
  2. coolcfan

    coolcfan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Posts:
    130
    Mine too...
     
  3. Mortal Raptor

    Mortal Raptor Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2014
    Posts:
    1,013
    BTW, how does Norton Security deal with PUPs? I don't see any option in the settings to detect PUPs
     
  4. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    8,642
    Location:
    USA
    Run with MBAM.
     
  5. Mortal Raptor

    Mortal Raptor Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2014
    Posts:
    1,013
    So tha't's a NO for my question? I won't run MBAM due to high FPs and I'd never run 2 security solutions at the same time no matter what exclusions I can add. I simply don't do it. My security layer is an ad blocker, a firewall in my router, and a good AV + some common sense. You probably know that to me try to strike the best balance between security and performance and I have a performance detector built into my heart that can alert me for any slowdown :D

    No seriously, pretty sad if NS doesn't catch PUPs.
     
  6. Nightwalker

    Nightwalker Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Posts:
    1,387
    It does catch PUPs and generally does a good job because of the reputation technology (File Insight).

    If you are serious about PUPs install Unchecky or change back to Eset Nod32 / Emsisoft Anti Malware :argh:


    http://unchecky.com/
     
  7. Mortal Raptor

    Mortal Raptor Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2014
    Posts:
    1,013
    Ahh yes the file insight, you reminded me that did catch a few stuff before I forgot about it. Was wondering where the PUP setting is but now I realize the Norton File Insight probably catches these things.

    As to unchecky, I don't need that, I know how to install stuff without ticking anything, that's for n00bs :argh:
     
  8. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    8,642
    Location:
    USA
    Norton does catch some PUPs, but not on the level something like ESET does. MBAM runs fine with NS, but if it's not for you, then it's not for you.
     
  9. Mortal Raptor

    Mortal Raptor Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2014
    Posts:
    1,013
    Thanks dawg
     
  10. Mayahana

    Mayahana Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2014
    Posts:
    2,220
    Somewhere in Wilders there is a thread on setting Norton up to kill PUPs.

    Mostly it's relating to turning sensitivity up to aggressive, and removal of 'low risk'. Dialed up properly, I have yet to see a PUP ever make it through Norton - mostly due to Insight AND Reputation.
     
  11. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,240
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
    Norton does detect PUPs as Potentially Unwanted Applications, but only when they cross a line.

    http://www.symantec.com/connect/articles/all-about-grayware


    Potentially Unwanted Application


    Programs that computer users wish to be made aware of. These programs include applications that have an impact on security, privacy, resource consumption, or are associated with other security risks. These programs can show a pattern of installation without user permission or notice on a system or be deemed to be separate and different from the application installed.



    http://www.symantec.com/security_response/landing/azlisting.jsp?azid=P

    Norton isn't as aggressive on PUPs as some other programs.
     
  12. Frank the Perv

    Frank the Perv Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2005
    Posts:
    882
    Location:
    Virginia, USA
    Ok, thanks Krusty.
     
  13. coolcfan

    coolcfan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Posts:
    130
    I'm checking the chinese forum everyday to see if symantec starts to sell NS22 here, just like what I do for my phone's Android 5 update..:(
     
  14. Frank the Perv

    Frank the Perv Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2005
    Posts:
    882
    Location:
    Virginia, USA
  15. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    Maybe pigs do fly....

    What's odd is that "NIS 2015" and "NAV 2015" are being sold in box packs here. I do not know what is inside those boxes because I thought these products were replaced by Norton Security....

    This shouldn't be something that needs to be configured - it ought to work well right out of the box. Maybe switching to NOD32 or Emsisoft is a better idea afterall.
     
  16. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    97,865
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    Removed Off Topic AV Comparison Post. Let's Focus Only on Symantec/Norton. Thank You!
     
  17. hawki

    hawki Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2008
    Posts:
    6,077
    Location:
    DC Metro Area
    NS 2015 makes no pretense that it kills PUPs. Take a look at the NS 2015 forums, it's loaded with user question about why NS 2015 didn't kill this virus or spyware. None of them were malicious, they were all PUPs. I believe there is a setting that allows you to set it so it automatically deletes "low risk" files and programs. My understanding is that NS 2015 will go after some PUPs if they are capable of acting maliciously. It does nothing against mere annoyances such as adware that will not harm your OS or steal personal info.

    Yeah , if you want PUP defense you need to go Emisoft, Malwarebytes, Webroot to a certain degree, hit man Pro as an on demand, maybe some others I am not aware of. Most security vendors are afraid to go after PUPs for legal reasons. First, the user may have consented to its installation while downloading free ware and who knows? Maybe somewhere in the Universe there are some idiots that like adware :)
    .
    For PUPs you allow to be installed while downloading freeware by not paying attention, there is a nice little freeware program called "Unchecky"

    http://unchecky.com/
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2015
  18. Mayahana

    Mayahana Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2014
    Posts:
    2,220
    Webroot for PUP? No. Apparently you missed my posts/logs in the WR thread where my father in-law's machine was loaded up with PUA/PUP's, and Webroot said they were largely 'harmless'. WSA has never been good with PUP/PUA detection from what it appears. Unchecky is marginal, as it only works with a 'few' products.

    While Emsisoft and MBAM are kings of pup fighting. Norton is entirely capable of keeping PUP/PUA's off of your system, provided you set it correctly. I put it on a couple of 'severe clicker' systems, and haven't seen a PUA/PUP make it on yet. Part of the reason is if you set Insight higher, Norton simply won't allow PUP's to be installed by virtue of the fact that PUP's have a lower reputation. I don't have the settings in front of me but it's not rocket science.. Aggressive, Always, Low Risk ticked max, etc. It does just fine in that regard.
     
  19. siketa

    siketa Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2012
    Posts:
    2,718
    Location:
    Gaia
    ESET detects more PUPs than Emsi. ;)
     
  20. Mortal Raptor

    Mortal Raptor Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2014
    Posts:
    1,013
    and has no FPs ;)
     
  21. siketa

    siketa Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2012
    Posts:
    2,718
    Location:
    Gaia
    Every product has FPs. ;)
     
  22. stapp

    stapp Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Posts:
    24,067
    Location:
    UK
    Off topic posts removed.

    Thread subject is Symantec/Norton

    Please stay on topic.
     
  23. boredog

    boredog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2015
    Posts:
    2,499
    Hello

    Is this the setting you might be talking about for LOW RISK?

    It gives three choices.
    1. remove
    2. ignore
    3. ask me

    the default setting is ask me.
    ScreenHunter_02 Apr. 04 09.32.jpg
     
  24. FleischmannTV

    FleischmannTV Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2013
    Posts:
    1,094
    Location:
    Germany
    That is interesting. I think it used to be automatic / remove / ask me and the default was automatic. They either changed something or my recollection of it is wrong.
     
  25. boredog

    boredog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2015
    Posts:
    2,499
    just double checked and it is remove ignore or ask me but maybe I am not seeing the right section for PUPS either. I also see Sonar advanced mode has an aggressive mode set to auto by default and undr that is a remove risks automaticly tab set to High-Certailny only by default but can be set to always or ask me.
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2015
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.